Dutch intelligence had a front-row seat to Russian DNC hack
This is interesting, but raises a whole series of questions. Engadget only talks about "anoymous sources" which means 0, in terms of credibility. Go to the "de Volksrant" (people rant?) website and they give a much deeper article. However, it still, while sounding good, says either the Obama gangs NSA, FBI and State Department IT "experts" are incredibly incompetent, or there is a whole lot of BS being thrown around. Not being a hacker myself, I do not see why they had this supposed "big battle" and then these evil Russians penetrated both the White House and the DNC. You mean nobody told all the probable targets "Red Alert" and "DO NOT open any emails that are the least bit weird" It just seems that either there is huge incompetency, or this is not the real story.....
More important is the corruption of these statists being exposed.
Release the memo.
Isn't that a good thing for individual liberty?
I don't want such unethical statist looting scumbags elected or appointed to any office or position of public trust.
Love your colorful description.
I still don't think the DNC was hacked, it's more likely the info was stolen and passed on...that was a much more credible story. The "Hack" story only promotes the DNC coverup.
Assange offered $100,000 reward .
Wikileaks says it was not from Russians.
The narrative does покрывать убийство.
The FBI never got to look at the computers involved. And according to logs, like 8GB of data was transferred in seconds. Implying a USB3 type device and NOT an internet connection.
This account, is more like the stuff we KNOW was going on. Hackers hack. Other people create fake news web sites, etc. Most hackers don't have the patience for that. They would rather unlock the door, get paid, and move on.
So I agree. Someone is rewriting history. I trust WikiLeaks on their sourcing.
Also, it makes me curious as to what tools they used to see all of this, because my understanding is that MOST of these hackers VPN into other boxes to hide their foot prints, so the data they were pulling over the network was most probably encrypted during transmission. Not doing so is a childish mistake.