SerialBrain - the Brennan Problem. Can you solve the 561 triangle -Bachmann, Scalia and JetBlue? - Galt's Gulch

Remove this ad.

2

SerialBrain - the Brennan Problem. Can you solve the 561 triangle -Bachmann, Scalia and JetBlue?

Posted by nickursis 6 years, 6 months ago to Government

10 comments | Share | Flag

A very interesting analysis of the Brennan/Bachmann/Scalia connection, and indicates Scalia was indeed murdered (which should not be a surprise to anyone). Consider this as proof from her Wiki: "With her retirement from Congress, the ethics investigations against her were dropped."

SOURCE URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LE6iJ_9RJo0

Add Comment

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

1

Posted by freedomforall 6 years, 6 months ago

Total waste of time. What a crock of rubbish.
Rubbish.
Since I have an open mind about what the media often calls "conspiracy theory" when there is real evidence, I am inclined to conclude that at worst this is a purposeful attempt to mislead Trump's supporters in order to shatter their belief that any conspiracy exists at all. At best, this is a pathetic attempt to gain desperate followers on youtube.
Certainly Brennan is suspect of a multitude of violations of peoples rights, but this sort of pathetic irrelevant non-evidence is disgusting to anyone interested in finding facts to prove Brennan's guilt and it just gives Brennan's supporters ammunition to use in his defense.

Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink
- 2
  
  Posted by coaldigger 6 years, 6 months ago
  
  I do not see this video as being credible but I have always been concerned with anyone that has covert power. If power corrupts, how much more dangerous is power exercised in secret? Spying is dirt by definition and in my opinion can only be justified when at a state of war with a mortal enemy. War does not have to be an "all out war" but a declaration that we have a legal case against another country that we can provide reasonable proof wants to do us harm. Spying on allies, our own citizens and non-declared enemies is unreasonable. If we want to send drones to kill someone and also risk killing others as collateral damage, I believe we need a publicly declared, even if limited, war.
  
  Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
  - 2
    
    Posted by freedomforall 6 years, 6 months ago
    
    Completely agree and I share the same concerns. I hate seeing such poorly crafted videos because I think they do more harm than good; they give the enemies of freedom an excuse to say that anyone who criticizes the state is a loonie conspiracy nut. That argument has been a very effective weapon that has allowed the enemy to maintain and increase their power.
    
    Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
  - 1
    
    Posted by nickursis 6 years, 6 months ago
    
    I guess it was just an "amazing coincidence" that after she showed Brennan to have lied to Congress and the people, about droone strikes, and that the Obama gang was doing whatever they wanted with them, she mysteriously develops creepy chiefs of staff, and anonymous accusations surface, and start playing in MSM. Call me suspicious, but looks a lot like the same program they are using on Trump, but she had no Q to protect her.
    
    Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
- 1
  
  Posted by nickursis 6 years, 6 months ago
  
  Freedom, it isn't SB2 making the claim, he is simply providing the details to some Q posts about the connections of Brennan, Bachmann and the Jet Blue incident. Pretty damn convincing in my book, but we all have out opinions.
  
  Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
  - 2
    
    Posted by freedomforall 6 years, 6 months ago
    
    Nick, the so-called evidence presented here makes the presenter (and by association Q) appear to be irrational and grasping at anything. What is his actual intention? Can anything stated be considered evidence when accompanied by irrational rubbish in the same presentation?
    I couldn't bear to even watch beyond the first 15 minutes (which were an intolerable waste of time imo) because it was such trash and when he tried to connect events with magic numbers I said, no more, this is crap. Appearances matter. If one wants to be believed when stating facts to be used as evidence then he'd better state them objectively without mumbo jumbo rubbish to connect the dots, or they will be perceived for what they are- unconnected irrelevant dots. If you make statements that are completely unbelievable and give no rational supporting evidence then your audience will conclude you are a loon and that audience leaves the theater, as I did with this un-objective video.
    
    Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
    - 1
      
      Posted by nickursis 6 years, 6 months ago
      
      I do not intend offense, so please excuse me if I did.
      
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
      - 2
        
        Posted by freedomforall 6 years, 6 months ago
        
        I didn't take it that way, nick, and I sincerely hope that I didn't offend either. imo, we are both searching for the truth and it's hard to find.
        
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
        
        1
        
        Posted by nickursis 6 years, 6 months ago
        
        It is incredibly hard, because they have needed it to be, they are in shadows and work with lies, obfuscation and deceit. That makes it very hard to be strictly objectivist, and factual, because we dont have them. It is also complicated by the need for misdirection and riddles to keep the opposition from knowing more than they can allow them to have. We tend to see the political, but it is also moral, scientific, and social re-engineering that is at work, you see it in the way they are bending science (BBC news " Chemtrails are legitimate cloud types") and social structure (Person running for congress as a declared "pedophile"). I fear if the current attempts to stop them fail, they will come back stronger and fix their mistakes, and we will never be able to throw them out.
        
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
    - 1
      
      Posted by nickursis 6 years, 6 months ago
      
      As you wish, sir. One of the points being made is the bad guys are communicating using their own codes and methods, numbers being one possibility, and I see the point that is being made here. Is it fact? Nope, Does it make sense on a rational basis? IMHO, yes, the number aspect does seem to match the events. I see it as a validation tool for some of the statements Q has made. Q can be very cryptic, for good reason, they are protecting a lot of sources and assets, and people.
      
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink

Comment hidden.