Recent Comments

I was able to uninstall it....

Just found copilot install on my 22H2 Windows 10 Pro install. looks like they decided to expand their reach.

If you are over 60 you have outlived your usefulness - unless you are a Deep State puppet like Buydem.
The fact that you worked and paid unfair taxes (that supported the parasites in D.C.) for 40 or 50 years doesn't mean anything.
You are no longer needed, and in fact, your memories of actual freedom are getting in the way of the planned enslavement of the entire population by the State.
"Thanks for your service. Now please drop dead."
[FYI, the above is sarcasm.]

You seem like a very sincere person, nonconformist. Good luck to you.

I found an Amazon Kindle ebook of Piaget's 1923 study for a very small price.

I'm sorry that this happened, that a certain people and their idiotic ideology drove them to use another people in this way. It will not happen again.

Good topic. I never heard the expression 'chummed the waters' before. I suppose it means the same as 'muddied the waters'; maybe worse.

It was a bit informal but I don't see how it was 'childish'.

Odd that you let a little bit of colorful language distract you from your argument on race. Interesting... In case you missed it; I was agreeing with you.

I saw an opportunity to proselytize the ideas of free market capitalism / anarcho-capitalism. I took it.

"Your desire that blacks obtain power and dominance"

That's actually the opposite of what I want. I was trying to say that NOBODY should be obtaining power and dominance over others.

"You have not even bothered to read those."

Guilty as charged. I'm going to have to get back to you on this. It might help if you can provide links to those posts, it would save me having to look for them.

"You do not understand what an ad hominem fallacy is."

It is attacking a person's character and appeal to emotion. You are saying I'm childish, my reasoning capabilities are stunted... without showing exactly how that is true. Even if that was the case, it doesn't matter. My stunted reasoning abilities must be preventing me from seeing how this is not a personal attack but a rebuttal of my arguments themselves.

I wish I could respond somehow, but it is rather difficult to respond to 'it's gibberish' argument. Maybe you can tell me which particular statement is not making sense and why.

It is true, I don't know exactly what you mean by 'anatomically modern human being'. Based on your post however, it seems to be one that possesses 'extended sense of foresight'. Still, it doesn't matter for the purpose of how I was using the term.

It would not be terribly smart to refuse to agree with provably true facts. "nonconformist" is a reference to not conforming to statism, which by the way is not only provably immoral but also just a mass delusion.

It appears that the writer of this article is wrong and completely naive.
The senate was just handed over to the neocons by electing longtime never-Trumper John Thune (R-SD) as majority leader.
So much for it just being the media chumming the waters. The Deep State/neocons will never give up power peacefully.

I say again for the millionth time:
D.C. is utterly corrupt. NIFO (Nuke it from orbit.)
It's the only way to be sure.

"You have no understanding of government."

I can say the same about you. People who advocate for the existence of the state don't realize that it implies illegitimate use of violence.

I am open to changing my mind if you can tell me what I am missing.

I couldn't find your comment on pattern recognition; I think it was you. But I want to elaborate on how NFL running backs are able to find those 'holes' their offensive line opens up for them, and run right through to the goal posts.

I believe they can see not just the pattern before them, but how that pattern is going to change in the very next minute. And they can do this instantaneously. As I said, I took the Ghanaian IQ test a few years back, and it was completely based on pattern recognition, and changes in those patterns.

I wonder if blacks then use this sense of pattern recognition in most of their thinking; if the 'pattern' or what they perceive as a pattern, even as an abstract analogy to a concrete pattern---more study needs to be done on this---seems to be different, they might react in ways that seem foreign to other people.

This reaction to a change in pattern would be the most valuable asset if one were to survive in a jungle environment, and would preclude the development of a slower, analytical type of thinking, where an observer would need to 'analyze' the situation confronting him, taking it apart in order to see the best way to deal with a change.

That's your problem. You THINK you are mounting a formal argument, but it is only a childish attempt at countering my statements.

You also, need to read Piaget. The young child, who doesn't argue, formally argue, uses simple affirmations, and if other children do not believe him, he resorts to ridicule, bullying, and other types of 'argument'. We refer to that as a quarrel.

Think carefully before using off-color language with me the next time. Should there be a next time.

How's that bakery going?

Thanks, Mr. Dobrien. I could use a little help once in a while. I sometimes forget that other people are not as 'attuned' shall we say, in the methods of logic and experimental science as myself.

But it is also true that these same people should do their homework instead of assuming they know everything and have been taught truth and facts.

Just in case I have confused people, by experimental science I mean the type of experiments undertaken by Michael Faraday and other western natural philosophers.

I get a little long-winded, and sometimes I think, boring, but my own experiences seem like good teaching experiences for others.

You make no sense, and your lack of decent language offends me.

I was not arguing. Are you unable to see that?

And by the way, my original topic: "Parting Shot" was not meant to evoke argument. It was posted to instruct the world, its leaders, and its peoples, of consequences in the future caused by actions in the present.

I can understand your need to counter my statements, even though those arguments, so-called, are childish and immature. For two reasons: Your desire that blacks obtain power and dominance (over other peoples) is paramount, and two, Piaget has already stated and observed what I have observed.

If you base your arguement and think it is correct because it’s “well established scientific principals” than you must believe in climate change. Strange your handle or name is nonconformist. non·con·form·ist
/ˌnänkənˈfôrməst/
noun
1.
a person whose behavior or views do not conform to prevailing ideas or practices.

You do not understand what an ad hominem fallacy is.

Unless you read the book I recommended: "The Thought and Language of the Child", by Jean Piaget, published 1923, you are not qualified to assume anything about my comments.

I have also made certain posts regarding Piaget's observations. You have not even bothered to read those. I do not have time to 'converse' with you.

You do not know what an 'anatomically modern human being' is.

The rest of your comment I assume is gibberish.