"NO MSM investigations? Biggest threat to the American people!"
This is interesting, because of the supposed "missle launch" from Whidbey Island, June 2018. Now, it looks like a missile launch (it is a 20 second exposure, meaning motion would skew in it) but the real stake through the heart is the story concocted by the guy running it, a day later that "'They were transiting from Bremerton to Bellingham on a standard instrument flight plan, flying in the clouds with night vision goggles. The search light was retracted flush under the nose, but did not switch off and was facing straight down.'". Uh, Bremerton is on the left of the camera, due west, and Bellingham is to the right (North east) , so this "searchlight" would have skewed laef to right, not up and down. Someone got to the guy, and told him to put out this really stupid story, to kill it. Was a missle launched? Don't know. Picture looks like one, and there are NO missiles on the Island I have ever heard from, as I lived there for 15 years. But if Q says it was something, I am pretty sure there is.
SOURCE URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4Wc6Zs3qQM
On the content:
(1) One issue is that the "missile" launch shown was in June in Washington state and the supposed threat was in Hawaii in January. Never explained. No rational thought to connect them.
(2) On Facebook and China it's all supposition without factual foundation. It could as likely have been that Facebook was being run by CIA to get data on Chinese users of Facebook and China killed it to prevent that.
This is supposed to be an objectivist site where people use rational thought to analyze facts. This video and others are not objective and don't belong here except, perhaps, as examples of irrational speculation.
I'm not saying that there is no truth in the presentation, but that it is not a rational presentation nor does it qualify as evidence of any crime. Stick to the facts and present them rationally or you have little credibility.
If you want to bring a few gems of information to the Gulch, please have some respect for the Gulch. The lunatic ravings of the majority of these video presentations are not objective. If you think there are valid points may I suggest that you use the comment area of your topic to highlight them and the time within the video to find them.
From the Inspector General's report in 2016:
"Intelligence agencies claim that Clinton’s account contained 65 messages with information considered “Secret” and 22 classified at the “Top Secret” level. Some messages contained data under an even more restrictive “special access program” designation."
That establishes she is guilty of lying in a federal investigation and that she is guilty of deliberate unsecured transmission of improperly marked classified national security intelligence.
Hitlery is not in jail because her corrupt FBI flunky's did not properly prosecute her when they had ample evidence to do so because they thought she would be POTUS in 2017.
So far there has been no evidence released that Hitlery is complicit in murder.
Barrack never provided a valid birth certificate. N-E-V-E-R. The feds did not pursue it for obvious reasons of scandal. I hope that one of the Dems will turn states evidence against him to save themselves and every single thing Obama did gets invalidated as he was never qualified to take the office. But this is speculation without supporting facts except for Obama's inability to prove his place of birth and fraudulent attempts by (likely corrupt) agencies to do so.
Serial brain makes me waste 45 minutes to an hour on every one of his idiotic videos when he could have prepared them with only the data in text and made the point in 5 minutes. He also includes a lot of rubbish that has no basis in fact that makes him look like a damn fool. He makes conclusions based upon unrelated news articles without anything but irrational speculation. My examples are based upon the Inspector General's report and the clear inaction of the FBI when in other cases with no intent or loss of data the FBI has prosecuted and jailed people for years. There is no comparison between the speculative rubbish in Serial Brain's video and the facts I have mentioned.
Serial Brain is not investigating anything. He is not getting any facts to back up his conclusions. He doing nothing but speculating with his own bias and without evidence. Very much like the MSM.
I understand what you are doing, nick. I just don't understand the faith you appear to have in the source or the messenger.