Correct.

I cancelled the hard copy, now subscribing only to digital.

But it is a daily struggle not to pull the plug. With this latest stunt of restricting comments from people who are not buying into their anti-Trumper agenda, I probably don't want to pay them for it too long.

Is that a website where you can make comments on articles that the moderators would not permit on their site? That's a great idea. People are free to choose if they want moderated comments.

Of course there are no dissents on that page. There is no opportunity to comment. Did you read the note by the WSJ?

I believe WSJ is one of the publications that allows comments. The NYT banned them a long time ago.

The reason is obvious: readers are quite blunt about facts which may not be what the journal wants to see.

This censoring of comments came about after blistering fights between trolls and sane people, sometimes boiling over to include downright threats. First the Journal introduced the option to block commenters you did not want to read. When this did not bring the results, they clamped down on the option of commenting, by pulling it.

I received some crap stating:

"In our efforts to provide a space for a civil and respectful conversation, we limit the number of articles to match our moderation capabilities. We seek to offer conversations on a variety of topics that reflect the breadth of The Wall Street Journal’s coverage.

We are privileged to be a part of your daily routine, and will continue to bring you the news, views, resources, and service that you count on to stay ahead. Your business is appreciated. If you have any additional questions or concerns do not hesitate to contact us."

"Civil and respectful" when the WSJ is maligning the president day in and day out, just to name one example.

Martha McCallum always trips the switch for me. I can't watch her for a second. Her loudmouth idiocy is really a strain on anybody's nerves.

“Censorship” is a term pertaining only to governmental action. No private action is censorship. No private individual or agency can silence a man or suppress a publication; only the government can do so. The freedom of speech of private individuals includes the right not to agree, not to listen and not to finance one’s own antagonists.

The Virtue of Selfishness “Man’s Rights” - Ayn Rand

I'm trying to think of a more descriptive word that describes these types of events.

It is his sons who are doing everything to destroy it.

It is only a matter of time .

Many subscribers cancelled.

It is no fun to read the likes of Rebecca Ballhaus et al, regularly concocting hit pieces on the president.