It occurs to me that she is too small a fish who has no knowledge of the real guilty parties, and that she is a planned fall-girl for the guilty parties.
Just make certain that she is not prosecuted for political information, but for genuine secrets, and then make a point to punish her using wording that clearly establishes that Hitlery will be prosecuted for even worse releases of classified data. Then after a military trial execute Hitlery and jail her guilty accomplices in Gitmo.
How could we possibly accuse Natalie Mayflower Sours Edwards of a crime? She is completely innocent, or she has been framed, or she had full permission to do what she allegedly did, or she is oppressed, or she is a native American, or it was a socially just cause, or she is a protected species, as I’m sure the mainstream media will soon tell us, sometime after they update their collective game plan.
In a world of subjective morality, she is totally innocent, everyone is innocent, unless you're a survivor, then anyone you name is guilty. Who are we to judge?
In “To Kill a Mockingbird” the man acussed of rape by the woman was guilty because the court “believed survivors”, not the evidence. A great example of applying, “social justice.” That’s the direction those against reason are heading us.
Then after a military trial execute Hitlery and jail her guilty accomplices in Gitmo.
I bet she will get her full pension like Lerner.
Hatred is oozing from her eyes.
hatred?? Guess I am missing something here but going with hatred...