On The Question of Debt *same enemy then as now”

Posted by Dobrien 11 months, 3 weeks ago to History
19 comments | Share | Flag

In terms of shaping the society we live in today, these are possibly the most significant events in pre-modern Anglo-Saxon history. The most fascinating characteristic of this 800-year timeline is the common thread that interweaves these events together. That common thread, is the City of London.

We will pick up from where we left off in Part 2, and look at the ongoing legacy of the 1871 Treaty of Washington. Not only did this treaty circumvent America’s ability to use its Constitution, it set in motion a series of events that destroyed the sovereignty of almost every nation state around the world, giving birth to the bastard-child of evil, which we know as the World Economic Forum.

On The Question of Debt

In Part 2 we showed how America lay in financial ruin after the Civil War:


1

The US government had promised to pay back its enormous war debt in specie (gold and silver). With a nation in collective mourning and economically destitute, how was this ever going to be repaid?
Understandably, Americans were pissed after the Civil War. However, their red-hot anger was not aimed at each other, but the British Empire, which had publicly declared itself neutral with respect to the war:


2

This was no trivial matter. This was not just about gun-running; it was also about trade. One of the ships, The Lee, successfully completed 21 trips for the Confederacy. On each occasion, approximately $2,000,000 of cotton was shipped to London, with the return trip delivering an equivalent value of weaponry and ammunition for the Confederates3.

This was exceptionally poor form by the British. Their blatant support for the Confederates, while publicly declaring their neutrality, cost hundreds of thousands of lives. The extra two years of bloodshed compounded a blowout in the nation’s fiscal balance sheet, eventually leaving America owing billions to foreign bond investors.

The Americans were licking their wounds, but they were also fired up and ready to annihilate the British for their treachery:
Early attempts to resolve this dispute were unsuccessful. At one point, a claim was made that Britain
was responsible for half the cost of the war, and that the US would consider Canada proper payment.
This shocked the British and they realized they had better come to some agreement soon.

This dispute became known as “The Alabama Claims”, and conflict could have erupted at any moment, but there was something far more ominous brewing; something that frightened the living daylights out of international investors:
Consider this situation from an investor’s perspective. If Britain violated their declaration of neutrality, the United States could argue that they aided the South in a rebellion. If proven, all government debt owned by Britain, or issued in Britain, would be “held illegal and void.”

If there was even a hint of this scenario unfolding, British holders of US government bonds would immediately sell their bonds at any price, as would speculators who could see the writing on the wall. Bond prices would collapse into the abyss. If this happened, those who invested in Civil War bonds would suffer huge losses; this included Otto von Bismarck, the Prussian Chancellor of the future Reich.

At this point in history, America had just lost 600,000 fighting age males, who all believed they were fighting for the survival of their country. Within this context, if every-day Americans could use the Public Debt Clause within the 14th Amendment to give a massive “fuck you” to the British for prolonging their Civil War, would they? If we contemplate the miserable financial position most Americans were in at the time, not only would they have supported it, they would have demanded it.

Bismarck, and every other Prussian speculator, must have roiled at the thought of Americans using their own Constitution to solve their dispute against the British. If the US patriots were successful, their investments and the promise of riches from US Government bonds would be destroyed.

Something had to be done to avert this situation; something that would settle all the disputes between America and Great Britain; something that ensured that the US Constitution, and especially the pesky Public Debt Clause, was not activated.

Kiss and Make-Up

With billions at stake, and the threat of America taking the Dominion of Canada from the British Empire, urgent action was required. America was a government “of the People, by the People and for the People”. The enlightened despots in Europe could never accept that the American people could decide their own destiny, and in the process, use their Constitution to declare their public debt to the British null and void.

The 1871 Treaty of Washington averted this potential catastrophe for foreign bond investors:

Right from the get-go, the intention of the treaty was to put an immediate end to ALL disputes between the United States and Britain:


7


8

If we look at the true outcome of the treaty, Britain was found guilty of violating its declaration of neutrality during the war, and therefore aided and abetted the Confederates. Rather than using the 14th Amendment, the United States received a net compensation payment of $10 million. The US Naval Institute determined that British involvement in the Civil War cost 400,000 and 2 extra years of brutal conflict. The $10 million America received as the outcome of the treaty amounted to approximately $25 per extra life lost.

$10 million was nothing compared to the $2.3 billion of national debt that needed to be paid back, with interest, in gold and silver. Repayment would only be possible with the blood, sweat and tears of future generations of Americans, from the North and the South.

On the world stage, America got recognition for their claim against the British. But the retribution was a joke. Why? Because the United States agreed to the Treaty of Washington, and Article 35 of the treaty gave the final word to a Prussian king who had just been crowned the Emperor of Germany.

In other words, because the Kaiser said so!
SOURCE URL: https://prussiagate.substack.com/p/1871-part-3


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 11 months, 3 weeks ago
    The "Mother Country" was certainly a "M.F....."
    We've never had a break and have never been treated with honor and honesty.

    Kind of like the plight of "Mankind": We never had a chance with evil at our tails from the get go.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ allosaur 11 months, 3 weeks ago
      Thanks OUC~~
      Me dino always been a good student of Civil War history both in and out of schools and leaned that Great Britain preferred to do business with the Confederacy . . . but only now at age 76 do I learn the rest of the story.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by 11 months, 3 weeks ago
        It sure would have been nice to get Canada instead of endless debt. Weird this isn’t taught in school.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by $ allosaur 11 months, 3 weeks ago
          It is weird. ain't it? Whoa, I now digress. Back then "ain't" wasn't in the dictionary or why I was told not to use that redneck word. Well, now it IS in the dictionary, now ain't it? So~~ha!
          I was also about to agree it would have been nice to have Canada when yet another new thought slammed on the brakes.
          Imagine Justin Trudeau as an American politician competing with Buydumb and Gavin Newsom to be our next president.
          What scares me dino a lot more is Michelle being elected to Puppet-In-Chief King Barry's fourth term. (Or how the Dems can get rid of Kackles Kamala without Woke jokes screaming racism).
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 11 months, 3 weeks ago
    Maybe if the war criminal Lincoln had tried diplomacy (and compromised to halt
    taxes that were designed to destroy southern businesses) instead of unnecessary
    war all the lives taken would have been spared and the country would not have
    been destitute and desperate.
    BTW, the 14th "amendment" was not properly ratified by enough states to be law
    because all the confederate states were controlled by paid sympathizers who did
    not represent the people living in the southern states. It's still invalid today.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 11 months, 3 weeks ago
      👍🏻 nice addition to the historical context of this post. “War is a racket” War Is a Racket is a speech and a 1935 short book by Smedley D. Butler, a retired United States Marine Corps Major General and two-time Medal of Honor recipient. Based on his career military experience, Butler discusses how business interests commercially benefit from warfare. Would Banksters have a business interest?
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by freedomforall 11 months, 3 weeks ago
        Of course, and their interests were defied with Lincolns creation of Greenbacks.
        QED, Lincoln was assassinated. Banksters don't like being betrayed.
        Kennedy created Silver Certificates and was assassinated.
        I wonder if the administration can 'administer' the federal reserve
        (and 'temporarily' disband it due to an 'emergency'.)
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by $ CBJ 11 months, 3 weeks ago
          Kennedy did not create silver certificates. They were around as early as 1886, and by the 1920's silver certificates were the dominant form of $1.00 bills in general circulation. By the time I was spending money in the 1950's, silver certificates were the only kind of $1.00 bills being produced, and quite a few $5.00 and $10.00 bills of the time were silver certificates also. So that could not have been the reason that Kennedy was assassinated.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by 11 months, 3 weeks ago
            JFK assassination theory:
            Jim Marrs, in his book Crossfire, presented the theory that Kennedy was trying to rein in the power of the Federal Reserve, and that forces opposed to such action might have played at least some part in the assassination.
            Marrs alleges that the issuance of Executive Order 11110 was an effort by Kennedy to transfer power from the Federal Reserve to the United States Department of the Treasury by replacing Federal Reserve Notes with silver certificates.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by 11 months, 3 weeks ago
            Executive Order 11110was issued by U.S. President John F. Kennedy on June 4, 1963.

            This executive order amended Executive Order 10289 (dated September 17, 1951)[1] by delegating to the Secretary of the Treasury the president's authority to issue silver certificates under the Thomas Amendment of the Agricultural Adjustment Act, as amended by the Gold Reserve Act. The order allowed the Secretary to issue silver certificates, if any were needed, during the transition period under President Kennedy's plan to eliminate Silver Certificates and use Federal Reserve Notes. Kennedy repeated his calls for Congress to act on several occasions, including his 1963 Economic Report, where he wrote:

            I again urge a revision in our silver policy to reflect the status of silver as a metal for which there is an expanding industrial demand. Except for its use in coins, silver serves no useful monetary function.

            In 1961, at my direction, sales of silver were suspended by the Secretary of the Treasury. As further steps, I recommend repeal of those Acts that oblige the Treasury to support the price of silver; and repeal of the special 50-percent tax on transfers of interest in silver and authorization for the Federal Reserve System to issue notes in denominations of $1, so as to make possible the gradual withdrawal of silver certificates from circulation and the use of the silver thus released for coinage purposes. I urge the Congress to take prompt action on these recommended changes.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Posted by $ CBJ 11 months, 3 weeks ago
              ”Marrs alleges that the issuance of Executive Order 11110 was an effort by Kennedy to transfer power from the Federal Reserve to the United States Department of the Treasury by replacing Federal Reserve Notes with silver certificates.”

              This theory by Marrs does not make sense to me, since it appears (see below) that Kennedy was trying to do the opposite – replacing silver certificates with Federal Reserve Notes (which actually began happening in 1963 prior to Kennedy’s assassionation).

              ”The order allowed the Secretary to issue silver certificates, if any were needed, during the transition period under President Kennedy's plan to eliminate Silver Certificates and use Federal Reserve Notes.”
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ CBJ 11 months, 3 weeks ago
      ”Maybe if the war criminal Lincoln had tried diplomacy (and compromised to halt taxes that were designed to destroy southern businesses) instead of unnecessary war all the lives taken would have been spared and the country would not have been destitute and desperate.”

      Maybe if the Southern politicians (including many of the Founding Fathers) hadn’t insisted on maintaining and enforcing the “right” to “own” other people, all the lives taken would have been spared and the country would not have been destitute and desperate.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by mccannon01 11 months, 3 weeks ago
    Now I wonder what payola certain American "plenipotentiaries" were getting behind the scenes to agree to screwing We The People. Cynical me, I guess.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo