Self interest changes with circumstance. The purpose of life is continuity. Life continues through intake and process of energy, and progeny. If / when you have kids......this may change.
I agree with you completely! On my original post I was going to say "at the moment: no" but thought it wasn't necessary. Self interest changes and my answer might as well.
What is the tolerance or certainty here? I would like to know if only because I cannot view the final outcome. (Will everyone know I did it? Or will my sacrifice be anonymous? Just asking...) But accepting the challenge as stated in simple terms, my answer is yes.
What good would I do myself or any of my family being dead? I may die defending myself, my family or a friend but wouldn't ever consider sacrificing myself for anyone.
Not sure I should have replied, given the old man comment. :)
Previous comments...
Given that this is likely an emergency, yes. Rand herself said emergencies have an ethic completely different from everyday life.
So- no, I wouldn't.
It does not work that way.
Especially since you are Implying it was me who killed the population of the planet, whereas the initial question was an either/or alternative.
It is the methodology of the left. Projecting and blaming when there is no foundation for either.
(Will everyone know I did it? Or will my sacrifice be anonymous? Just asking...)
But accepting the challenge as stated in simple terms, my answer is yes.
Not sure I should have replied, given the old man comment. :)