- Hot
- New
- Categories...
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
- Marketplace
- Members
- Store
- More...
I was listening to Shelia Jackson (the D. Houston Rep) talk this morning on the news about all the wonderful stuff her district is getting from this new "rescue" package. What a shameful person she is, promulgating a shameful, immoral law.
Perhaps the only way to avoid the problem is to not choose someone.
As far as who should choose, being old enough does nothing to guarantee that people choose wisely. Therefore the only wise choice would be to have a contract with the governing officials that could be enforced against those who claim authority; such as a constitution. Which America has but it has been turned on its head and is now used to enforce the demands of the governors on the governed.
On occasion, in his writing, Heinlein made a naive suggestion. This was one of those occasions. While service to the country could be an admirable trait and might provide some useful experience, there is no correlation of service to ability to think rationally about political issues. Starship Troopers was,iirc, a voluntary system, however.
Drafting people is using force and suppressing free will. It is the way of dictators, not free people.
Actually, the way the Marxists are heading in this country the winning candidates will be pre-selected by the Party and elections won't matter anyway. Elections will continue to be held and require mandatory participation, but won't actually do anything but make the sheeple believe or pretend they've done something.
Americans exceptional? Prove it People. Defend your liberty.
Pick a date people are adults, and then they are adults. End of story.
Like you in Texas, this is the way it is SUPPOSED to be done.
The Congressional reactions (both emotionally and in legislation) to the last election remind me of dysfunctional parents excessively punishing their children because the parents hate each other.
They are very afraid of the voting public and of reality.
I know this idea has a horrible racist history, and maybe it wouldn't work. I just think it would be better if it were harder to vote. I would be cautious, though, that politicians would take advantage of a test or other requirements to undermine their opponents.
Letting anyone vote (regardless of age) without ability to think rationally, or without the experience to make a rational decision, or without the understanding of the true history of the constitution and bill of rights, socialism, free market capitalism, monarchy, corruption from power, and many other things is utter foolishness and a recipe for disaster. This is what changes to the original constitution that have widened suffrage and expanded government political power have wrought. Expanding suffrage to more irrational beings is more foolishness.
I think so too, but people say the test will invariably be manipulated by those in power to stay in power.