Recent Comments

AYAcoocookiller just jumped in my head.
Probably could keep this up all night.
Got way better thi9ngs to do.

Should be "AYAtoilet".

Those are the one's not wanting to cut your head off! Not wanting EVERYONE to be muzzies.
Don't know what parts of the koran they read because it seems every other page someone is cutting something off someone else!

Where do I go to find the not so radical Islam? Didn't know that existed even.

My dad did have this on a 78 record. I had the first couple of verses recognized and would sing them to the exhaust sound of my tractor when I was working in the field. He also liked Hoagie Carmichael's Stardust which was around that same era.

"Trusted news" my ass.

And they are still at it, but since I am not paying for it I don't care. This is one of the best things that has been done since Trump took office, and it's not just a matter of revenge. It's a matter of the idea that there's NO reason for us to pay for news reporting as a matter of routine - or at all. EVER.

Do they smoke some weed and vote D? Yes, the NYT has become a big Marxist machine.

Freaking AWSOME!!!!!

Trump said we might tired of all the winning. Nope, not yet!

I'm not a farmer, but in my area I'm noticing where there used to be corn, wheat, cabbage, etc. year after year the fields are now not planted. The only new thing showing up is solar panels covering more good farmland. It makes me wonder how expensive the Mamdani government grocery stores in NYC are really going to be when the stuff needed to stock the shelves becomes more scarce.

It baffles me how people (I have known in NYC) who have run free-market businesses successfully
for decades can be so utterly irrational when evaluating government and politicians.
The NYT has been very effective at gaslighting its readers.

The details I'm noting are not public.

Here is the sophomoric government site:
https://www.goldenfleet.navy.mil/

NYC is hoping that a Dem gets the WH in 3 years. THEN the bailouts will start.

No, I saw it, but I'd like to understand the details to be convinced that its economic.
I haven't found details online. If you can point me to some links, I'd appreciate it.
(I see the BBG47 as an example of Star Wars' death star.)

Yes to all, FFA.

Currently living in NYS means I have to file a NYS tax return and on it is a section dedicated to additional taxes levied on people who live in NYC, not to mention the added bureaucratic red tape in filing a return. I'm immediately glad I don't live in NYC. Add on what's going on there makes me even more glad that it's about 400 miles away. My first experience in NYC (ca 1990) was to witness a mugging in broad daylight where some members of the gang were acting as crowd control saying, "Stay back people! Can't you see there's a mugging going on here?". My wife and I were not only fearful, we were nonplussed at the cheekiness of the whole affair and the fact that so many people were just walking by like it was any other day. It was a rude awakening to say the least. We were being ushered by railroad personnel above ground between Penn Central and NY Central to catch a connecting train to Florida (don't have to do that anymore, thankfully). I have NO desire to ever go to NYC other than connecting train or plane. I know folks who go to NYC and have a good time, but I'd rather go salmon fishing on Lake Ontario - thank you very much.

I thought I explained how BBG-47 isn't a defenseless target. Did you miss it, or disagree?

Per congressional reports 95% of traffic through the Red Sea is Asia to Europe, not to the US.
Per industry statistics about 10% of shipments to the US went through the Red Sea and therefore affected.
As I stated above, Europe is the primary beneficiary of anti-piracy efforts there and US taxpayers bear the costs.
BBG47 is an overpriced sitting duck target. Perhaps Trump can put his golden name on some attack subs or
cyber systems instead.

Somali pirates absolutely affect US goods, and require longer force projection. However, shutting down pirates does not require BBG-47. That is for China.

I agree on the shipping consumption issue, but the location of the piracy (Houthis) currently
has little affect on US goods which cross the pacific unthreatened while Europe is the
destination of the shipping being threatened by Houthi pirates.

We agree on 90%
Except the USA consumes more than Europe.
We were/are always a primary beneficiary.
This is why China struggles when we stop buying as much.

But I've learned to let Trump be Trump. These are long term projects.
The Carrot. And I am watching him threaten their bonuses (the stick).
And that 50% "planned increase" may shrink once things change.
(Whatever they promise us ALWAYS shrinks before it gets to us).

Besides the 50% increase is 1/2 due to inflation :-)

But I would not be surprised to see Trump snatch that stuff away AFTER the midterms.
He cannot afford ENDLESS more attacks and still carry the house and senate.

Once he does, things will LIKELY shift back, but he needs the win to keep the wolves at bay.

As stated in a reply to Thor, https://www.galtsgulchonline.com/post...
I have no issue with some ships being built, but the type of ships that were effective in WW2
are sitting ducks today, and those are the ones that Trump appears to be promoting.
(Trump's ego shouldn't be a deciding factor in naval construction decisions.)
Dealing with piracy (which is a valid goal for naval power) does not require a CVN today.
Must American taxpayers always pay for such anti-piracy efforts when the benefits are often
primarily for European countries?
I agree, Trump has started to move the spending on defense toward actual defense of
American interests. Building an expensive navy of sitting duck naval war machines is
going in the wrong direction.
Increasing military spending by 50% as proposed today is utter foolishness.
(Sorry this has gone off topic.;^)

Me dino was a bit shorter when I first heard that.
It popped out of my memory banks while reading about Iran's stupid self-imposed water shortage.

Right! Voluntary, not forcing me to support it!!!!!!!!!!

There has never been a world economic leader without a dominant navy.

Too bad your cousin's husband didn't know Marxists make greedy coporatists look like amateurs when it comes to legalized theft. He went into a world where his labors coming from his talent don't belong to him because it belongs to "the people".

Yeah, it is nice to stick to the subject, but I look at these Gulch threads like conversations in my parlor where sidetracking is just part of the family dialog.