Shrugging Galt's Gulch (online)
Posted by flanap 11 years, 11 months ago to Philosophy
Unfortunately, I will be needing to "shrug" this forum. I have asked too many questions without satisfactory answers from those who are Objectivists, or at least those who adhere to Ms. Rand's teachings/philosophy.
I won't list those questions which I do not believe have been answered because I won't be here anyways, so why waste the 0's and 1's.
I have enjoyed the banter and hope that those who have not seen the light which is in Christ Jesus, our Lord, will do so before God calls you away from this earth.
Take care,
flanap
I won't list those questions which I do not believe have been answered because I won't be here anyways, so why waste the 0's and 1's.
I have enjoyed the banter and hope that those who have not seen the light which is in Christ Jesus, our Lord, will do so before God calls you away from this earth.
Take care,
flanap
Of course, there are a "few" evangelists out there who get more than their "fair share," as it were...
what song?
"Good Girls Don't"...by The Knack
I say Queen "We will Rock You"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-tJYN-eG1...
This one isn't cleaned up :)
No...the Knack!!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sc4l5EpC......
Man...they cleaned up some of the lyrics....that's just WRONG!
I, too, am not inclined to yank their chain as long as they don't get pushy. Because back when I was a Christian, I was the worst... meaning pushy... so I don't feel that I have any room to criticize.
But when they cross over onto my turf... it's GAME ON!
Your rhetorical tricks are rudimentary. It is not a waste of digital space to ask questions because it's NEVER a waste to ask questions and it's not possible to waste digital space. You also haven't received satisfactory answers to your questions because NO answer will be satisfactory to you.
Finally, since you've decided to be condescending, I will as well. I hope you stop believing in fairytales sooner rather than later so you can realize it's actually more comforting to accept responsibility for your 80 years here than to abdicate it to some higher power that predicates your redemption on obedience and selfsacrifice.
Ok, to be a bit more calm...Why don't you take a break, leave to the Outside for awhile & THEN decide?
Framing this as "anyone who disagrees with you doesn't have a legitimate concern" is a Straw Man of the highest order.
And yes, such idiots deserve mockery.
And in case you didn't notice the "whoosh" sound, US was being sarcastic.
Somethings can't be explained. Some people can't be convinced by other people. But that doesn't sway my faith in my Savior. Besides, I've had things happen to both myself and friends of mine that no scientist, or non-spiritual person can ever explain. I won't go into them here.
You're FREE to choose, in this country and in this era. Most of the time throughout history, this wasn't the case in both Christianity (pre-Reformation) and in Islam. But in Islam, it means actual death both 1400 years ago and today. (So much for tolerance) But here, no penalties, no problem. Oh, I don't condemn anyone for not believing.
I can see where you think my perception of one day all who don't believe in JC will have to make a choice as mocking, since it is sort of a challenge to your belief. So yes, it is a challenge, but I am not picking on or making fun of those who don't believe. I would at least think you would rejoice in that nobody is threatening you to believe. And that's where Christianity and American ideals shine: people in other countries are not so blessed.
Now what is the challenge? For me, it's to prove that JC is real and that you will at some point, have to make a choice. By the way, not making a choice, is still a choice. (check the lyrics for Rush, Freewill, you are a Rush fan right? 10 Points for you if you are) Anyways, for you, it's proving to me that JC doesn't exist. Right?
But since I believe in Christianity and you don't, and I am not an atheist, and you are, I don't see how either of us could ever come to some conclusion in which both of us are satisfied with each others' examples, points, etc. If you believe we can, go for it. I'm open to your ideas.
I have an uncle that tries, unsuccessfully, to get me to read the bible and profess that I am a sinner, but will be redeemed if I accept JC into my life. This is the brother of my aunt who shrugged. Weird, eh? But the facts of dinosaurs, and evolution are concrete. I don't have issues with folks who believe, just don't expect me to feel as you do, and don't spout rhetoric that I really don't wish to hear. I won't force my opinions on them, either. Usually they fall on deaf ears, anyway...
Just sayin'
1. People evade too much to be objectivists.
2. We're mean to people who are sympathetic, so it's no wonder people aren't convinced.
...then he turns mean.
Sorry. Wish I could be nicer.