One item of importance: Whether a law or rule is unjust it will remain standing until challenged.
I'm working on a methodology to turn tables. Reverse the roles of Plaintiff and Respondent. I know, and can prove, through written and video evidentiary, that laws were broken over the past two years, by ALL elected Officers in my county.
US 21 360bbb is about informed consent and the right to refuse the application of an unapproved medical product (a mask).
Americans With Disabilities Act; Title III prohibits discrimination based upon perceived or actual medical disability, including contagious and non-contagious disease (Jan 2017 updated) .... and by none other, leading the re-write ..... Elizabeth Warren. She also had the same language proposed in the Air Craft Carriers Act for the same time reference as well as the end of the 2019 session.
Officers who elected to break these laws, knowledgeably or not, publicly or behind closed doors (conspiracy), allowing other Public Accommodations or Public Entities to do same, resulting in individuals or organizations to impersonate Licensed Medical Doctors or Police Officers (Class H felonies with substantive penalties) restricting or confining private citizens from expressed Rights and Privilege, must either by penalty of prosecution or willful refutation of the Acts, correct the record, because of their Oaths Of Office to uphold [C]onstitutions.
I, an aggrieved Party, attached by contract of taxation to Corporate Public Entities, have contractual rights to withdraw from such contracts when they are breached.

By putting the municipality in position of Plaintiff .... They have to tell on themselves. Not a good position and no court involved.
I am looking to legal counsel that this may be "tight" in application.