George Carlin on Global Warming
This is classic George Carlin, and he let's the global warming crowd have it on that topic.
PLEASE BE WARNED - George Carlin has uses his colorful vocabulary in this video.
PLEASE BE WARNED - George Carlin has uses his colorful vocabulary in this video.
SOURCE URL: https://youtu.be/BB0aFPXr4n4
or
Fatal Courtroom Act Ruins Michael 'hockey stick' Mann | Prominent climate alarmist Michael Mann shockingly defies judge and refuses to surrender climate data for open court examination, committing contempt of court.
http://principia-scientific.org/break...
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2...
Dean DID say the First Amendment does not protect whatever "hate speech" is to him.
That does kinda leave an awaiting cell door open, though.
The logical next step for the Dems is to send anyone who disagrees with them to jail or to a concentration camp. But first they would have to disarm us, which is what they are trying to do.
For that, I'm still buying ammo (as you once suggested) one box of bullets a month.
So far it has been only 9mm rounds. A gun dealer agreed with my (still a) theory that if Big Brother stated to confiscate bullets, 9mm pistol rounds would be the last to disappear due to there being so many.
I had parts for an AR15 rifle modified into a carbine loaded with 9mm pistol rounds.
What do you mean watch the language? Sounds like me at the office!
People trying to make the world save for their Volvo's. Besides, environmentalists don't care about the planet, not in the abstract they don't. You know what they're interested in? A clean place to live. They're worried that someday in the future they might be inconvenienced. There's nothing wrong with the planet. The people are f#(%ed. The planet isn't going away. We are. Just another evolutionary dead-end.
It will heal itself. It will cleanse itself. The air and water will recover.
It's so true. I don't care about the planet, even if it doesn't cleanse itself and the post-Holocene world is fundamentally different from pre-Holocene. All that matters is people and their property.
https://youtu.be/ozO4YB98mCY
Even hunter-gatherer tribes understood the concept of limiting hunting because of the effect it has on next year's hunting. When the industrial revolution happened and population exploded, we started having a greater impact. It appears our activities now may have a great cost on others in the form of global warming. If we had to pay for them, the supply curve would shift and we'd more quickly commercialize sustainable energy alternatives. This will happen eventually anyway. It's a question of how much net environmental cost (there will be some costs and some benefits; a net cost) it incurs and if we could really move the needle if we had to pay those costs as the time we use the energy. (Move the needle = come out ahead when you do the amortization of the cost adopting alternative energies sooner with the supposed future savings from reducing climate change.)
In any case, our effect on the planet doesn't matter. What matters is people and their property.
I am tired of your ignoring the fraud being imposed on US citizens.
”The only hope for the world is to make sure there is not another United States. We can’t let other countries have the same number of cars, the amount of industrialization we have in the US. We have to stop these third World countries right where they are.”
Michael Oppenheimer
Environmental Defense Fund
http://principia-scientific.org/break...
What matters is unaltered evidence but you f..ing idiots want to jail people who are skeptical.
Stalin was right Useful idiots help destroy freedom and prosperity.
Your climate models are worthless!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MS0qL...
The desire to Jail skeptics is not new Galeleo Galilini the father of modern Astronemy. He was tried by the Inquisition, found "vehemently suspect of heresy", and forced to recant. He spent the rest of his life under house arrest.
The beneficiaries of this fake science are running
a full press against reality .What a world. The kakistocrats and the paid minions are shameful.
I have no doubt. I'm unclear on the costs of adopting carbon-neutral alternatives and the future costs of increased flooding, storms, etc that you mention. But there's no doubt in my mind smart people can and will do some of both, in ways that will seem amazing and make one of the biggest problems just a few lines in a history book.
Any evidence for that mass extinction other than from the mouths of the left?
The left? That's politics. I'm talking about reality.
Since it supposedly has been very large, you should be able to come up with at least a few paragraphs of confirmed evidence for it.
But by now you can get an idea for the major outlines of an environmental hysteria. The steps are: a) start with assumption that man is “ravaging the Earth,” b) latch onto an unproven scientific hypothesis that fits this preconception, c) extrapolate wildly from half-formed theories and short-term trends to predict a future apocalypse, d) pressure a bunch of people with “Ph.D.” after their names to endorse it so you can say it’s a consensus of experts, e) get the press to broadcast it with even less nuance and get a bunch of Hollywood celebrities who failed Freshman biology to adopt it as their pet cause, then finally f) quietly drop the whole thing when it doesn’t pan out—and move on with undiminished enthusiasm to the next environmental doomsday scenario. Now it is climate change.
Unheard of snow in the Sahara desert.
Glaciation in California this summer as little of the 200 inches of record snow last winter melted.
Skiing in California resorts all summer
Global warming rally in Colorado this spring canceled due to a blizzard
4 freak summer snow events in Australia.
One day this summer above 67 degrees in Netherlands no crops grew there.
the coldest summer temp reading in the northern hemisphere at -37 ever. On and on ....you live in Wisconsin it was the coldest August you have expirienced in your life.
This is just the start. The reason is the sun and not man. Co 2 is not a pollutant carbon monoxide is.
Co2 at current levels is .003% of the atmosphere and is plant food. In the way distant past it is known that co2 levels have been higher by 100x.
This solar cycle is 360 year cycle and like clock work it has commenced it is about 36 years of
Crop failure and dynasty changes.
CG you never present any evidence of your global warming position and I feel like a record that is playing the same same song and you don't hear it.
I could imagine all that happening. I can never imagine ESP or homeopathy being real though.
I really think of climate change denial along the lines of demonizing GMOs or vaccines--- and unlike homeopathy, I could imagine by some new evidence upending our understanding of global warming, GMOs, or vaccines. I give them all roughly equal chances. None of this matters, though, to people who start with their chosen answer without regard to the science. People playing politics have to try to work reality to meet their desires, but for scientific people new discoveries are exciting.
Those topics (GMOs, global warming, and other things people like to make stuff up about) are outside my area. Even if it were inside my area, this is like someone asking me to prove frequency-selective fading is really problem for wide-band OFDM transceivers and it's not just an excuse to promote MIMO. Now I'm almost afraid this notion will stick in the mind of someone who sees the world as all politics.
I accept the science as it is. If scientists of the world are conspiring about global warming, I would be fooled. If big pharma were hiding a cure for cancer, I wouldn't be able to sleuth it out. I probably would be able to figure out if homeopathy or chemtrails were real. I guess if the pro-MIMO conspiracy were true, not all that many people would be able to read the science and figure it out. Although I think I'm going have a nightmare about it: "I've been reading IEEE Transactions on Communications, and this sure sounds fishy to me!!"