Fox News panel reprimands Newt Gingrich for mentioning George Soros in discussion about BLM riots

Posted by Idiocracy42 4 years, 3 months ago to News
8 comments | Share | Flag

"...Progressive district attorneys are anti-police, pro-criminal, and overwhelmingly elected with George Soros’s money. And they are a major cause of the violence we are seeing because they keep putting the violent criminals back on the street.”

Host Melissa Francis pushed back immediately, telling Gingrich, “I’m not sure we need to bring George Soros into this.”

“He paid for it,” Gingrich responded, prompting host Marie Harf to defend Francis.

“No he didn’t,” Harf claimed. “I agree with Melissa, George Soros doesn’t need to be part of this conversation.”

“OK?” a puzzled Gingrich said after an awkward silence. “So it’s verboten?”

A longer silent pause then ensued before host Harris Faulkner ended the segment.

“OK, we’re going to move on.” ..."
SOURCE URL: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/fox-news-panel-reprimands-newt-gingrich-for-mentioning-george-soros-in-discussion-about-blm-riots


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by $ allosaur 4 years, 3 months ago
    Fox News "is fair and balanced" so shut up and sit down you Soros not part of my conversation little Newt you.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by freedomforall 4 years, 3 months ago
      Not surprised at all given who was the "moderator" and who was on the panel. Part of Fox's pretension of fair and balanced. It's all part of the conspiracy to get the people to fear each other and let the deep state keep stealing assets and liberty from the people.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ gharkness 4 years, 3 months ago
    Thank you for posting that. I had actually created a post, but I couldn't get a link that would work properly, so I finally just deleted mine. But I really do want people to see this (was afraid for a while it had been "disappeared.")

    I don't get where these people get off telling others that are legitimately on the show that what the speaker (in this case, Newt) says isn't allowable. And while I deplore the fact they can do that, I am SO GLAD that what they did is so widely distributed I know now it won't get "disappeared."
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo