15

Birth of an Empire - Strangulation of Individual Liberty.

Posted by freedomforall 4 months ago to Politics
24 comments | Share | Flag

Excerpt:
"The Lincoln administration ushered in myriad economic interventions that only a few years earlier were considered illegitimate and unconstitutional. Consider just a few of the major ones. There was central banking with the National Currency Act, a precursor to the Federal Reserve’s monetary monopoly. The first income tax was invoked. Although it was ended after the war, it established a precedent that eventually led to the permanent establishment of the tax.

Military conscription was mandated for the first time. Massive regulation and regimentation of the wartime economy became a “model” for socialist planners during the post-war years as they successfully argued for regulating business in peacetime as they had during the war. Tariffs rose three-fold and remained historically high for decades. Massive, federally funded “internal improvements” (i.e., pork-barrel spending projects) were initiated, as were the first government-funded old-age pensions. Although all citizens paid federal taxes in the post-war era, only Union veterans qualified for the pensions.

Immediately after the war the public-school monopoly, which had been started in the North, was imposed on the South by federal military dictatorship. Compulsory, statist brainwashing—including false histories of the misnamed Civil War*—became universal. And government at all levels ballooned as Americans were taught to believe in the oxymoronic phrase, “government problem solving.”

The horrors of waging total war against civilian populations was legitimized as federal armies marched through the Shenandoah Valley of Virginia in 1864, burning every house, farm, and business in sight, and terrorizing helpless women and children. General Grant famously ordered cavalry officer Philip Sheridan to render the valley so barren that a crow flying over it would have to pack its own lunch.

Sheridan’s terror campaign was so successful that to this day residents still speak of “The Burning.” After the war Sheridan, Sherman, and Custer went on to finish off the Indians, administer the occupation of the South for a dozen years, and reorganize the voluntary local militias into a federally funded (and controlled) “national guard.”

The great historian of liberty, Lord Acton, understood the implications of this assault on constitutional liberty. In a November 4, 1866, letter to Robert E. Lee he wrote, “I saw in States Rights the only availing check upon the absolutism of the sovereign will, and secession filled me with hope, not as the destruction but as the redemption of Democracy.... I deemed that you were fighting the battles of our liberty, our progress, and our civilization; and I mourn for the stake which was lost at Richmond more deeply than I rejoice over that which was saved at Waterloo.”"
SOURCE URL: https://mises.org/free-market/birth-empire


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by $ 25n56il4 4 months ago
    Very good FFA. Perhaps some sanity will rear it's head before too long. I am getting a bit sour though, because I can't see an end to all the craziness. There doesn't seem to be a light at the end of this tunnel. n
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ splumb 4 months ago
      I figure it will end in one of two ways.
      It's either the End Times, or when America falls, the world will plunge into Dark Age 2.0, that will make the first one look like a pleasant summer picnic.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Genez 4 months ago
    My parents were well versed in history and with various aspects of the growth of government in the 20th century. They were John Birth Society members if anyone knows what that is. Anyway, they taught me that the "Civil War" was about states rights but man, you wouldn't believe the debates I'd end up in when trying to explain that to people. The idea that Lincoln was a strong Federalist was a concept many people just didn't or refused to understand. Yes, the bankers and Federalists were influencing things well before the 60's..
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ splumb 4 months ago
    The article neglects to mention the atrocities Lincoln committed on ordinary northern citizens.

    The First Amendment went out the window, and you could wind up in a military prison without due process.
    Soldiers would bust into your house in the dead of night, drag you off to a military prison who-knows-where, and tear the house apart, looking for “seditious evidence”, all in front of your terrified wife and kids (no wonder Karl Marx sent Lincoln a letter of congratulations. That’s right out of the future Soviet playbook).

    Just ask Francis Key Howard, the grandson of Francis Scott Key (yes, that Francis Scott Key).
    He was a newspaper editor, who dared to question some of Lincoln’s policies in the war.

    If you’d care to read about his experience, he wrote a book: Fourteen Months: In American Bastiles. It's available on Amazon and http://Bookshop.org.
    https://www.amazon.com/Fourteen-Month...
    https://bookshop.org/p/books/fourteen...

    He's far from the only one on the receiving end of this treatment. Have a neighbor that doesn't like you? All he had to do is whisper to the soldiers that you said something seditious (even if you didn't), and it's off to the hoosegow!
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Thoritsu 4 months ago
    Slavery had to end. The South was immoral. This unfortunate consequence of a superior, distributed republic government with more individual liberty could have been supported and continued for decades had it not been burdened with disgusting immorality.


    In my opinion, very much like the fight for zygote rights over women’s rights is today. It has polluted the ethical strength of Libertarian positions, with religious dogma.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 4 months ago
      Agreed, slavery had to end, but it ended peacefully everywhere else in the world as it became economically unsound.
      Lincoln's goal had nothing to do with ending slavery. That was used as an excuse to punish those who disagreed
      with Lincoln's actions to tax people in the south to payoff his political supporters in the north.
      Southern representatives tried repeatedly to meet with Lincoln to avoid war and he refused all attempts.
      Lincoln was a corrupt politician, a tyrant, a war criminal, and a traitor to the constitutional limits on government.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ splumb 4 months ago
    "The great historian of liberty, Lord Acton, understood the implications of this assault on constitutional liberty. In a November 4, 1866, letter to Robert E. Lee he wrote, “I saw in States Rights the only availing check upon the absolutism of the sovereign will, and secession filled me with hope, not as the destruction but as the redemption of Democracy.... I deemed that you were fighting the battles of our liberty, our progress, and our civilization; and I mourn for the stake which was lost at Richmond more deeply than I rejoice over that which was saved at Waterloo.” "

    Isn't it funny that a British aristocrat understood things better than a lot of Americans, and only 83 years after the Revolution.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo