- Hot
- New
- Categories...
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
- Marketplace
- Members
- Store
- More...
But to follow the change in topic, the number one cause of generally poor and destructive education is ideas: the philosophical state of the culture, with a major influence from John Dewey and the Pragmatists, as in everything else intellectual in this country. That corrupts both the intellectual establishment controlling education and the parents.
Good home influence directly on children's education is a parental responsibility and a requirement along with proper curricula and teaching methods in the schools, requiring parents also to hold a rational, individualistic philosophy and sense of life themselves. The conservative mantra constantly inserted promoting faith and family is not a solution.
You have to ask whether busing was really for equalizing the racial makeup in schools, or was it just for the money, as schools get increased funding, the more students they have.
It made it impossible to create lasting friendships.
When the people you form connections with live many miles away, you can't afford to drive to see them (if you have a car) and you can't afford the toll call to phone across town, you can't really form friendships.
Forced busing used to be so controversial that it seemed to have been phased out. Now the Democrat 'progressives' are bringing it back, loudly promoting it and denouncing as "racist" anyone who ever opposed it, as if it had never been morally denounced for good reason.
It's one more bad consequence of government control over schools along with the lefts' own overt racism. It was pushed back in controversy for obvious reasons, but the premises were rarely challenged, which allowed it to come back once the left waited out the controversy that few remember today. Likewise for Affirmative Action racism.
They deliberately built schools too big and in the wrong places because a state bond subsidized it? Did the bond subsidy require a minimum size to qualify? Are some of the existing schools overcrowded or do they only want students designed for the wasted schools?