CDC: You Can Give—But Can’t Get—Ebola on a Bus
"Dr. Tom Frieden, director for the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), said during a telephone press briefing Wednesday that you cannot get Ebola by sitting next to someone on a bus, but that infected or exposed persons should not ride public transportation because they could transmit the disease to someone else."
This guy has a career ahead in politics! "I voted for Ebola before I voted against it" could be his mantra.
This guy has a career ahead in politics! "I voted for Ebola before I voted against it" could be his mantra.
http://video.foxnews.com/v/3841780237001...
Modern day education believes that to be just the opposite. They are well educated in the learning of facts, however they have failed to learn to think. That is the modern smart person and that is also the most useless encyclopedia ever created. At least a person who has learned to think can look something up from the book version, or internet version. The modern government brain is like an encyclopedia no one can open or access.
They can't understand *this* C&E statement... You tell the people something... it's either latent or blatant lies, falsehoods, and misdirection... and people stop believing you... and that leads to people not believing anything emanating from the DC cesspit.
This guy is apparently a graduate of O'Brien University, the Winston Smith / Joseph Stalin School of Journalistic Doublespeak.
Repeat that 101 times.
Regardless of that, any skin contact with the bodily fluids, including semen and all of more noxious stuff will get you a wonderful reward that you really do not want!
When he gave his interview to Megyn Kelly, my internal lie detector sounded its alarm about a minute into his interview, and then with every word he spoke other than calling Megyn Kelly by name.
Fact 1: You cannot catch ebola by riding on a bus.
Fact 2: You should not ride on a bus because you might give someone ebola.
They have no idea of Cause & Effect
They recognize each theoretically but don't have a clue about the association between the two.
Which is also why they tend to invert the two within the relationship they do not understand.
Again with feeling ..
http://www.plusaf.com/linkedin/linked-in...
"Spirit Science and Metaphysics," and you're looking for scientific corroboration of information appearing on that site?
Sorry, my science-and-engineering gland kicked in when I started reading there and I couldn't force myself to read the whole thing.
But I'm looking forward to what other folks' responses to your post might be...
which is "proof" against all argument, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance. That principle is condemnation without investigation."
So like you, I'm looking forward to what other folks' responses to my post might be, particularly those who have taken the time to "study to know, know to understand, understand to judge", and who have thus not condemned the information at that original link without investigation or even reading it all, as well as who have not been put off by the words "Spirit Science and Metaphysics"..
Unfortunately, that commentary was riddled with "anyone can see's" and "I can't believes" and the like, making assumptions that 'obviously' lead to all of the conclusions he was trying to lead us to in the first place. He must be LOTS of fun at a WTC roundtable 'discussion' of 9-11... While he sounds quite plausible and utterly believable and convincing, he offered NO tangible data, knowledge or information that could or would PROVE the points he was making.
He was, in essence, 'condemning without offering investigative information' himself! And you were/are defending him for doing such a 'service' for us all.
If you can't recognize the contradictions in all that, well... we really can't carry on a conversation or 'discussion' on this topic. But it was fun digging deeper into the alleged 'facts' he offered.
Cheerio!
Oh, and ps... I have not voted your comments Up OR Down. Someone else did. Really. You've impressed some others here, too, apparently.