Isn't Warren Buffett the new Jim Taggart? I know he is benefiting from his buddy the prez not approving the Keystone pipeline so the oil has to go by rail.
It's time for Ellis Wyatt to demand the upgrading of his rail capacity and for Dagny Taggart to build The John Galt Line. Seriously, this news item does read like it came out of the first few hundred pages of AS.
So wait a minute. If one of the primary reasons for shortage is the transportation of oil, wouldn't the Keystone pipeline help to alleviate this and allow the rail lines to get back to hauling these other commodities?
Yes, and that is precisely why the Big O prevents it. He made it quite clear that he wants to remake the nation; less clear, he wants to do that, in part, by eviscerating the US of power and resources, thus of dominance.
He successfully and effectively moves us inexorably closer to the goal of dependence of both the nation and us, its citizens. Yes, the prescient Ayn Rand indeed might have seen this in our future!
Look further down in this thread, and you will see that an unusually dry August is predicted, resulting in the highest soybean prices in nine weeks today.
Do you remember the horrendous cost of propane last winter? That was because there was no rail capacity to deliver it in tank cars and it was being trucked from Texas to the northern plains states. While driving through the corn belt two weeks ago I heard a radio farm report about MN farmers losing hundreds of $millions because there was no rail capacity to ship their crops to market. I boat on the upper Mississippi River and the rails on both sides of the river are choked with oil trains and with frac sand trains. The sand needs to move by rail but the oil is far better moved by pipeline. Why are no new rail routes being added? Because no matter which way the route is planned there are small governments and small people who use lawyers and judges and endangered species and environmental regulations and eye pollution and mob rule to block any form of national improvement.
Its interesting how a lot of people that have heard or read a little about AS tend to dismiss it because of the technology base.
They dismiss it because Taggart Transcontinental is such a central focus of the story.
Those same people do not realize just how much cargo moves around by rail. On land rail is the most efficient way to move lots of mass and cubage around.
Every time I read an article about a derailment of an oil train and how the government sets rules to reduce train size and speed I think of Taggert Transcontinental railroad. AS has lodged in my brain
Of all the headlines which evoke a sense of AS, this one takes the cake hands down. The content, structure, and even the tone could be copied right from it.
Actually, they're saying its a lack of capacity due to the shale oil boom. Which somewhat surprises me as I wasn't aware they moved crude in grain hoppers...
What this emphasizes is how far the ability for rail to handle major movement has gone, thanks to the reliance on truck transportation. At one time we used to have a rail system second to none - evidenced in AS that the John Galt special (contrary to the movie) was not a passenger run, but a freight run (I *loved* that!); now out here you look at the abandoned lines, downsized and gutted switching yards, and the rolling stock is up in years (not to mention the ancient and abused prime movers)...
What we need is a modern-day Dagny to bring it back.
What... you're saying the government planners demanding an earlier harvest for the soybeans are *wrong*? Why, they know far better than we, the farmers, do on harvesting soybeans; the plan is to let them finish maturing on the railcars to the soy food factories so we can beat the predictions made for the current 5 year plan... It doesn't matter if they're still buds, because, by God, we'll order those beans to ripen to OUR schedule... or we'll *really* show them who's boss...
Is that the Twilight Zone music I hear in the background? You might sub-title Atlas Shrugged, Back to the Future. The book is five or six hundred pages, takes some hours to read, but real time moves more slowly. However, the ball is rolling downhill and gathering speed.
Don't forget that next year we will be the 30 years forward from the Back to the Future movies. I am still waiting for my hoverboard, but I can do without Biff's casino.
this is a very interesting point you have brought up. In Back to the Future I, note the huge differences between the 50s and the 80s. Compare 1985 to today. Yes, we have computers and the internet-but wouldn't you have thought there would have been huge leaps in other areas? house, car, plane design-dentistry for the average citizen?
Just looked at my hardbound copy. You're closer than me. I got 1169 pages. Haven't re-read it for about ten years. I think I'll look over my dog-eared, annotated, food-decorated copy as opposed to my pristine-only-opened-once copy.
Hello Herb7734, Hmm... my hardbound is at home in the library. It is probably the same as yours. My paperback from 1992 with tape all over it from being passed around and well read has 1074 pages... it sits on the shelf by my office desk at work. Regards, O.A.
I just read in the local grand junction paper that people in towns around grand junction at this moment have no source for coal since the local coal company has been closed since December 2013. thank you 0
I was going to say eastern Utah and western Colorado sits on a gigantic coal deposit. It's been a long time, but I once worked in a coal chemistry group.
there is probably enough coal between the 2 states to supply the whole country and half the world for the next 200 plus years. you would think the politicians in these states would actually do something positive, but that IS NOT ABOUT TO HAPPEN!
come to think of it, replace the John Galt line with the Keystone pipeline and we get even closer to the story. Except in this version the John Galt line does not apparently get built.
The article is really evocative of AS, though the article says the strain is because the yield is almost double last year (which is not exactly the fault of government). What I would be very interested to know is if there currently is a regulator price cap on rail rates. I would expect any caps to cause shortages during these peaks in demand. Does anybody know if a price cap is in effect?
the railroads are "common carriers" and, to the best of my recollection, there is no common carrier whose rates are not controlled -- like the utilities boards. -- j
Compete in the marketplace? Wait a minute... ;)
He successfully and effectively moves us inexorably closer to the goal of dependence of both the nation and us, its citizens. Yes, the prescient Ayn Rand indeed might have seen this in our future!
They dismiss it because Taggart Transcontinental is such a central focus of the story.
Those same people do not realize just how much cargo moves around by rail. On land rail is the most efficient way to move lots of mass and cubage around.
One of the ways AS remains so relevant today.
Actually, they're saying its a lack of capacity due to the shale oil boom. Which somewhat surprises me as I wasn't aware they moved crude in grain hoppers...
What this emphasizes is how far the ability for rail to handle major movement has gone, thanks to the reliance on truck transportation. At one time we used to have a rail system second to none - evidenced in AS that the John Galt special (contrary to the movie) was not a passenger run, but a freight run (I *loved* that!); now out here you look at the abandoned lines, downsized and gutted switching yards, and the rolling stock is up in years (not to mention the ancient and abused prime movers)...
What we need is a modern-day Dagny to bring it back.
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2014-07...
You are too much! I am not like Lou Grant and thankfully, nothing like Mr. Asner... I like spunk!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xY18MqdeF...
Regards,
O.A.
Hmm... my hardbound is at home in the library. It is probably the same as yours. My paperback from 1992 with tape all over it from being passed around and well read has 1074 pages... it sits on the shelf by my office desk at work.
Regards,
O.A.
Does anybody know if a price cap is in effect?
of my recollection, there is no common carrier whose
rates are not controlled -- like the utilities boards. -- j