Definitely worth watching. She attempted to talk over him but he shut her down and said what needed to be said, exposing her as the media hack she is/they are.
Looks like a ticket emerging for 2024. Owens/VanDerVeen or VanDerVeen/Owens. Or maybe Trump/VanDerVeen! TrumpJr/VanDerVeen?
VanDerVeen talks softly and carries a big stick! I like the way he can so calmly slice 'n dice the opposition.
Edit add: Imagine if you will a President VanDerVeen at a WH press conference looking the MSM right in the eyes and slowly meticulously drilling a hole right into their skulls.
he wouldnt waste his time doing press conferences. But, if he did, the press would have to respect him and might actually start asking legitimate questions and waiting for him to answer.
VanDerVeen is nothing short of a "Class Act"! I did watch him get riled during the hearings but he had every reason to blow a fuse a few times. No, he is not a politician and men of his stature are sharp enough to remain as far away from the swamp as they possibly can.
The reporter just got owned and she knows it. She's even so bought into her own narrative that she tries passing it off on the departing guest as a cheap shot. Just cringe-worthy.
It IS definitely worth watching! Ironically, I just watched it elsewhere in my email before coming directly here to see it in "Hot In The Gulch." Your correctly described CBS hack really knows how to smile.
Here is one for ya: On Saturday, the Senate voted to approve witnesses in the impeachment trial even after they had agreed to no witnesses. But that is just par for the course for Democrats. Just look at how many promises Joe Biden has broken in less than three weeks, with many more to come. But, then a funny thing happened.
After the Democrats and Republicans that are the same as Democrats insisted they had to call witnesses, they decided not to. What changed so quickly? How could something so vitally important (According to Democrats and RINOs) be cast aside so quickly? The answer is quite simple.
Trump’s lawyers announced they were going to call Nancy Pelosi and Muriel Bowser as witnesses and they could not afford for that to happen. They would have had to answer some really tough questions.
They were warned about possible riots in advance but turned down 15,000 Guardsmen Trump offered several times. Not only would they have to explain why they refused help, but House managers would also have to explain why someone who wanted a riot would want to bring in 15,000 National Guard troops to make sure no riots would occur. Both knew there was a threat, yet neither one wanted protection against the possible threat. They would have also had to explain what the FBI reported about left-wing groups being involved.
the whole thing was a sham that cost us millions and made the USA look stupid. Putin and Xi must have gotten a good laugh at the whole process, at our expense.
VanDerVeen talks softly and carries a big stick! I like the way he can so calmly slice 'n dice the opposition.
Edit add: Imagine if you will a President VanDerVeen at a WH press conference looking the MSM right in the eyes and slowly meticulously drilling a hole right into their skulls.
Your correctly described CBS hack really knows how to smile.
Yes, approve of Trumps final selection of Lawyers.
After the Democrats and Republicans that are the same as Democrats insisted they had to call witnesses, they decided not to.
What changed so quickly? How could something so vitally important (According to Democrats and RINOs) be cast aside so quickly? The answer is quite simple.
Trump’s lawyers announced they were going to call Nancy Pelosi and Muriel Bowser as witnesses and they could not afford for that to happen. They would have had to answer some really tough questions.
They were warned about possible riots in advance but turned down 15,000 Guardsmen Trump offered several times.
Not only would they have to explain why they refused help, but House managers would also have to explain why someone who wanted a riot would want to bring in 15,000 National Guard troops to make sure no riots would occur. Both knew there was a threat, yet neither one wanted protection against the possible threat. They would have also had to explain what the FBI reported about left-wing groups being involved.
https://www.thebeltwayreport.com/2021...