i believe Trump is using DOGE to setup "judges"
those that clearly unconstitutionally rule against his Orders will be target for removal after investigation

one "judge" has a clear conflict already reported, his wife got funding from USAID

patience young Padawan

With you here, Abaco. However, I suspect the DOGE et al is still following the money to uncover criminal evidence. USAID certainly squandered billions of dollars, but was it illegal? - that's part of the problem as I see it. For example, flushing cash down the drain of a trans comic book in Peru may be disgusting and wasteful and the bureaucrats that ok'd it should be fired, but was it illegal? Prove kickbacks were paid somehow or some kind of money laundering took place and then you've got something. I want to see perp walks, too, but I'm not holding my breath. Shut down entities and clean house would be a good start, though.

Someone was listening...
USAID Workers Given 15 Minutes to Clear Workspaces
https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/tru...

Overwhelming percentage of "bystanders". Only those who had knowledgeable culpability can be prosecuted.
"They should have known better". How? Most employees, private and public, have no overall comprehensive knowledge of how an organization operates.
Out of 30 some employees over the years I have 4 who asked questions, were close enough to observe the integration of skills, and began their own businesses later. This is a super high percentage. I encouraged this activity face to face every week.
The boon of specialization of skills can be efficiency and/or effectiveness. The bane, ignorance due to too much comfort, especially in government funded employ.
Any organism that gets too comfortable within its environs, during great change, suffers shock and/or potential of extinction. You're fired!

The act blue money laundering will be a huge reveal. James OKeefe exposed it and after a year or so the public is finally catching on. The justice phase is coming and nothing can stop it.

There is what you KNOW and what you CAN PROVE in the court of law. Especially with BAD Judges.

There is plausible deniability. If I acted in accordance to my job, and I have ZERO obligation to prevent fraud. I can hide behind that. IF there are 2 sets of rules that conflict, it creates a Shadow I can hide in.

Here is a trick Dems use. They SUE a Dem in office for "something" (Same Day Voter Registration, because people were denied voting that could have voted)... So, they go to court over this. And the Dem Office Holder PLEADS guilty on behalf of the State, and accepts that Same Day Voter Registration would fix this. BAM, we now have court precedence.

Honestly. I am willing to give Amnesty IF and ONLY IF we also make it so in the future it MUST be prosecuted! (Imagine if Reagan gave Amnesty BUT REPEALED the Birthright Citizenship Crapola as a CONDITION). We would NOT BE in the same place.

Smaller wins are fine, as long as we fix the RULES along the way!

There is a change in attitude about funding projects not part of essential government. The open end of constant availability to finance projects is closing. A $Billionaire of $Billionaires is shining daylight on these projects. USAID is no longer an AID to those in need of financing something progressive. It will take as much as a generation of change to get a hold on the federal budget, but USAID is a small beginning.

You know, I would buy a ticket to see a trans puppet show for gay parakeets!

The highest level criminals are covering their tracks, shredding files, closing bank accounts, and many are very carefully positioned so as to have no evidence against them in the theft...how deep low and deep high up does this corruption go? And only on the Left side? I so hate to say that, but maybe? Is the Right now inheriting their stab at the money beast? God I hope not. at least DOGE is shining light on what's being going on. At least that. It's really going to be hard to chop a trillion without hurting innocent people at the bottom, while the guilty at the top remain pampered and comfortable.

$5000 rebates? That's not money saved. That was money that's already been stolen, wasted,
and it's long gone! $5000 checks is just running up the debt! Bad idea! Yes we do deserve our stolen tax money back. But tossing out another 750,000,000,000 to the people, kind of, cuts into the proposed 1 trillion to be saved...I thought that savings would be savings, pay down the debt. Not just go print/spend more!

BTW, I read somewhere that the Digital Surveillance group they took over... Has 100% rights to access/review ALL Computer/software throughout the government. Making DOGE even more powerful. It was created by OBAMA and handed to the Deep State to keep everyone else IN LINE.

But perp walks too soon, will cause MORE people to erase evidence. Keep in mind, much of this JUST BECAME ILLEGAL when Trump signed the EOs stating what must be shut down. The rest could be called GRAFT instead of Fraud. (Yeah, it seemed fishy, but this is what we always did).

FWIW, there is a legal precedent under contract law about this. If after 20yrs of paying you based on X, you discover that I was supposed to pay you differently. I Can argue that you had 20yrs in which you gladly accepted payment... And that is a tacit agreement as to how the contract was meant to operate. (not a lawyer, could be 100% wrong here)