An Angry Repressive idiology created by Angry, repressive unhappy People.
Culture
September 30, 2020
Why Marxist Utopian Dreams Always Fail
By Annie Holmquist
3 min
September 30, 2020
Why Marxist Utopian Dreams Always Fail
By Annie Holmquist
3 min
Karl Marx - a miserable drunken ne'er do well who hated actually working for a living. He was a moocher and con man who's only skill was flowery academic language skills used to fool anyone who would listen to his drivel. The closest he could ever get to being happy was finding a sugar daddy to pay his way through life.
Friedrich Engels - a self-loathing spoiled rich kid control freak definitely messed up in the head. His greatest need was to find someone - anyone - that could make him feel good about himself.
The partnership made in hell - the con man moocher and the hating rich kid. They'd never be happy and anyone captured by their spew wouldn't be happy either.
So, there you have it in the nutshell.
Liberty requires an awareness and understanding of personal responsibility.
Dale Halling and I had quite a go-round over this years past.
Miss his and Kalli's presence....with very fond memories.
20% of the culture wants to be: "What ever they will"...at any given moment...without consequence.
I know of no dimension in space where that possibility exists.
This is an interesting honors thesis from a youngster at Eastern Kentucky U, Arthur Martin. https://encompass.eku.edu/honors_thes...
"Liberalism was doomed from its inception as all ideologies are.
The question to ask then is, why is it the case that ideologies will fail? According to Deneen, Liberalism is not the only modern political ideology. Fascism and Communism are the other failed modern ideologies. The root failure of ideology is its philosophical anthropology. Ideologies are based on falsehoods about human nature, and anything based upon a lie is doomed to failure. Due to the falseness of their premises, ideologies are ultimately incapable of keeping their promises. While an ideology may be initially successful, as time progresses, the gap between the claims of ideology about lived human experience and the actual lived experience of human persons widens, and the regime instituted by the ideology loses legitimacy.3 When an ideology comes to that crucial breaking point, it has two options, “Either it enforces conformity to a lie it struggles to defend, or it collapses when the gap between claim and reality, finally result in wholesale loss of belief among the populace."
That idiot-ology certainly fits that bill.
Sorry this was so long, and that I chose to keep it the length that it is. I guess I'm prioritizing a desire to share thoughts over the thought that I should leave people alone.
In short, no matter what we do or create, we are working within a biological/physical/quantum system we took no part in creating...in other words, getting too big for our pants usually bites us in the ass. Laughing.
I'm saying that in-between those two points, (the beginning and the end,)... "the sky's the limit", (another ole saying), which will likely keep us busy and creative for eternity.
I explain that in contrast to my work, discussing those that cannot, will not, could never be conscious, have a proper conscience and have no mutuality with mankind as a whole...I call them: Parasitical Humanoids and they have plagued our path forward since, just after the beginning, what ever that was..
I'm curious about the parasitical humanoids, and whether there's a point past which they can't return, in regards to their world-view. In a general sense, I haven't figured out how I'd address the problems their emptiness creates. And in a more concrete sense, I also don't know what I'd do if I were to run into one on the street (I'm thinking antifa) and accidentally out myself as....I'm not really sure. Whatever they don't like.
Introspection is achieved when both sides of our bicameral brains cooperate. For the creatures we are looking at, it seems, like many leftest and psychopaths, use only 1/2 the brain. Our old testament biblical ancestors were similar in that respect but only in the sense that they were not aware of their own awareness nor the voice of self; thought of as the voice of others: gods, rulers or ancestors. The only thing that kept them from the abyss was their fear of unseen forces. That changed for a small section of the population about 2500 to 5000 years ago; (think the Greek Civilization). To this day, only about 50% worlds population attained some respects of self introspection. Still, the majority of others have the possibility to gain that awareness but to date have not.
And about your 50% ratio, it's a shame that self-awareness/introspection isn't mentioned much in schools today. Math, science, history, art and all that are important, but so is learning how to think critically. I've seen a lot of teachers tell students on the 1st day of the semester we need to develop critical thinking skills, and then never give us any examples of critical thinking during the semester. And surprise surprise, students' responses to questions in class don't get increasingly thoughtful throughout the year, mine included.
All those subjects you mention have customarily only required compartmentalized information...had schools, at an early age, taught students what all that compartmentalized information means to them and the big picture, students would become integrated. More than likely, that integration would combine all those subject areas...this is what the "Mind" does, it integrates. The Brain can only compartmentalize.
I have a little ditty where I use an English Grammar phrase to demonstrate what true full integration looks like: Remember, Me, Myself and I ?...Me is the brain inside the body of myself, made whole, conscious and connected by the "I" and/or the Mind.
"I" in this context means, a cosmic or quantum sovereign entity with a unique identity.
You see, I theorize that we are made of the very quantum fields we physically exist in...therefore, our individual Minds are intertwined with these fields just outside our heads, our bodies...it's the only way one could achieve Self Inspection, a view of self...from outside the body. So far, science has not identified anything in your head that can view or judge itself.
Also...where could "Insights" come from?,... thoughts, theories, knowledge one has no academic right or foreknowledge of...can we say...wave transfers between entangled particles?...Science does say that wave transfers Are the transfer of information, does it not?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SMJpB...
Most of us know but it's a good one to listen and send on to others...especially the young.