Obama claims executive privilege for Eric Holder's wife, mother in Fast and Furious lawsuit | Personal Liberty - Galt's Gulch

Remove this ad.

4

Obama claims executive privilege for Eric Holder's wife, mother in Fast and Furious lawsuit | Personal Liberty

Posted by rockymountainpirate 10 years, 3 months ago to Government

6 comments | Share | Flag

This is the most transparent administration ever.

I have some swamp land for you and the EPA will let you do whatever you want on it.

SOURCE URL: http://personalliberty.com/obama-claims-executive-privilege-eric-holders-wife-mother-fast-furious-lawsuit/

Add Comment

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

3

Posted by ObjectiveAnalyst 10 years, 3 months ago

Pure nonsense. When will the MSM and those in Congress hold these miscreants accountable?

Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink
- 2
  
  Posted by richrobinson 10 years, 3 months ago
  
  Possibly the MSM will after the mid terms. Obama is no longer going to run and criticism at that point would probably help Hillary and other Democrats.
  
  Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
  - 2
    
    Posted by ObjectiveAnalyst 10 years, 3 months ago
    
    Could be... One can hope. We now see how many democrats are feeling free to distance themselves from O, now that their own elections hang in the balance.
    
    Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink

2

Posted by richrobinson 10 years, 3 months ago

I knew when they said they would be the most transparent administration ever that it was a lie. I just had no idea it would get this bad. I keep trying to figure out what Nixon did that was so bad.

Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink
- 2
  
  Posted by rockymountainpirate 10 years, 3 months ago
  
  Yes, me too.
  
  Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink

1

Posted by Technocracy 10 years, 2 months ago

How does one claim executive privilege for the spouse and mother of the AG?

They are neither government employees or part of the operation.

Holder's wife is already covered because she cannot be compelled to testify against her husband in any case.

But I'm curious what spurious legal justification they are trying to use, especially for the mother.

Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink

Comment hidden.