- Hot
- New
- Categories...
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
- Marketplace
- Members
- Store
- More...
http://articles.latimes.com/1995-07-17/e...
Actually, I thoroughly enjoyed (and own) both movies, along with a large number of other fictions and fantasies. I don't look to Hollywood for fact, just entertainment.
This movie show that engineers and inventors are heroes who accomplish amazing things.
They brought in a small team that was already familiar with the domain of the problem. Then they asked capable people to do super human things (problem solving wise). Multiple groups worked on different aspects to gt a solution that really worked.
I have seen similar things done several times in my career in business. Where 'adding resources' beyond those that the team can quickly and logically assimilate just makes for to many cooks in the broth kind of problem, and nothing gets really accomplished.
I went to Basic, AIT (Heavy Weapons Infantry), OCS (so I could afford my house payment), spent a year as Asst S3 in a towed 105mm unit at Fort Sill, and a year in Vietnam as XO of an 8-inch and 175mm Self Propelled Battery. Did I make the right choice? Other than the truth about heat, humidity, and bugs (plus snakes, scorpions, and few tigers) I think I did. Even at my old age (from 24-27) while in the servcie I learned a lot about people and about the world. I think it's something every American should experience, but then again I'm probably prejudiced.
PS - My ex wife traded that T-Bird in on a Biscayne while I was over there. I cried when I got a letter from the new owner wnating to know what had been done to it. He was doing a full professional restoration. Two tops (hard and soft), Yo-Yo Kit, Spinners, Portholes, Tuck and Roll, Telescopic Steering, damn I wish I had it back. But then again I finally got my Corvette a few years ago at age 70 (me, not the Corvette). And it's got an Atlas Shrugged sticker on the back. http://lh5.ggpht.com/-d9cPvHvnJmkuSEkddH...
Thanks for posting!
As a computer scientist/programmer/engineer (mechanical by training) I know that we need to re-think problems from scratch, but we should do and evaluate the 'new' ideas with understanding the older ideas and implementations so we don't throw out the 'baby with the bath water'.
IMHO we got scared when a shuttle or two went down. As a society we are so 'event risk adverse' rather than being 'system risk averse' (we would rather lose a few thousand people a year in cars than less than a dozen in a shuttle crash or 300 in an aircraft crash). We have also traded 3000 lives (think 9/11 here) for 10,000 or more service peoples lives, let alone non-combatants on the 'other side'. -- I am not pro or anti-war. War, like any other endeavor of humanity, is just another balance we all need to reach collectively our value equation balance. I just wish we had had a Reagan around to deal with them.
Back in the Apollo era, vehicle technology could be compared by the $/lb, and still can be. Think mid '60s, $1/lb for a car ($3000 for a 3000 lb car), $10/lb for many aircraft - was not far off, and spacecraft was considered to cost about $100/lb.
Today, roughly 50 years later with inflation, cars are $10/lb (cheap 2000 lb car for $20K), 1200 lb personal aircraft for $120K is not unusual, so we can extrapolate toe $1000/lb for spacecraft doesn't seem to far fetched to me. A 100,000 lb spacecraft costing $100Million isn't to far off, and possibly low. The russians are making $$ sending our 150# astronauts into space for $80Million each (but that does cover all costs, just like we have to cover with any transportation means). We seem to be going for quite a bit less for 'non-live' cargo especially that don't need to be retrievable, like the re-supply ships we have beenb sending, but I don't have the numbers currently available.)
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/article...
Bush 43 tried to give us a new 'mandate' but it didn't hit all the right chords to resound through the nation. BO has done his best (probably un-intentionally or unknowingly, but that part doesn't matter - I don't give him much credit for being more than a figurehead, but he might be) to discard NASA as irrelevant.
I don't know (haven't followed that closely) the NASA/Muslim link you suggested. If it is true, this is another BO program that boondoggled to be something irrelevant from BOs perspective.
IMHO, NASA needs a new 'moon mission' - a large goal with more than minimal funding and wide base support from individuals, scientists, and politicos. It must have a national goal other than 'just pride' in mind. 'Just defense' projects haven't flown since the '50s when ICBM bunkers were built. The Interstate Highway System (FDR started, but was credited mostly to Eisenhower) was a defense system that has had HUGE payoff to the public both directly and commercially (while being more or less still good for defense, depending on who you ask).
If the new 'moon mission' is Mars, Saturn, Alpha Centauri or wherever, we still need a national (and even international - but that is harder to deal with - check out the ISS) goal that is 'big' to accomplish as a people.
The only thing welfare did that was 'good' was to hand out the stockpile of gov't cheese and clean out the warehouses we really didn't need. LBJ did that. They just kept up the handouts past the already subsidized cheese state (or anything else that was long term perishable or had to be stored because of price supports).
The closer you get to the truth the more liberating the experience.
hey! where have you been lately?
DVD for your tv's DVD player. will mail a copy
to any gulcher who will promise to show it
to children who might not ever learn
the real story, otherwise.
no cost. DVD-R, 40 minutes. -- j
https://www.youtube.com/static?template=...
have inadvertently crossed a line. my apologies. -- j
p.s. I used Freemake video downloader, and
Freemake video converter -- came in as an MP4
and converted "to DVD" -- that was the option
used. maybe personal use is ok.
p.p.s. I have sent a memo to YouTube asking for
permission to give out free copies. will update as
a reply may be received.