- Hot
- New
- Categories...
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
- Marketplace
- Members
- Store
- More...
Just to show you how deeply (pun?) I was affected I bought 2 more copies of the book so I could tape Roark's speech on my bedroom and on those days when I was feeling down, I could read it at a glance and feel better. That was 69 years ago.!
1965-1966 - University student; Trips to NBI in NYC for lecture series
1966-1967 - Moved to NYC, Part time work for NBI (The Objectivist Newsletter, The Objectivist, NBI publishing)
1968-1970 Vietnam
1970 Back in NYC, a bit different association, then...
College, careers, retirement.
Best friend in 1964 who introduced me to Ayn Rand books is still my best friend today. So it’s been 53 years as a student of Objectivism. I no longer produce anything, except thoughts of what might and should be.
Read many books as I got older, some were useful others were not. Talked with people in the John Birch Society. Someone mentioned Ayn Rand's books and someone told me that she believed in witchcraft and that was what her books were about. Wasn't interested until a friend read one of them to find out what they were really about. After her recommendation I read 'The Fountainhead', was hooked and sped through everything else I could find. Ayn succinctly and eloquently defined what I had always believed to be true. I find it interesting when detractors try to undermine her logic by saying things like; "I read The Fountainhead and disagree with someone who thinks only architects should be free! ?? Besides Ayn's novels I have truly enjoyed her definitive works also. Still working on understanding how to live objectively in an unfree world.
I'm not an Objectivist, in the purest sense of the word, but I agree with a great number of Rand's principles.
When speaking at Ford Hall Forum Ayn Rand would similarly refuse to re-answer a question she had already addressed, telling the questioner that the answer was extensively covered in AS. Initially I thought that attitude was rather callous of her. Eventually I realized that the questioners were often repeating a question in a demanding and hostile manner, just to get a hostile response from her, and she was refusing to take the bait.
Another person who I was seeing at the time and who probably was about as far from being an "ideal" objectivist as one can get, gave me a copy of The Fountainhead. That was 50 - OOps, 51 - years ago, and my life was never the same. I responded to the concepts with my entire being. Although a lot of things have changed since then, it took 20-30 years of "percolating" and re-reading all of AR's works to assimilate and incorporate them into my life, even while realizing that no one is perfect or 100% correct. It actually even cost me a marriage, but it was a bad marriage to start with anyway.
I gave up for a time on philosophy and involved myself in engineering -- a safe bet. I mean, even Russian Communism had engineers, right!? When I did read anything, I didn't find any answer in Camus, Nietzsche, or even Popper.
Then a liberal person told me that Atlas Shrugged "made [her] an asshole for a couple of weeks". I found this person's politics absolutely confused and distorted, so why not try reading something that clearly negated all that? So I read the book.
Since then, I have read many of Ayn Rand's non-fiction works and Leonard Peikoff's Objectivism: The Philosophy of Ayn Rand as well.
It's annoying if I have to do it for a cause, and for some people it becomes a habit like for Peter Keating. They're not doing it so they can make money and go live their dream. It becomes all the life/dream they have. It's probably far from the most profound thing Rand wrote about, but it meant a lot for me to learn maybe people who do that have no end goal. Maybe this is their thing, this is what gives them that feeling of getting something working... they just want other people to react to them.
For some reason it stands out when Peter Keating was disappointed the housekeeper saw him walking down the stairs and didn't react. He wanted him to genuflect to the boss or show contempt for the boss, anything besides just going about his job and minding his own business.
I am still reading Atlas Shrugged, but it is really resonating with the way I think. Never thought that there was a book that could make me interested in any philosophy
It was Marks work on what he calls Neothink and its application, which actually resembles a higher level of awareness, consciousness and world views. We see that in Spiral Dynamics where about .1% of the population has achieved new levels of integration's beyond the formalized memes of awareness.
Neothink embraces Objectivity as Rand presents it and goes beyond that.
It was really eye opening stuff. I was also introduced to Julian Jaynes: The breakdown of the Bicameral Mind. (read Brain). The work of Jaynes forms the basis of my work in: The Fight for Conscious Human Life© found at most book downloading sites.
Before that me old dino had never heard of Ayn Rand or objectivism, a word my spell checker still red lines.
Before I saw all three DVDs I became interested enough in Ayn Rand's philosophy that I stumbled into The Gulch for looking around on the internet.
I've been learning a lot here. I'm still a dictionary definition ooga-booga mystic, though. That's not going away.
I grabbed the first one I found at the library, Fountainhead. I was sure I would hate it. It turned out I loved it. It made me rethink some political behavior I have seen in my life.