Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by LetsShrug 10 years, 4 months ago
    It's a love story, essentially?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by sdesapio 10 years, 4 months ago
      Believe it or not, Laura did her research and... she got that answer from Ayn Rand herself...

      "... when asked by film producer Albert S. Ruddy if a screenplay could focus on the love story, Rand agreed and said, 'That's all it ever was.'" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlas_Shru...)

      You have to remember that, for most of the actors, Atlas Shrugged was NEW and they had to hurry up and "get it" as quickly as they could. And, the depth of Atlas is not something you "get" in a week. As any person does while learning, Laura associated with what resonated with her. Rand's response to Ruddy struck a chord and she latched on to it.

      Now, we can pontificate on exactly what Rand meant - it's a love story of self, it's a love story of life, it's a love story between a man and a woman, etc. - but in the end, yes... Atlas Shrugged is a love story, ESSENTIALLY. :)
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
    • -1
      Posted by Hiraghm 10 years, 4 months ago
      So, because the actor playing John Galt is "hawt", it's a love story, see.

      Otherwise, (say, if Danny Devito was playing John Galt) it would be the story of a woman trying to save her railroad from the stalker determined to destroy it (and the world) in order to make her turn to him.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Mimi 10 years, 4 months ago
    She will make a lovely Dagny. Can’t wait!
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ MikeMarotta 10 years, 4 months ago
      I am sure that she will be fine. We can only assume that she was hired for her skills. It is just that very few actors - or anyone - sounds smart talking ad lib. You can find Christopher Hitchens debating William F. Buckley, Jr., on "Firing Line." They were not actors chatting ad lib. They were writers, speaking their own words.

      Tangentially, I think that it is improper for us to judge a presidential candidate by how well they fire off zingers and one-liners and quips and all the other sound bites. I read somewhere that within the campaign - which now runs about a year - the candidates will speak one million words. The person who looks best on camera wins. We do not elect writers, at least not since the first generation after the Revolution.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 10 years, 4 months ago
    Another airhead or just acting the role of airhead for the tv proles?
    TV is such rubbish.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ MikeMarotta 10 years, 4 months ago
      Actors by their nature and training read the lines that others write for them. See Alec Baldwin in TEAM AMERICA: "let's all read newspapers and then go on television and repeat what we read as if it were our own ideas." Funny when it is a liberal; not so funny when it is Dagny Taggart. The movie is not the actors. We all lush and gush for the actors and actresses, but they all just read the lines they are given by the writers. It is the writers first and then the realization by the director that makes a movie. Actors are just a more complicated kind of scenary.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo