Is there anything the MSM COULDN'T refuse to report?
If someone could prove with court documents that Illicit Omar did in fact marry her brother and therefore stayed in this country illegally, would the MSM just sit on it and hope nobody showed that proof to the rest of the country or tried to ridicule it if it was made public?
If there was irrefutable proof that Paul Pelosi was having a sexual relationship with David DePape and that Pelosi wanted to break it off, DePape refused to leave, Pelosi called the police, and DePape only attacked him when he saw the police at the front door, would the MSM refuse to cover it?
And if there was also proof that the Wicked Witch of the West knew full well her husband was involved in this relationship with DePape and approved, would the MSM keep it quiet?
If there was DNA proof that Bill Clinton has multiple children resulting from his many trips to Jeffrey Epstein’s estate, would the MSM try their best to bury it?
If somebody could produce concrete proof—evidence that would stand up in court—that the Clinton Machine had a body count nearing triple digits, would the MSM conspire with the Clintons to increase that body count by one, and suppress everything?
If there was undeniable proof that our addled disphit president ordered a nuclear strike against Florida, could the MSM hope to keep that under wraps?
My question: Is there anything that would be so bad, so severe, so harmful to the left that the MSM couldn’t ignore it? Is there anything they would reluctantly be forced to acknowledge and report, knowing that it showed Dems for who and what they really are?
If there was irrefutable proof that Paul Pelosi was having a sexual relationship with David DePape and that Pelosi wanted to break it off, DePape refused to leave, Pelosi called the police, and DePape only attacked him when he saw the police at the front door, would the MSM refuse to cover it?
And if there was also proof that the Wicked Witch of the West knew full well her husband was involved in this relationship with DePape and approved, would the MSM keep it quiet?
If there was DNA proof that Bill Clinton has multiple children resulting from his many trips to Jeffrey Epstein’s estate, would the MSM try their best to bury it?
If somebody could produce concrete proof—evidence that would stand up in court—that the Clinton Machine had a body count nearing triple digits, would the MSM conspire with the Clintons to increase that body count by one, and suppress everything?
If there was undeniable proof that our addled disphit president ordered a nuclear strike against Florida, could the MSM hope to keep that under wraps?
My question: Is there anything that would be so bad, so severe, so harmful to the left that the MSM couldn’t ignore it? Is there anything they would reluctantly be forced to acknowledge and report, knowing that it showed Dems for who and what they really are?
They would sooner call a turd a bowl of chocolate pudding before admitting their side is wrong.
Expecting the MSM to expose the corrupt and perverted is not rational, imo.
Goodbye Norma Jean.
"A little revolution is a good thing." -- Thomas Jefferson