17

How D.C. Stole Everything.

Posted by freedomforall 1 month ago to Politics
17 comments | Share | Flag

Excerpt:
"So essentially the entire town of Washington, D.C. has been stealing. The anomalies are those who are not stealing. $4.7 trillion, almost impossible to trace, represents two-thirds of the annual U.S. budget. And if it’s happening in the U.S., it is happening everywhere: France, Canada, the U.K., Germany, where budgetary processes are probably even more opaque than those of the U.S.

How does the Department of Defence have a $35 trillion black hole?

I used to think of people who worked for the government with a kind of veiled contempt or, in a more benign mood, compassion. I thought of them as pity jobs for those without initiative, as jobs paying off lefty campaigners, as a warehouse for the barely competent. In my own dealings with them, I found them punitive and extractive, papering me with demands to spend more and more money to hire more and more of their pet contractors, to get approval. In my working life, looking at the results of their involvement in America’s rural areas, I hated them for the hell they visited on people unable to fight back. They forced bad science on good people, and refused to see reason. They ruined forests, water courses, fisheries, and township after township turned to dustbowl status. The misery in rural sitting rooms in every state in the U.S. was palpable, long lasting; the green Blob ruined families for generations."
SOURCE URL: https://elizabethnickson.substack.com/p/give-us-back-our-fuing-money-how


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • 12
    Posted by $ Commander 1 month ago
    And all that was needed was an honest audit.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • 10
      Posted by 1 month ago
      Which was blocked repeatedly by the D.C. criminal gang of traitors.
      Execute anyone who stood in the way. D.C. NIFO
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ Commander 1 month ago
        There's worse punishment. Strip the guilty of all assets and exile.
        Living is worse than dying sometimes.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by 1 month ago
          Agree with seizing all assets.
          Unfortunately, as Buydem proved again, pardons by corrupt [unelected] potus would
          reverse the punishment, probably reward the guilty, and punish the innocent public again.
          If they are convicted traitors, public execution and wide distribution of that video
          is needed for punishment and to discourage potential (and undiscovered) traitors.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by $ rainman0720 1 month ago
            I have no articles handy to include to back this up, but I have seen a couple of online mentions of a SCOTUS challenge to Buydem's "pre-emptive" pardons. The argument is that if you haven't been convicted of doing anything wrong, you can't be pardoned. Taken to its (il)logical conclusion, a president could issue a blanket pardon to every single person in the US and nobody could ever be convicted of anything. I don't see how a pre-emptive pardon can stand up in court, but a) I'm no lawyer, and b) I didn't stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by CaptainKirk 1 month ago
    We Must Audit the Govt.
    Audit the Fed (Disband them)
    Audit our Elections/Voting.

    In my first pass of the voter data. MI had an outsized number of voters in 2020 that never voted before or after in a Presidential Election. Oh, and the total number... Is like 40,000 more than the margin Biden "won" by. So, basically the QUESTIONABLE votes look to take it from a Trump Win to a Biden Win...

    Oh, and something fishy is going on with their Voter Registration Dates. MANY of them "registered" years after 2020, but clearly voted in 2020.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by fairbro 1 month ago
      Where are you getting this info from? I want to write a book about the 2020 election but it's difficult to find comparative statistics (actual numbers of votes down to house district), to prove probabilities and spot way-off-the-Bell-Curve oddities.

      California, I added up the House Votes, the Repubs got 41%, the Dems 59% statewide. The Repubs should have gotten 21 of the 52 House seats, instead they got 9, because of the gerrymandering. Instead of a comfortable 230-205 margin, we get a 2-3 seat margin because of this unethical Sacramento statehouse.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by CaptainKirk 1 month ago
        I testified against Brenda Snipes in Florida in Federal Court. I did the data analysis that was finding the problems she refused to address.

        I gave up after that because NOTHING gets fixed.

        But my friend in MI (Where I grew up). Asked if I would look at it. So we got the MI Voter Data, and I loaded it into the Database.

        Then I created one table of all of the votes cast in the 2020 election. And ran my queries against that so I could analyze them.

        That's when I thought about the Voter Registration dates and was SHOCKED to see people were voting BEFORE their Registration date. The data is horrible.

        I am taking all of these 194K (don't quote me) extra voters who never voted before/after (for pres). And I want to crunch their addresses against a Federal Address DB. And see how many "Bad/Fake" addresses there are.

        Keep in mind that MI has same day voter registration. Otherwise called: Ballot Stuffing.
        Just fill out a fake voter registration file. The addresses are the hardest thing to get right!
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by fairbro 1 month ago
          Wow, Brenda Snipes, how could you tolerate the stench in the courtroom?

          How did you do the data analysis, any statistical methods?

          Where did you get MI data from, it is public? How were you able to ascertain they voted before they registered? Are they different DB's? If that data is in one database, it would be more compelling.

          Federal address DB, that's going to be difficult too
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by CaptainKirk 1 month ago
            She had 5 Soros lawyers, and 2 DNC lawyers.
            Only the Odor of Mendacity. LOL

            Yeah, FOIA request. We get the data online nowadays, in separate files (voters, voting_history).

            They are flat files, so I had to load them into one of my databases.

            Honestly, I never did the statistical analysis. I did the raw queries (and created some of the ideas, like more than 7 voters in a single address, more than 3 voting last names at a single address).

            I would extract the data, and give it to the Lawyers to crunch through. They would ask for more clarifications.

            The obvious one. All voters over 100, sorted by oldest first. I think we had a 129 yr old active voter.

            But you have to be careful. What I see is "indications"... Not Crimes. We had 13 registered voters at a one bedroom home. Pure insanity.

            Voted before they registered. Well, clearly it's a PROBLEM in the data. SOMEONE changed their voter registration date. NOW we have to figure out when that happens. (Sometimes people move, change their last name, etc. Different states have different rules).

            But see how easy it is to JUMP to the conclusion they voted before they were registered. No. The registration date is simply AFTER ONE of the times they voted. Fishy. BUT maybe just a typo, or an update.

            The 129 yr old voter. Was human error entering a handwritten birthday. The problem is that the error has been there for like 30 years. Our COMPLAINT was that, as citizens, we are allowed to review this. And if we find issues like this, we SUBMIT them to the SOE and they are supposed to look into them.

            And they were not. Hundreds of addresses were pointing to the SOEs Office Buildings. They were mailing themselves mail-in ballots. LMAO. True story. So the homeless people could vote, is there excuse.

            We were like "They are homeless... They don't need a mail in ballot, they can vote on election day or in person..."

            The Federal Address verification system has an API. We use it to determine counties, given an address + zip, and this helps us calculate sales taxes.

            I just haven't yanked the code and thrown it into something to resolve these, just yet.

            I am thinking I should maybe write a Gulch Post with my MI Data Review. Strange stuff happened in the 2020 election. Notice how Trump got more votes in 2020 than in 2016, and even more in 2024... His curve seems natural, the dems (Biden) seems artificial. But proving that is impossible.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Posted by fairbro 3 weeks, 6 days ago
              Sounds like a good book, or did you already do that?
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
              • Posted by CaptainKirk 3 weeks, 6 days ago
                Nah, I write code, not dialog. LOL.
                I am hoping to get more time, and more detailed answers on the changing dates.

                I will probably write a Gulch Post about the details once I have enough clarity that I can explain what I see.

                Our own government says that when Voter Turnout Exceeds 80% fraud is like, above 85% it's almost always fraud.

                That's because the voter rolls are notoriously "dirty" (2% dead people/yr, people move, etc)
                Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                • Posted by fairbro 3 weeks, 6 days ago
                  Reminds me of the elections of DC, where one precinct reported 103% of the registered voters cast ballots for the Democrats.

                  With my statistical background and your real-world experience, we could collude on a best-seller about the theft of the 2020 election!

                  Republicans are walking on a thin edge. California would have yielded 21 House seats without gerrymandering (in 2024), instead the good guys have 9. Illinois is way off the Bell curve, too.
                  Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                  • Posted by mccannon01 3 weeks, 5 days ago
                    I hope you both keep the Gulch informed of your findings. I know there is virtually nothing to be done about changing the results regarding the Biden presidency, but the culprits of the fraud can be brought to justice. As a process programmer seeing the "magic" step function in the voter data for Biden in the wee hours of the morning of some key locales made me sit up and exclaim, "WTF!".
                    Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by rhfinle 1 month ago
    Very well said, FFA.
    Ever since the inauguration, I've had two songs playing in my head: Pink Floyd's "Tear Down The Wall"and the Who's "Won't Get Fooled Again".
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo