Interesting precedent. For the past 15 years I was pretty sure vaccines would be what splits this nation. Let's see how that works out now. The problem only really arose when they started to try to mandate vaccines for adults...just as I knew it would.

Well the propaganda machine clearly will make sure sheeple have no clue what is going on.
Some tidbits here:
Threats: "If the federal government did want to pursue mandating vaccines, the more realistic scenario is to tie it to federal funding or tax individuals who refuse to vaccinate. The Supreme Court upheld the individual mandate in the Affordable Care Act, signaling to Wilker the tax may be permissible."
Carrots: ""In either case, that does not mean an individual could be vaccinated against their will if they were willing to suffer the consequences of not doing so," Wilker said."
More threats: "It's possible Congress could have the power to mandate a vaccine under the commerce clause since the virus travels across state borders, constitutional law experts told Newsweek. The question is whether that power actually includes the power to require vaccines and Steven Wilker, a partner at the law firm Tonkon Torp, told Newsweek that it would likely be a "reach.""
Generic Carrot and Stick: "State and federal governments can't force people to receive a new coronavirus vaccine against their will, experts said, but lawmakers may be able to create a mandate that imposes consequences for not being vaccinated."
And the ultimate threat:
"The federal government could also leave the decision up to states. In the 1905 case, Jacobson v. Massachusetts, a citizen argued forced smallpox inoculations infringed on his personal liberty. The Supreme Court upheld the Cambridge Board of Health's authority to require the vaccination under the 10th Amendment that grants state police powers.

As it's still a "perfectly good law," Laurence Tribe, a Carl M. Loeb University Professor at Harvard Law School told Newsweek. The answer to whether states could mandate vaccinations, he said, was a "clear yes.""



https://www.newsweek.com/coronavirus-...

Methodist Hospital (which has bunches of money) better be sure they have a 'Dick Deguerin' type lawyer! Researching the NLRB and the fact these vaccines haven't been cleared by the CDC and people have been dying? Oh this could be the biggest class action we've ever seen. Are they excusing people who have had the virus and prove to be 'negative' every time they are tested? This action could be misconstrued as 'intentional harm'. Doesn't the Hypocratic Oath say, 'First, do no harm?'

Lets look at some data:
Judge: Lynn Nettleton Hughes (born September 9, 1941) is a United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. His federal judicial service has been hallmarked by being one of the most reversed judges in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. His repeated misconduct was noted by the Fifth Circuit on May 6, 2021, in an appellate opinion that sua sponte reassigned the case in addition to reversing Judge Hughes. See United States v. Khan, F.3d (5th Cir. 2021).

Well Wikipedia seems to think this dude has some issues.

The case also seems to be a real test between 2 HUGE concepts: Can you be forced to poison yourself because the state says so?
Can the state make false claims (there is ample reason to doubt a boatload of stuff about Covid, the vaccines, and all the events surrounding it, including whether a lot of "deaths" were from other causes, and then conveniently labeled as so), and use that to justify poisoning you?
Can your employer fire you, if for no reason, other than you refuse to be poisoned by them with a unapproved medical device?
Just what are the rules around unapproved medical devices? Seems there is a lot of variation between whether you can be required to get something labeled a "vaccine" that is not approved, has never been shown clinically safe, has more deaths and cases of serious side effects than any other vaccine in history.

The Judge is one of the most turned over judges in the court system, so this will no doubt go up the food chain, I am betting there will be a stay order issued so Methodist cannot take action until the SCOTUS hearing happens, because this will go to them, I have no doubt.

I'm surprised that a federal judge would make a ruling this libertarian. I don't especially like the outcome, but I expect that the marketplace will make them change it unless the hospital industry is too overregulated to allow the market to work. Which it may be.

What I'm more afraid of is that the fake president will use the military to start injecting people by force. That will directly start a war.

Unconstitutional and completely corrupt judgement.
Impeachment and disbarment for the judge who clearly doesn't support the US Constitution or the Bill of Rights.

Its a working condition set by the employer. If the employee doesnt want to abide by it, he is free to find another job

The worker just needs to quit and find a more reasonable employer.

Does OSHA not have a say in this as I believe their statement was that the company becomes liable for all consequences if it mandates this "vaccine" and their employee suffers from the jab.