The two of them - Soros and Hussein - were the closest of buddies, Soros throwing a lot of money on his election and re-election. Soros was a regular in Hussein's WH. No question "advising" him how to ruin the country. Soros must have been the one sending Hussein to England to agitate against Brexit and threaten them they would "have to go to the end of the line" should they vote to exit.
The Brits are investigating Soros now b/c he put in $3 million to sabotage Johnson's election.
Compare the appeal of Boris Johnson's personality with the appeal of Corbyn who Labour put up. Corbyn is not even a wokist but a throwback to 1920s Stalinism. If $3m was not enough, how much would need to be spent? A question Soros may be asking for next time, unless he 'mellows' with age.
"“Next to my fantasies about being God, I also have very strong fantasies of being mad,” Soros once explained in a British television interview. “In fact, my grandfather was actually paranoid. I have a lot of madness in my family. So far I have escaped it.”
He did not escape it. He is a madman incarnate and society is not doing anything to contain him.
His deadly tentacles are strangling the globe. Some countries took action and banned him but he is still hugely influential, thanks to his huge reserves.
The old goat should be helped to transfer to another world where he should be more at home.
Clearly a Consienceless Psychopath. Yes, some psychopaths do have a conscience...this one does not, that's obvious. The Fact and observations of his Hubris makes him THE Most dangerous entity in the universe next to satin himself.
That Worldly Conscience he feels?..is a made up one...one that somehow makes him think he fits in...that's the Real hubris showing...
Just think...he is but one... ... of the one percent.
In his book Soros on Soros, the would-be god says: “I do not accept the rules imposed by others.” Soros is an icon, but there many more of people like me who are Soros'es with three fewer zeros in our net worth.
"icon only in the imagination of the left." He's an icon, and one that's separate from partisan politics, but I don't know if the man measures up to the myth. He talks about encouraging open societies and supposedly donates part of his fortune to the cause. I admire that.
"He's an icon, and one that's separate from partisan politics, "
LOL! You truly believe that?
I suggest you study his moves in Europe than make up your mind how he is separate from partisan politics. It would help if you removed your partisan glasses that makes you see only what you want to see.
Donates part of his fortune? Do you understand how that works? Zuckerberg donated his fortune to charity. It is a tax trick that means nothing in reality, only on paper.
Donating money is not nothing. I have heard this line that it doesn't matter if it's a deduction. It certainly matters. In the case of Soros, I don't know how much of it's for show. I read his book long ago. He at least says he promotes open societies around the world. I try to do the same with my much more modest wealth. It's easy to condemn the efforts as insufficient. I admire people who do something, even if it's not perfect.
Doing some research on Soros activities around the world would help. Did you bother to understand why is he banned from countries around the world?
You read his book? Did you also make an effort to find out of what realty is, which is NOT in his book? Do you agree that he is a God as he thinks of himself?
You can donate money to many causes. You can donate money to causes that are aimed at enslaving generations. Open society is nothing more than propaganda to enslave the world in favor of global interests. You should have a critical mind to be able to see that.
Did you also read by Soros how he elaborated about the emotionless and guiltless process of making money? Nothing matters, no human lives, no pushing countries into poverty, only the financial gain? Do you think his Open Society is to benefit mankind?
If you believe that then you have no points of argument.
"Do you think his Open Society is to benefit mankind?" I don't know know if he's effective at it, but I know liberty and pluralism benefit humankind. I cannot evaluate his philanthropy. I'm just supportive of the cause.
What cause? That he is not doing it for free? Soros has never done anything for free. He is pressing the EU to take huge loans from him in support of his "Open Society" drive.. At a hefty interest.
Do yourself a favor: conduct a search before you commit to supporting "efforts" that are not what you think.
CG supported Hitlery and Obama. It is likely that CG knows about Soros efforts and supports them as a comrade - all the while pretending to be in favor of individual liberty. Actions are more revealing than words.
Speculating that I might not believe what I say is pointless ad hominem. It belongs in a religion that insists people really believe its dogma in their hearts. Its fitting the post starts out with stupid name-calling.
Soros supported Clinton and Obama, as I did. Electing particular candidates is a very small part of getting to reforms reducing gov't intrusiveness because unfortunately that issue doesn't have much traction. I don't see a single person, even a reincarnation of Ron Paul or Bill Weld (who's running this year!) doing the job alone.
The two of them - Soros and Hussein - were the closest of buddies, Soros throwing a lot of money on his election and re-election. Soros was a regular in Hussein's WH. No question "advising" him how to ruin the country. Soros must have been the one sending Hussein to England to agitate against Brexit and threaten them they would "have to go to the end of the line" should they vote to exit.
The Brits are investigating Soros now b/c he put in $3 million to sabotage Johnson's election.
If $3m was not enough, how much would need to be spent? A question Soros may be asking for next time, unless he 'mellows' with age.
The more of a throwback the better for the left.
The Dems in this country had solid ties with him. See Cortex.
He did not escape it. He is a madman incarnate and society is not doing anything to contain him.
His deadly tentacles are strangling the globe. Some countries took action and banned him but he is still hugely influential, thanks to his huge reserves.
The old goat should be helped to transfer to another world where he should be more at home.
That Worldly Conscience he feels?..is a made up one...one that somehow makes him think he fits in...that's the Real hubris showing...
Just think...he is but one... ... of the one percent.
Sweet Dreams...
Soros is an icon, but there many more of people like me who are Soros'es with three fewer zeros in our net worth.
He's an icon, and one that's separate from partisan politics, but I don't know if the man measures up to the myth. He talks about encouraging open societies and supposedly donates part of his fortune to the cause. I admire that.
LOL! You truly believe that?
I suggest you study his moves in Europe than make up your mind how he is separate from partisan politics. It would help if you removed your partisan glasses that makes you see only what you want to see.
Donates part of his fortune? Do you understand how that works? Zuckerberg donated his fortune to charity. It is a tax trick that means nothing in reality, only on paper.
Come up with facts before you are making a point.
Doing some research on Soros activities around the world would help. Did you bother to understand why is he banned from countries around the world?
You read his book? Did you also make an effort to find out of what realty is, which is NOT in his book? Do you agree that he is a God as he thinks of himself?
You can donate money to many causes. You can donate money to causes that are aimed at enslaving generations. Open society is nothing more than propaganda to enslave the world in favor of global interests. You should have a critical mind to be able to see that.
Did you also read by Soros how he elaborated about the emotionless and guiltless process of making money? Nothing matters, no human lives, no pushing countries into poverty, only the financial gain? Do you think his Open Society is to benefit mankind?
If you believe that then you have no points of argument.
I don't know know if he's effective at it, but I know liberty and pluralism benefit humankind.
I cannot evaluate his philanthropy. I'm just supportive of the cause.
What cause? That he is not doing it for free? Soros has never done anything for free. He is pressing the EU to take huge loans from him in support of his "Open Society" drive.. At a hefty interest.
Do yourself a favor: conduct a search before you commit to supporting "efforts" that are not what you think.
Actions are more revealing than words.
Soros supported Clinton and Obama, as I did. Electing particular candidates is a very small part of getting to reforms reducing gov't intrusiveness because unfortunately that issue doesn't have much traction. I don't see a single person, even a reincarnation of Ron Paul or Bill Weld (who's running this year!) doing the job alone.