Lots of good information. I disagree with some, but mostly quite plausible. I've burned up my time watching the whole video so not much time for a lengthy comment. The Creature From Jekyll Island is still alive and well.
WW I was primarily caused by the bank of England and Deutchebank. The Bank of England needed it to get the government to cover their debts. Deutchebank used it to get rich.
Stunning on first viewing. A second American Revolution will only be successful if the majority of graves available are filled with these banking elite.
From the Masons to the Templar Nights through to the Black [IG]nobility and the Rothchilds and others that made their fortunes upon wars they started, promoted or supported. Such is the state of parasitical humanoids.
Interesting notes: Alexander Hamilton was lauded in the new Broadway play. Why? He favored a central bank... The First and Second Banks of the US existed solely to siphon money from the private sector into the hands of bankers and nearly bankrupted the nation - each time. It's defeat by Andrew Jackson is about the only thing he did as President I applaud the man for. Abraham Lincoln wasn't the tyrant some claim if he defeated the attempt to install another central bank in the US - which he did. The Bank of England was BROKE in the early 1900's because of it's own monetary policies. It needed the cover of WW I in order to distract the public and get Parliament to write off its debts. Germany wasn't the enemy in WW I - BRITAIN WAS. Woodrow Wilson wasn't nearly as naive as this paints out. He sold out to the One World Government people and was their champion in the United States long before he ever became President. If that quote is accurate and he didn't really realize what he had done, then he was an even greater fool: blinded by his own ideology and thoughts of an "energetic executive." Hmmm... Reminds me a LOT of modern Democrats! The collapse of Germany's Weimar Republic was caused by inflation. Inflation can ONLY be caused by government and in no other way.
Going to disagree somewhat regarding Hitler. He was no military or economic genius. He was an ideologue and shill. Germany changed its currency out in order to basically escape the bankruptcy enforced on them by Britain and France as a result of the Versaille Treaty. Naturally once the nation could control and use its own production it was going to flourish - for a time. Then the rest of Germany's bad policies began to rear their ugly heads - socialism the biggest one - and the crackdowns on certain political groups and scapegoats happened because of the inevitable crumbling of Germany's economy, but this time at the hands of the party in power. Now this happened to coincide nicely with the Bank of England's second liquidity crunch. With their debt relieved from WW I and their policies destroying England, the Bank again put itself in liquidity problems due to its own policies. War was the only subterfuge to get another round of debt forgiveness passed and to devalue the British Pound Sterling.
Kennedy's actions to end the Central Bank are a matter of record. And it was the CIA - backed by the Central Banks - who carried out the hit.
Bretton Woods was in actuality an exercise in imperialism by which the US looted the rest of the post-war world.
If he's going to bring GMO into it, he needs to provide the same quality of evidence as with everything else. Barring that it's a nothingburger. Same with Israel's "belligerence." No substantiation whatsoever. The real facts of the matter are that the "oil-producing nations" in the Middle East have nothing economically on Israel. It's not even remotely close. Israel is a leader in software design and innovation and I CHALLENGE the author to demonstrate where Israeli "aggression" hasn't been fomented first by the Arab nations. The author wants to paint everything as economic when in the Middle East religion is THE biggest factor. This extends to Iran and Sudan, which are dominated by Islam - a fact that the author conveniently ignores.
"The problem with the central bank system is that it creates more debt than there is money with which to pay it off." 110% AGREE It is a complete scam designed to allow looters to loot with complete impunity and immunity from conviction.
👍 great comments, blarman. The other video I posted makes an attempt at 'answers' to some of your comments, but be prepared for a lot more unsubstantiated speculation. In spite of that (and the length of the video), it is an interesting speculative video.
I recommend Gulchers view it.
Such is the state of parasitical humanoids.
Let that sink in.
Alexander Hamilton was lauded in the new Broadway play. Why? He favored a central bank...
The First and Second Banks of the US existed solely to siphon money from the private sector into the hands of bankers and nearly bankrupted the nation - each time. It's defeat by Andrew Jackson is about the only thing he did as President I applaud the man for.
Abraham Lincoln wasn't the tyrant some claim if he defeated the attempt to install another central bank in the US - which he did.
The Bank of England was BROKE in the early 1900's because of it's own monetary policies. It needed the cover of WW I in order to distract the public and get Parliament to write off its debts. Germany wasn't the enemy in WW I - BRITAIN WAS.
Woodrow Wilson wasn't nearly as naive as this paints out. He sold out to the One World Government people and was their champion in the United States long before he ever became President. If that quote is accurate and he didn't really realize what he had done, then he was an even greater fool: blinded by his own ideology and thoughts of an "energetic executive." Hmmm... Reminds me a LOT of modern Democrats!
The collapse of Germany's Weimar Republic was caused by inflation. Inflation can ONLY be caused by government and in no other way.
Going to disagree somewhat regarding Hitler. He was no military or economic genius. He was an ideologue and shill. Germany changed its currency out in order to basically escape the bankruptcy enforced on them by Britain and France as a result of the Versaille Treaty. Naturally once the nation could control and use its own production it was going to flourish - for a time. Then the rest of Germany's bad policies began to rear their ugly heads - socialism the biggest one - and the crackdowns on certain political groups and scapegoats happened because of the inevitable crumbling of Germany's economy, but this time at the hands of the party in power.
Now this happened to coincide nicely with the Bank of England's second liquidity crunch. With their debt relieved from WW I and their policies destroying England, the Bank again put itself in liquidity problems due to its own policies. War was the only subterfuge to get another round of debt forgiveness passed and to devalue the British Pound Sterling.
Kennedy's actions to end the Central Bank are a matter of record. And it was the CIA - backed by the Central Banks - who carried out the hit.
Bretton Woods was in actuality an exercise in imperialism by which the US looted the rest of the post-war world.
If he's going to bring GMO into it, he needs to provide the same quality of evidence as with everything else. Barring that it's a nothingburger. Same with Israel's "belligerence." No substantiation whatsoever. The real facts of the matter are that the "oil-producing nations" in the Middle East have nothing economically on Israel. It's not even remotely close. Israel is a leader in software design and innovation and I CHALLENGE the author to demonstrate where Israeli "aggression" hasn't been fomented first by the Arab nations. The author wants to paint everything as economic when in the Middle East religion is THE biggest factor. This extends to Iran and Sudan, which are dominated by Islam - a fact that the author conveniently ignores.
"The problem with the central bank system is that it creates more debt than there is money with which to pay it off." 110% AGREE It is a complete scam designed to allow looters to loot with complete impunity and immunity from conviction.
The other video I posted makes an attempt at 'answers' to some of your comments,
but be prepared for a lot more unsubstantiated speculation. In spite of that (and the
length of the video), it is an interesting speculative video.