California's new water restrictions send residents fleeing to saner states
Now things begin sto stir as people actually need to be told a few dozen times what their lunatic control freak government is up to. This was last week and they are just starting to get excited....
Sorry, partial rant! California, as a state, landscape. I LOVE. But the poltics and the people have become absolutely insane since I left CA in the 1990s!
Now that I've retired to Oklahoma, I marvel at the difference. The Okies learned from the dust bowl days, and have built a very efficient water management system of numerous reservoirs and canals to balance the levels between them. Even after five years of extreme drought the state remained productive, with few water use restrictions. In ten years, the only thing I've had to do is to restrict watering my lawn to every other day.
/rimshot
https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/3096f7cc...
I live in rural Nevada. We need a border wall on our western state line.
If water projects were private, none of this would have happened. California's population would never have outgrown the land's ability to support it. But lack of imagination has meant that water was a public utility since ancient Rome with its famous aqueducts, and possibly more ancient than that.
I've looked at Rand's essays. I didn't find the one on the property status of water--unless I missed something.
I can proudly say that, for the first time in my life, I now get my water from a completely private source. I have an Artesian well in my front yard. Not only is this the best water apart from a mountain spring or stream, but it depends solely on local rainfall, which has always been plentiful. I manage the water, and I control its quality. Nobody tells me how much or how little water I must use, because I do not draw from a common source. (And I even added a second source: a rain barrel.)
Nobody thinks in terms of light (that is, electricity), gas or water subject to private delivery and management. We all know that was the rule in Atlantis. (Dick McNamara became the prime LGW distribution provider; John Galt was, of course, the prime electrical generation provider.)
California is only the first polity to pay the price, in the form of a tragedy of the commons, for providing government water with no thought for the future. The Republic of Israel at least have done some planning, but are now about to embark on desalination to supplement their water. Water will be a casus belli soon.
But I am preaching to the choir;^)
Underground pipe leaks and running toilets are quiet water wasters, not to mention underground and above ground sprinkler faults.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/cal...
Snopes says no, the fines applies to the water suppliers, although how that works I don't know.
Moonbeams announcement clearly says: Establishing an indoor, per person water use goal of 55 gallons per day until 2025, 52.5 gallons from 2025 to 2030 and 50 gallons beginning in 2030.
I had a hard time finding anyone who could clearly show that the law would or would not penalize individuals, I know a couple years ago they did require each well to have a meter on it, as I had personal experience with people who could not believe they imposed such invasion of property.
All the while California permits illegal immigration of refugees and other people of limited education, making their need for water go up.
Eventually there will be an exodus of residents along with the individual fines for “excessive” water use, and some restrictions regarding fleeing the state. I left some time ago while it was still a decent place to live
Here in Vegas, one of the former bastions of independence (I would have thought..), one cannot start a business UNTIL its approved by the city itself. And that approval can only come after 45 days of deliberation and a visit to the city council meeting and getting approval from the sheriff department. In addition the business you are proposing to start needs to be on a list of "approved businesses.
On the water issue here, the water utility is a little smarter, having tiers of water usage per month with rates that quarduple as you get to the highest tier. But its still VERY cheap, and probably lower than the real market value.
The idea of the free market for water is not new of course. One of the most influential proponents was economist Steve Hanke whose work I met > 30 years ago.
The figures given for water consumption are to me a bit on the high side. That would be an outcome of government controls and subsidies holding prices down.
A proper market would get the companies to watch waste more carefully, that 30% loss due to leaks is too high.
Even in the current system there is still a role for the market in that over time domestic appliances will be designed to be more frugal in the use of water.
Biut socialists must believe their government is the savior, even when the evidence is overwhlming that it fails 100% of the time.
We, the People, should do the same to the feds and their dependent corporate looters.