- Hot
- New
- Categories...
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
- Marketplace
- Members
- Store
- More...
I help research voter fraud. We have submitted thousands of duplicate registrants between NY and FL and other states. Actual lists of people who appear to have voted in multiple states (FL vs (NY, OH, MI, etc))... Matching based on First, Last, Middle initial and DOB...
We give the SOEs the lists of duplicate registrants, so that they can clean them up before voting happens. THEY REFUSE to do it! Then the extra votes come in.
And the LACK of voter ID is so they (Democrats) can get the SAME DATA we use. They call the duplicate regtistrants in many cases, and PRETEND they are polling, and ask: "Do you plant to vote in NY this election?" If they say No... Then someone shows up and votes for them.
To NOT require a voter ID with a photo, is INSANE. We should also collect a Biometric. So that anyone who votes multiple times, we have their biometrics on file. Fingerprint/thumbprint.
And if we find the same fingerprint voting in multiple states, we can eventually find them!
Plus logging the exact time, down to the second, as to when they came through the line to vote.
Because MOST dead people who vote IN person, are actually MISTAKES whereby ballot stuffers say "sign 30 people in", and they pick 30 random people. Sometimes, they pick a dead person.
So, you can estimate the ballot stuffing by the Percentage of dead people who vote in person.
The exact timestamp and terminal number would allow data people, like myself to know what terminal can possible sign in 30 people in 30 seconds, when NORMALLY it takes 30 minutes...
Also, it would be nice to know how many were done in NON-PEAK Time (3 terminals, yet ONE handled all of these), or they all quickly came in 1 minute after the polls were closed.
Also, they usually scan the ballots in BEFORE registering them in... And that (vote tally vs time) would be catchable!
But mark my words. NOTHING WILL CHANGE!
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/acting...
[Only when the election harms the D party will they claim foreign interference]
Keyword: 'Foreign'
What about Domestic interference?
>Non-Cit votes by county
>Non-Cit promo by county
>Non-Cit org by county
>Targeted districts breakdown by 'Non-Cit' data acc
>Voter irregularities [internal]
>(-2) Laws enacted in battleground areas as test for 2020 (voter roll screening/review of non_votes (D) > ballot pop > track for sign > submit late for count) - vote swing figures + rule of law (new standard of no show vote SC 2019 scope case?)
Why do D's push for NO VOTER ID in U.S. elections?
Why do D's push for OPEN BORDERS?
Find the connection.
Sometimes a MAP helps.
What SC decision (6-3) ruled VOTER ID did NOT suppress votes or deter minorities?
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-us...
What (FALSE) 'narrative' is pushed by D's re: VOTER ID LAW?
Racist?
Voter suppression of minority vote?
When is an ID required?
Should an ID not be required at all (for any reason) given the argument made by D's?
Does the argument 'A NATIONAL VOTER ID LAW would suppress the minority vote' suggest minorities are incapable of obtaining an ID?
When is an ID required?
Which minorities are they referring to?
(illegal immigrants?)
Logical thinking.
If there is a previous SC decision on the matter (pre-POTUS Justice conf), would a NATIONAL VOTER ID LAW MANDATE using the SC ruling of 2008 (+ common sense logic/arguments) as the LEGAL FOUNDATION, have merit?
Is every other country that has a VOTER ID LAW considered racist?
https://www.newsobserver.com/news/pol...
Will the DOJ support the push instead of file legal challenges as [LL] did in the past?
If the SC ruled in 2008 that VOTER ID laws do not impact/harm or prevent 'minorities' from voting, how could the U.S. 4th Circuit Court rule opposite?
Is the 4th Circuit Court considered LEFT/Liberal?
https://www.newsobserver.com/news/pol...
Why do D's want POWER at all costs?
One example above.
Logical thinking.
#FactsMatter
You are the news now.
Q
https://youtu.be/fyp2MSUcaTM
Here is a world’s record holder,
https://youtu.be/zrJYhxtGkRg
(Which was broken, by them)
I was in the Czech Republic, enjoying the heck out of a short tour through Prague. Unbeknownst to me, some local people were ALSO enjoying my tour while they spent my traveler's cheques, using MY PASSPORT as identification, which they somehow managed to lift out of my purse. In those days, there were still border checks between Czech and Germany. I spent a very few tense moments as we went through the border while the local soldiers checked passports. I spent these tense moments in the bathroom of the bus, hiding. I made it, but not without major stress.
Although I made it through the border okay, I was scheduled to fly back to the US that same day and there was no getting on the plane without a passport. So off to the US consulate in Frankfurt, and there was only one document in my entire wallet that helped me prove citizenship. It wasn't my driver license, wasn't my social security card. It was my voter ID card. With that alone (and cash to pay the fees), they were willing to process a temporary passport, and I made it home okay.
I wonder if that were to happen to me now, what the response would be?
Currently, if I know that my neighbor is not going to vote, I could show up and say his name and address and I could vote for him. There is a high probability that the election judge will not know me so I have no fear of getting caught. If I had to show a government ID (drivers license) this would stop.
We are required to show identification each time you talk to a government official,, bank, or credit union, but not to vote, this is crazy.