‘Harmful Language Alert’: National Archives puts WARNING LABEL on US Constitution and Declaration of Independence
Posted by freedomforall 3 years, 4 months ago to Philosophy
Of course the anti-white, socialists employed by the treasonous fedgov must destroy the very essence of individual liberty.
Excerpt:
"The link on the label leads to the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) statement on “potentially harmful content,” defined as reflecting “racist, sexist, ableist, misogynistic/misogynoir, and xenophobic opinions and attitudes” or being “discriminatory towards or exclude diverse views on sexuality, gender, religion, and more,” among other criteria.
The archivists are told to inform the users about the presence and origin of such “harmful content,” update descriptions with “more respectful terms” and make “an institutional commitment to diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility.”
It was unclear when the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights were labeled as potentially harmful. Back in July, during its traditional reading of the Declaration on the anniversary of its adoption – July 4, 1776 – National Public Radio added a disclaimer for the very first time, saying that “the words in the document land differently” after “last summer’s protests and our national reckoning on race.”"
Excerpt:
"The link on the label leads to the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) statement on “potentially harmful content,” defined as reflecting “racist, sexist, ableist, misogynistic/misogynoir, and xenophobic opinions and attitudes” or being “discriminatory towards or exclude diverse views on sexuality, gender, religion, and more,” among other criteria.
The archivists are told to inform the users about the presence and origin of such “harmful content,” update descriptions with “more respectful terms” and make “an institutional commitment to diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility.”
It was unclear when the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights were labeled as potentially harmful. Back in July, during its traditional reading of the Declaration on the anniversary of its adoption – July 4, 1776 – National Public Radio added a disclaimer for the very first time, saying that “the words in the document land differently” after “last summer’s protests and our national reckoning on race.”"
Treason.
Me dino equates this Marxist move as sprinkling kerosene on a republic's founding documents that domestic enemies fully intend to burn.
This is an oh so hopeful attempt to psychologically tenderize something to be ultimatelty cooked and viciously devoured.
I still have yet to see a "harmful content" warning on CRT crap being forced upon us.
https://thegreggjarrett.com/national-...
"Big tech and its moral “alerts” are at it again, and this time it’s against the United States Constitution. The http://archives.org website has been flagged with a “harmful language alert” appearing on many of its pages. The alert then links to a page entitled “NARA’s Statement on Potentially Harmful Content.”
The alert appears at the top of the page, and the linked National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) “statement on potentially harmful content” is described as:
reflect racist, sexist, ableist, misogynistic/misogynoir, and xenophobic opinions and attitudes;
be discriminatory towards or exclude diverse views on sexuality, gender, religion, and more;
include graphic content of historical events such as violent death, medical procedures, crime, wars/terrorist acts, natural disasters, and more;
demonstrate bias and exclusion in institutional collecting and digitization policies.
The National Pulse points out, “Bizarrely, the warning does not appear on a page about Jim Crow, which has no fewer than 6 uses of the word “N_gg_r.’ Nor does it appear on a page with the word ‘k*ke.” It does, however, appear on the page with the United States Constitution.
One subparagraph is titled “How is this material described, and why are some of the terms used in the descriptions harmful?” Lists the following:
Archivists choose what language to use when describing materials. Some of these descriptions were written many years ago, using language that was accepted at the time.
Archivists often re-use language provided by creators or former owners of the material. This can provide important context, but it can also reflect biases and prejudices.
Archivists often use a standardized set of terms, such as the Library of Congress Subject Headings, to describe materials. Some of these terms are outdated, offensive, or insensitive.
In the past, the National Archives has not had standards or policies to help archivists avoid harmful language."
The documents were written with God in their hearts,making them necessary to destroy from a Satanist's standpoint.
Funny, but up until only a couple of generations ago, this was the operating principle in the US. I personally think that the welfare system is probably one of the greatest evils perpetrated upon this nation because it encourages sloth and taxes the industrious to support them. It is a form of slavery.
Someone has a plan. It is not dumb-ass-Joe. Some group is fundamentally manipulating a massive transition, starting with the military, who are subjects to POTUS. Never before been this level of subversion in the US. It is akin to a Marxist revolution.
Who has the courage to oppose the evil empire?
However, with my strong feelings, this article is wrong and misleading! I went to the national archives website, and the entire website has the warning on it. Not specific documents. Their warning is general in nature, and in no way is singling the Constitution out as a document with hate speech. Please, people, this place is supposed to be full of those who actually use their brains! Don't become a mob, believing the bad just because it sounds like it should be true. Real truth is needed more than ever in the world. Not the lies that are shrouded in truth. That's what they're doing! That is the way of the devil. God and good are always based in truth. Don't go over the edge with them.
In my opinion, this is not a case of mere incompetence; it is a case of purposeful anti-liberty propaganda.
We are not becoming a mob. The criminal mob is in Washington DC. We investigate and the truth can be found. The National Archives ARE in FACT issuing warnings on the pages of the founding documents. That is the truth.