The God of the Machine - Tranche 18

Posted by mshupe 1 year, 5 months ago to Government
17 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

Chapter IX, Excerpt 2 of 2
The Function of Government

For a civilized economy, extending through time and space, there must be an agency to witness long-term contracts. This is why savages have no occasion for formal government. This function is performed by a constitution, which establishes a limit beyond which government has no legitimate power. The governor has no part in getting up steam, producing energy; and as a mechanism, it is a release instrument. The moral faculty is in the individual.

The first thing a government does is to issue an edict or law. No edict or law can impart to an individual a faculty denied him by nature . . . it cannot bestow intelligence. There must be an enabling clause which appropriates money or material from taxes laid upon private resources. Government is necessary for economic relations over time and space . . . in so far as the individual inhibitory faculty is not exercised. The creative processes do not function by order, but death can be ordered.

Government is an agent, not an entity. Rights are by definition inalienable; only privileges can be transferred. There is no collective good. Good is obtained by reception and mastery of the forces of nature, and through voluntary association. The greatest good of the greatest number is a vicious phrase. Man has natural and social relationships, which are also of the spiritual order. It is the spiritual possibility which the collectivist society forbids expression.


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by j_IR1776wg 1 year, 5 months ago
    Every government or empire that has ever existed can be evaluated and its rise and fall measured by comparing them against this chapter.

    "Government is an agent, not an entity." The evil inhabitants of government can whip a man and make him work. They cannot whip him and make him think or create.

    It is distressing to think that America, the land of Individual Rights, is following the same path to dissolution and destruction as every other government or empire regardless of type or philosophy.

    "...Government is necessary for economic relations over time and space . . . " Those who have inhabited the halls of government, whether voted in, hired on, or by force of arms have never been able or willing to limit themselves to performing just this function. Sooner or later arrogance, greed, and power lust presage the decline.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
    • Posted by 1 year, 5 months ago
      Sadly, those attracted to government will never evaluate their individual or collective performance this way. They will ignore this, and when confronted, dismiss it and degrade it and despise it and criminalize it. America's Founders knew that and did their very best in the context of their era.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by j_IR1776wg 1 year, 5 months ago
        Perhaps we can begin our revolution by creating a new Federalist Papers. Having the experience of observing 247 years of the Founders ideas in action and watching the attempts to twist and cancel them, we might make a new start where Ayn Rand left off "Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of production and trade..." only adding specific enforceable punishments for those who attempt to violate and exceed their enumerated powers..
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
        • Posted by 1 year, 5 months ago
          Such as Capitalism: The Unkown Ideal. America's Founders and John Locke et al did not have the benefit of the Industrial Revolution to formulate an even better structure.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by j_IR1776wg 1 year, 5 months ago
            I think a re-write of the Constitution is in order and a line needs to be added to the DOI. Yes, it is most important that we take advantage of the ideas of Rand and Paterson, et alia in order to build a Constitution based on Individual Rights.

            The tether line on the actions of government employees needs to be explicitly spelled out and a specific mechanism designed to be triggered whenever their actions exceed the limits imposed on them.

            Congress should be controlled in their ability to off-load their responsibilities to unaccountable unelected bureaucrats and contractors.

            The power of the currency should be in private hands with only the proviso that the money be commodity based (gold and silver) so anyone holding that bill can easily determine its value.
            G. Edward Griffin had a plan on how this might be accomplished in his book The Creature from Jekyll Island.

            Even if we only end up with is a framework for a future Constitution based on Individual Rights, we will have opened the door for recovery after the coming collapse.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
            • Posted by 1 year, 5 months ago
              At the same time, a Constitutional Convention would be a dangerous thing. The worst part may be the implied surrender of the greatest government structural document ever devised and the moral principles it embodies. I think it makes more sense to get rid of Cabinet Departments that are blatantly unconstitutional, the Fed, and the income tax. Those are political remedies, but the true problem is ethics and epistemology.
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
              • Posted by j_IR1776wg 1 year, 5 months ago
                I sometimes feel as though I am baying at the moon.

                John Adams wrote in 1815 “But what do we mean by the American Revolution? Do we mean the American war? The Revolution was effected before the war commenced. The Revolution was in the minds and hearts of the people; a change in their religious sentiments of their duties and obligations. … This radical change in the principles, opinions, sentiments, and affections of the people, was the real American Revolution.”

                Could the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution have been written if the ideas and ideals articulated by the Founders weren’t in “the minds and hearts of the people”? I would say no! The energy provided by the support of the people was integral to that “greatest government structural document ever devised”.

                That energy is sadly missing in America 2023 along with the ethics and epistemology necessary to rekindle it.

                Yes, you are correct. An attempted Constitutional Convention would be a dangerous thing – aborted in the womb – with no chance of success as you and I would define success viz. based on Individual Rights as the highest value.
                Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
                • Posted by 1 year, 5 months ago
                  You nailed it. This is the essential problem. No one knows or cares or lives as John Adams described, including the flag waving conservative evangelical types. Have you read Brad Thompson's masterpiece America's Revolutionary Mind? In addition, a strong case can be made that the provenance of Americanism during the Enlightenment is not English, but Dutch. In particular, Adriaen van der Donck and his mentor, Hugo Grotius.
                  Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by VetteGuy 1 year, 5 months ago
    On the second page in this chapter, Paterson makes the comment that "physics has no name for the exact function which is delegated to government"

    Based on her discussions in this chapter, and specifically her comparison of government to a brake or governor, I would suggest that in terms of physics, government might be seen as friction or entropy. Not productive, but inescapable (at least above the level of savages).
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
    • Posted by 1 year, 5 months ago
      Interesting thought, but it may be more useful to differentiate ideal government from all others. Because physics describes a universe that is intelligible and certain, and most government is subjective and emotional, that may be what she was getting at.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by j_IR1776wg 1 year, 5 months ago
      Physics is the study of the inanimate, Biology the study of the animate, and Psychology the study of the animate possessing the phenomena of consciousness is how I remember Ayn Rand describing the three basic sciences. If my memory is correct, Paterson's comment quoted is also correct. Ascribing physical concepts to governments is a dead end.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
  • Posted by 1 year, 5 months ago
    Government delimited by the primacy of the individual . . . The human mind does not respond to force . . . Good government is an agent of the man's spiritual nature.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by VetteGuy 1 year, 5 months ago
    Re: Inalienable rights, I like the way she has defined "alienated": "passing into the possession of another". This makes more sense than the definition I had seen other places that Alienated simply means "taken away". Her examples further illustrate the point.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by VetteGuy 1 year, 5 months ago
    "This function is performed by a constitution, which establishes a limit beyond which government has no legitimate power."

    Unfortunately, our "representatives," in at least two branches of government, don't seem to realize this. They have no problem extending their reach well beyond the limits imposed by our constitution. The fact that these acts are beyond the "legitimate" bounds of government seems to make no difference.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
    • Posted by 1 year, 5 months ago
      I think its worse than that. Since WWII Congress has transferred its legislative authority to the Executive. Hundreds of agencies with rule making and police power for career bureaucrats is the 800 bazillion pound gorilla. Cancel all federal govt pensions would cull the herd. Watching the squealing binge would also be fun.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by VetteGuy 1 year, 5 months ago
        I agree with you on the government agencies making rules. Personally, I'd like to see any rule not SPECIFICALLY passed by congress have a sunset of 5 years (at most) and a moratorium on new non-congressional rules. I would also like to see each piece of legislation address ONE issue. No more hiding the crap under a thousand pages of garbage.

        Can I get a pony with that, too ;-)
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo