Trump vs. the Judges: Judicial Treachery and the End of Democracy
Posted by freedomforall 4 days, 15 hours ago to Politics
Excerpt:
"As the Trump Administration is thwarted in its efforts to cut federal spending, bloat, and waste time and again by activist judges, the people of the country must understand what is going on and what it likely says about the nation’s future. These judges—most of whom were appointed by Democratic presidents Clinton, Obama, and Biden—have taken it upon themselves to make policy and to engage in political maneuvering to spare the political status quo the fate for which the American people voted last November. Unironically and unapologetically, they are undoing the will of demos, purportedly to save democracy.
Interestingly, the Democrats who cheer the activist judges and their rulings are open and unremorseful about their overt injection of politics into the system of judicial review. Chuck Schumer, the Senate Minority Leader, crowed to PBS “Newshour” this week that he and his fellow Democrats are responsible for “saving democracy” because they intentionally packed the courts with judges that shared their ideology and would be unafraid to apply it to any case involving President Trump. “We did put 235 judges, 235 progressive judges, judges not under the control of Trump, last year on the bench, and they are ruling against Trump time after time after time.”
As justification for their use of the courts to stymie the will of the democratically elected administration, the Democrats (naturally) cite Marbury v. Madison, in which every schoolboy (and girl) used to be taught strengthened the concept of judicial review and established the courts as a proper constitutional check on the executive and legislative branches. The catch here is that Marbury v. Madison was decided on procedural, constitutional grounds, thereby intentionally sidestepping the contentious politics of the case. More to the point, the ruling purposefully constrained the ability of elected officials to use the courts as vehicles for their political gambits, even as it also reined in the Supreme Court itself, arguing that its actions in defense of politically stacking the judiciary were unconstitutional."
=================================
D.C. NIFO
"As the Trump Administration is thwarted in its efforts to cut federal spending, bloat, and waste time and again by activist judges, the people of the country must understand what is going on and what it likely says about the nation’s future. These judges—most of whom were appointed by Democratic presidents Clinton, Obama, and Biden—have taken it upon themselves to make policy and to engage in political maneuvering to spare the political status quo the fate for which the American people voted last November. Unironically and unapologetically, they are undoing the will of demos, purportedly to save democracy.
Interestingly, the Democrats who cheer the activist judges and their rulings are open and unremorseful about their overt injection of politics into the system of judicial review. Chuck Schumer, the Senate Minority Leader, crowed to PBS “Newshour” this week that he and his fellow Democrats are responsible for “saving democracy” because they intentionally packed the courts with judges that shared their ideology and would be unafraid to apply it to any case involving President Trump. “We did put 235 judges, 235 progressive judges, judges not under the control of Trump, last year on the bench, and they are ruling against Trump time after time after time.”
As justification for their use of the courts to stymie the will of the democratically elected administration, the Democrats (naturally) cite Marbury v. Madison, in which every schoolboy (and girl) used to be taught strengthened the concept of judicial review and established the courts as a proper constitutional check on the executive and legislative branches. The catch here is that Marbury v. Madison was decided on procedural, constitutional grounds, thereby intentionally sidestepping the contentious politics of the case. More to the point, the ruling purposefully constrained the ability of elected officials to use the courts as vehicles for their political gambits, even as it also reined in the Supreme Court itself, arguing that its actions in defense of politically stacking the judiciary were unconstitutional."
=================================
D.C. NIFO
DemonRats have no policy America wants, needs or asked for.
They don't have any arguments that fly with the vast majority of the electorate.
What they have are unelected radical judges who can use their judicial overreach with no accountability to the people whom through their
poorly though-out actions, (read: one-world-goverment views) negatively affect.
We elected President Trump in overwhelming numbers.
Stand up and help him help the people who voted for him, or get the fv¢k out of the way.
Prosecute him and his cohorts for treason and take him to Gitmo to get the truth about all his conspirators.
the Illegal Aliens Act was passed with a clause that excepts it from Judicial Review, per Fox News
ANY "judge" that tried is violating Law and SCOTUS
any such "judge" that tried to stop this law MUST BE removed from being a Judge
I thought that writing that might make me feel better . . . but it didn't, . , . , I'm still extremely pissed off !
Giving AID AND COMFORT TO AMERICAS ENEMIES WHILE ON US SOIL IS AN ACT OF TREASON.
DOGE access to whatever the Executive wants them to review is a great example. The Executive should simply ignore any limiting ruling, and assert "I am the elected Executive. If I want information distilled from data within an Executive Department, I will get it, and no court may inhibit this. It is fundamental to the separation of powers. Some Executive actions may be enjoined, but not information. SCOTUS, please get around to reviewing this, and setting a precedent on information, so we can move on."
The SCOTUS unwillingness to hear any 2020 election challenges proved that the SCOTUS is political, not rational.
NIFO the traitors in SCOTUS.
(I use NIFO as a 4 letter word. ;^)
The Trump team is a gigantic roadblock to the coup and lawfare is one of the tools the left still has in place. Pop the corn, it's going to get worse before it gets better.