Recent Comments

Totally agree. I don’t want our country to become another England and Australia where Muslims are setting the rules.

Seeing some of the politician/lawyers/judges in the news I'm thinking all some individuals have to do is pass the DEI exam and they will receive a box of crackerjacks with a law degree in it.

"...My ancestors migrated here legally, obeyed the laws, went to work, never took social benefits and loved the country that accepted them in" Maybe you should have that sign on your lawn!

Agreed! NONE of them were concerned with "due process" to sneak into our country, so why should Americans cough up the loot and the time to enact "due process" to throw them back out?! They should be grateful for a meal and a clean place to pee on the return trip.

Illegals also ask for a warrant when they are found and taken out to leave, but not a one came with even a birth certificate!

Carl, I laughed truly out loud over many of these.

Merry Christmas to You and yours!! Blessings

I just remembered a Customs Interview Question...

"Do you want a free Prayer Rug?"
1) Yes. [NO ENTRY]
2) No. I have one [NO ENTRY]
3) What's a Prayer Rug? (Welcome to the USA)

One of my idiot neighbors put up a sign "We are all Migrants"
My ancestors migrated here legally, obeyed the laws, went to work, never took social benefits and loved the country that accepted them in.

Unlike the Crimaliens who, after breaking and entering our Republic with drugs and children that are not theirs, they continually break laws, latch onto the public teat, and openly despise the country they saw fit to invade.

They are NOT MIGRANTS the are INVADERS and should be treated as such.
Arrested. Deported.

The Democraps are going to have to find another way to steal elections

Straight Up FUNNY.

Schumer, 1986. Trump should THANK HIM.

The WH Mug. Perfect.

But... This is your Boat on Drugs...
With a Law from the '80s

Dude... You are walking on water today!

I promise you.
Good Compliance Requires BOTH.

If you compromise yourself that they have the dirt on you, that only plays for so long. Because then each EXTRACTION they make from you takes a toll.

Now, if they EXTRACT compliance from you, AND reward you with $$$.
Then this eases the pain in a funny way. At least you got something for it.
And now you can convince yourself it's within your beliefs...

And now you are a happy lapdog, and not a hostage.

we are WAY past that time.
But at the least we should pass some laws that punish them, and then remove them.

If they are "randomly" selected for the same political party attacks (Moasberg) multiple times in a row.

One Political Injunction Per President Per Judge?

Again... The Death Penalty makes the most sense to me.

No 5 nailed it. Politicians promote a welfare state to get elected and stay in office and there in lies the heart of the problem. Term limits would be a good start to solving this problem!

Well done, OUC! Nicely composed collection. The set of #10, 13, and 14 clearly warn of the cultural shift - see Briton, France, and Sweden for examples. Those countries are also examples of what Friedman in #5 was saying - you can't have open borders AND a welfare state. #11 and others hints whose paying for it. It was a mess before Biden, but became a disaster during Biden. The left's plan is to bring down the country and all they've been doing is to reach that goal. Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, et al would be proud.

Uh-huh, dino, good observation. Methinks he's getting flushed. LOL

Lest we become overrun by haters like France and Great Britain, I'm all for running out all Muslims no matter how legally they got in.
No, I don't hate them. I just want to keep our Constitutional Republic and keep my Christian God without any of us having to get killed.
That's how Patton said Americans win wars when it comes to having to kill. So let's just avoid that war in the first place.

Me dino yam poet don't ya know it?

Well said, Dino Philosoraptor.

Thousands of illegals go home for the holidays. Let’s make that millions.

Hark we towelheads go to make jolly!
Falala lalala la lala!
Go to Minnesota to weasel a billion in money!
Falala lalala la lala!
Now we get to fly home for silly Santa ho ho holidays!
Falala lalala la--Hey/!
Hey, we no cana go be back to land of the free?
Fala fug dis!
(Especially when the ones who keep the money also always gets to tell the carolers to keep their money mule mouths shut. Or else!)
--------His Excellency Maestro Dino Philosoraptor Allosaurus Esquire Ph.D. BS version certified

Wow, the Somalian out does the Grinch !?!

Thank you for lightning my day, OUC.👍

That pitiful Puppet-In-Chief has been put back in the toy box to be forgotten. Or maybe the trash bin.
Me dino dunno.
Maybe I should flip a coin.
Oops, there's always a toilet handy.

Yes, we can tell how much the left really supported Biden by the speed and quantity of the library donations. He was just a tool to be discarded when no longer useful. The meme showing the media's concern with libel lawsuits rather than the libel itself is spot on. Amazing how Medura resembles Stalin and the jackass weeping over drug smugglers says a lot. I like the coffee mug, LOL!

Thanks, OUC, for this morning's wakeup.

Me a simple dino sez its law of the jungle common sense to kill killers who smuggles in anything everybody knows shall surely kill a lot of us.
And why capture killers libtarded Jackass Party judges shall surely D.E.I. pat on the heads an put on our streets to kill again?
Me dino sez blow ALL those death merchandising killers all to hell!
As an example to ALL!

[]The MDLEA is a U.S. domestic law that expanded the jurisdiction of the United States to conduct law enforcement operations against vessels suspected of drug trafficking on the high seas, especially those without nationality or whose flag nation consented to U.S. enforcement. The primary purpose of the Act was to address jurisdictional challenges in prosecuting drug smugglers in international waters.[]
[]The Act itself does not explicitly authorize the summary destruction of vessels. Recent military actions involving lethal force against suspected drug boats (in late 2025) have been highly controversial and have drawn criticism from legal experts and lawmakers, who argue that such strikes, absent an imminent threat to life or an active armed conflict, may constitute unlawful killings.[]
[]The justification for recent lethal strikes has been based on the assertion that certain drug cartels are "foreign terrorist organizations" and pose an immediate threat, allowing the use of force under the laws of armed conflict.[]
Lots of hemming and hawing here but what stands out to us is: These Drug Traffickers are Violent, Armed and in the act of evading arrest.
Trust that they were hailed prior to a Lethal Strike.