Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by mccannon01 2 years ago
    Interesting question, LibertyBelle. Let us know if you find an answer.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 2 years ago
      I'm not sure why that was so. There was also at that time, I believe, a distinction made between an "Objectivist" and a "student" or "supporter" of Objectivism; I think that (at least at that time), if one was in fundamental agreement with Objectivism, he should call himself, not an "Objectivist", but a "student" or "supporter" of Objectivism; that "Objectivist" applied only to one who was certified (like Leonard Peikoff, or Harry Binswanger.) but after Ayn Rand died, Harry Binswanger said he had dropped this distinction. As I recall, Ayn Rand said in a speech she made shortly before she died, "If you agree with some tenets of Objectivism, but disagree with others, do not call yourself an Objectivist; give proper authorship credit for the parts you agree with, and indulge in any flights of fancy you wish, on your own."
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo