- Hot
- New
- Categories...
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
- Marketplace
- Members
- Store
- More...
We crossed THAT bridge a long time ago.
He has lit the rocket of the "Fourth Reich"
Do as we say
Take what we hand out
Believe what we say is best
"You" are no body, "We" are ultimate
* We are royal (Aristocracy), so live your life as we deem it appropriate.
Sounds like Hitler's doctrine doesn't it.
You know who YOU are. I know who I am. That is all that really matters. The US Collective is moving into a fog. But you? No.. Me? No.
You and I are who we want as individuals, who you and I are.
Members of the Gulch, I ask you. Are you participants in the US Collective?
So chill out, I was supporting you in a way.
But in closing, how do YOU define "we" as it relates to your life?
I was responding specifically to the "we" I interpreted in diessos' comment about 'we are becoming a country.' In this context, as I watch the impeachment trial, I am seeing things and attitudes, and hearing words and thoughts that I never really knew people actually believed. I guess one of the things that - as a conservative - bothered me, was always the idea that "if they saw what we see, they wouldn't feel that way." And what I am learning now is that they are thinking the same thing about us. Whether they believe what they are actually saying, I don't know, but they certainly are dramatizing it. Some of these people should be nominated for Academy Awards. I realize that's not really an answer to your question, but I hope it somehow explains the context in which I was using the word "we" in that comment.
Of course I have other contexts and thoughts about "we." Which I will think about as I cook dinner, which is next up.
This is being done like the the attack on President Trump, to set the tone that if you go against them they will come and get you and make you pay a price. It's not about the person they target, it's about making an example of them so the next person will be to afraid to do something.
They want us to bend a knee and be forever silent in any opposition. This will not work out for them, like anything they do they never take into account the law of unintended consequences. This will not silence people it will stir them up
https://needtoknow.news/2021/02/feds-indict-pro-trump-twitter-troll-ricky-vaughn-over-tweets-during-2016-election/
https://www.theverge.com/2021/1/27/22...
Note that this is going back to 2016!!! This will go nowhere as it is total BS....but the victim here...that is right I said "the victim"....will have his life ruined and his finances drained with this kangaroo court charge. This is total "1984", Stalinist style use of the organs of the government to punish political opponents. Note the the FBI lawyer that falsified an affidavit to the FISA Court got a smack on the wrist!!! We are living in insane times. I am afraid it will get worse.
When conflict happens, will the members of the National Guard actually defend the swamp?
Serious...
Now, will the parents (Greatest Generation) of these "keyboard warriors" stand in their defense while selling out their ideals?
Serious...
In actuality, my parents were of WWII stock. So a better clarification would be, would Boomer Parents, the ones that didn't buy into Alinsky's contempt, stand up for their wayward offspring?
Would the Berkley Brand of Boomers actually take up arms?
Both have read Rand. So they have concepts that are foreign to the average Millenial (Gen Y).
* Going back to your comment, if they won't stand in conflict, just who will?
https://nypost.com/2021/02/04/defense...
A National Guard of like minded individuals would indeed carry out their orders. Just look back at how the park rangers were eager to implement Obama's orders when he did his park shutdown. And that was without going through the ranks weeding outsoldiers that don't fit the profile that they want
Too lazy to actually believe in their own words. Absolutely.
Too weak to stop their ingestion of "poison"? Let's see where that takes them.
"memes 10 years prison"
Knowing is half the battle. Don't have an online presence. Lay low. Gain knowledge. Make a lot of money in silence. Take care of your family and your health.
They are certainly monitoring the internet and are keeping track of where everybody's hearts are. You can even see that in the testimony today on the impeachment of Trump. They are quoting all kinds of chat quotes from Trump supporters as evidence that Trump is guilty of things he never did. You bet they'll twist, strech and mangle the truth based on whatever tidbits you place online for them.