A quarter of US "science" funding is now “diversity, gender, race” based, class warfare research. [Sorry, sKamala, that's not science.)

Posted by freedomforall 1 week, 4 days ago to Government
25 comments | Share | Flag

Americans should expect sKamala to fund science grants to help women in kneeling oral skill career advancements. "It's science because sKamala says it is."
-----------------------------------------------------
Science spending is not anywhere in the Constitution.
D.C. NIFO
SOURCE URL: https://joannenova.com.au/2024/10/a-quarter-of-us-science-funding-is-now-diversity-gender-race-based-class-warfare-research/


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by Lucky 1 week, 4 days ago
    In a sense this Joanne Nova article is hilarious. In another sense it reveals an appalling situation.

    To be fair, two comments:

    1. The source document is
    https://www.commerce.senate.gov/servi...

    This is a PDF from US Senate Committee on Commerce Science and Transportation
    Jo Nova's summary of it is good. It is not as pompous as many gov reports- no list of authors except the name Ted Cruz.

    2. The technique used appears to be word/ expression search. Comments on the JoNova site question the validity of that for science but it does give a fair representation of what people think.

    Does this bias in funding really distort the work of real scientists?
    Maybe, not as much as you may think as grant applicants, after a few months, get wise on how to fake it. They slip in a sentence and words they know are needed, no need to place carefully or integrate, the computer doing the search does not evaluate or care, just clocks up the count of correct words.

    FFA implies a question that JoNova does not ask:
    How much money, if any, should gov spend on (scientific) research?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ SpiritWoman 1 week, 3 days ago
    A great example of class warfare research is something I discovered when I asked my PCP if he would prescribe HRT (Hormone Replacement Therapy) for me. He stated he would, but that research had determined it could be carcinogenic.

    Later I found that a new 'study' undertaken by government had shown that birth control pills did not cause cancer. As you surely must know, HRT and birth control pills have the exact same ingredients, and I suspect in the exact same proportions.

    So which do we believe?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo