The God of the Machine - Tranche 37

Posted by mshupe 1 year, 3 months ago to Economics
5 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

Chapter XVIII, Excerpt 1 of 3
Why Real Money is Indispensable

In applied mathematics, you must describe your unit. With a gold unit of value, labor hours and material and everything that goes into the whole process can be reckoned by a common measure. They must be reckoned somehow so the prices on the goods will show what can be bought for any given sum in currency. The material used for money must be durable, divisible, incorruptible, portable, not easily imitated and found in nature. There is never enough money in the Society of Status.

What is most astonishing, the enemies of civilization have openly declared their intention to destroy it and how they mean to do so. The threat is cited by J. M. Keynes: “Lenin was certainly right. There is no subtler, surer means of overturning society than to debauch the currency. The process engages the forces of economic law on the side of destruction.” There is an implicit assumption that seizure of gold does not make any difference. If that is true, why do governments seize gold?

The verbal language of a high civilization is also a precision instrument. When words are used without exact definition, there can be no communication above the primitive level. If those who are supposed to express or influence “public opinion,” writers, economists, and pedagogues think in concepts of savagery, what can be the outcome? To break down the high energy circuit of the Society of Contract, those who are to be destroyed will deliberately carry out the program of ruin.


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by VetteGuy 1 year, 3 months ago
    I re-read this chapter a couple of days ago. The number of "quotable quotes" is astonishing. Thought my hi-liter would run dry!

    IP's grasp of the things that are going on today, given that this book is from 1943, is as amazing in it's own way as AS is, from being written in 1957.

    Her grasp of things that were logically obvious in 1943, the errors that she sees, that our political class STILL does not understand, is astounding and terrifying. Printing nearly unlimited amounts of fiat currency cannot end well.

    Maybe we need a new T-shirt: "God of the Machine - It was ALWAYS non-fiction"
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
    • Posted by 1 year, 3 months ago
      Yes! Yes! Yes! Great observation, and once we study and understand Objectivism, it's not hard to see why the ideas are timeless. Once Paterson and Rand were able to identify the essentials, the structure falls into place. They start with A is A. Existence exists. This universe is all there is. Reality prevails. The Law of Causality cannot be ignored forever. Anything else is arbitrary and ultimately impotent. We can live wonderful lives if we were to only embrace reality. Of as Dr. Peikoff said once about Objectivism, just ask, "Is it true?" Nevertheless, this book is not Objectivism. It was not written by Ms. Rand and it does defer to the divine as the prime mover for free will.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by VetteGuy 1 year, 3 months ago
        I had read that IP and AR were actually good friends for a while. Apparently the friendship ended at least partially over IP's belief in God vs AR's atheism. Too bad they couldn't work it out. Can you imagine some of AR's later non-fiction if there had been a collaboration!
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
        • Posted by 1 year, 3 months ago
          Yes, in fact I think they were quite close. More specifically, Paterson was Rand's mentor, and they collaborated a lot. As mentioned in the introductory post to this series, Rand wrote of The God of the Machine that it was to capitalism what the Bible was to Christianity and Das Kapital to the Reds. Certainly, there was an irreconcilable difference over the existence of the divine, but I think the bigger problem was Paterson's acidic personality. She insulted nearly everyone, including her allies, as time went on.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
  • Posted by 1 year, 3 months ago
    There is never enough money in a Society of Status because there is no respect for the nature of money and there are no limits on the desire for the unearned.

    From paragraph two, the forces of economic law on the side of destruction are on the demand side. Think of this when nearly every economic forecaster cites GDP as their metric.

    From paragraph three, "pedagogues think in concepts of savagery, what can be the outcome?" It helps to think in the debasement of language as the Return of the Primitive. The same is true of the barnyard ethics of racial identity.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo