Am I immoral?

Posted by CapitalistFred 12 years ago to Philosophy
51 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

First, a little bit about myself. I am in my 40s, have a wife and 3 kids, and am the founder and majority shareholder of a small chain of retail stores on the east coast. I am in a recession proof sector of retail, and have grown from 1 store 5 years ago to 12 today.

I am unwilling to even seriously consider going Galt, and will continue to grow my business, create wealth, employ the best people I can find, and yes, enrich the looters through the money that they confiscate from me at the point of a gun.

My reason for staying and continuing to fight is essentially a selfish one: I get great joy from continuing to succeed and grow in spite of all of the obstacles thrown in my way. I am proud of every dollar that I have earned, and it pleases me to be able to employ many who share my ideals and vision.

I am aware that the looters depend upon men like me to finance their oppression, but I am still unwilling to forego the pleasure that I get from continuing to prosper and grow amidst the carnage.

I am, as I have said before, more Rearden than Galt.

Does that make me immoral?

What say you?


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by LevelField 11 years, 11 months ago
    Not at all immoral. You are doing what you want to do. If things are as you say, you are not initiating the use of force, nor advocating it. Shrugging, only makes sense if we are close enough to the end of society for shrugging to cause the utter collapse. Collapse is only a goal if society is ready to, and capable of, learning the lesson it imposes so Capitalism can established.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by khalling 11 years, 11 months ago
      Helping evil succeed, does not make sense. Throughout history, govts have changed their policies when they notice that they are losing their most talented citizens.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by 11 years, 11 months ago
        Rand worked productively her entire life, and I think that the evidence shows that "galting" was simply a useful device to move the plot forward and make her philosophical point, and NOT an actual suggestion.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by khalling 11 years, 11 months ago
          I think the fact that Rand left Russia, and the hardships she encountered, show it was not just a plot device. Is it possible you might be helping people destroy what you love about the US?
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by 11 years, 11 months ago
            Relocating is NOT the same as galting. By your logic, comedian Yahkov Smirnoff was also galting when he emigratedto start his career as a comedian. She made $ Millions through productive work once she got the the USA, so clearly she never went on strke herself, nor, as far as I have ever been able to discover, did she ever encourage anyone else to actually galt (nor to blow up buildings.)
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Posted by khalling 11 years, 11 months ago
              What it means is withdrawing your productive resources from society, because they are using your resources to destroy what you believe is good.
              Rand took away her productive resources from the country she grew up in. She risked alot to do that. she wasn't just traveling the world. She wasn't just moving for a better job. She didn't just use her productive energy to make millions, she spent her time in the US trying to stop the decay and evil in the US. There are as many ways to do the above as a smart person can invent.
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by terrycan 12 years ago
    Since you make your money ethically you are a moral man. When is it time to go Galt? That is a question only you can answer. I'm not ready today. I am working on it.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Non_mooching_artist 12 years ago
    Wallowing. And happy to be in a position to enjoy the fruits earned. Waiting to hear the results of earnings as I write this. Husband is a vp and general counsel of a company that, let's just say, is booming as a result of the disaster of Obama's re-election. We also are in our 40's, 2 kids, east coasters.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by khalling 12 years ago
      I am glad that someone is in your position trying to help people deal with this disaster, but in a free world, people do not feel that they have to go stock up on guns. If people are spending more on guns and security, they are not producing other goods and services. Security is about protecting wealth already made. "company booming as a result of the disaster of Obama's re-election" and you're "...happy to be in a position to enjoy fruits earned." I just read what you wrote and asked for clarification.
      Overall, this is not a good sign for the nation, even though you are prospering and providing useful service. Finally, gun laws and gun purchases are more likely to increase under Obama (other dem president) than a republican president. If our economy was freer and people were not feeling threatened to protect themselves and their assets, do you believe you would still be "wallowing" in the same industry?
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by Non_mooching_artist 12 years ago
        Not all guns are used for security. The ones my neighbors own are used exclusively for hunting. What they shoot goes directly onto their tables. It's not just a security issue. Many enthusiasts just use them for target practice. I actually own no guns. I like to shoot, however.
        The rush on the industry was brought about by the potential infringement on gun ownership, whatever a person uses them for. The business employs many skilled people who are benefitting from this increase in demand. There is also the added bonus of it being a non-union operation.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by khalling 12 years ago
          Good points. I want to get back to the original question. It was not about enjoying success, which in here is a given and you do not have to explain yourself to me or anyone. This is a philosophical conversation and a provocative one at that. The premise was enjoying success and choosing not to galt in part due to enjoying success. The question of galting: is staying behind doing more damage? Look at Dagney and Hank. That was the whole idea behind the book. am presuming this the point of CapFed's post. If we don't ask questions, if we don't discern Objectivism's merits and, why it speaks to us, why we enjoyed and engaged in the reading of Atlas Shrugged and the movies, why else be in here? For myself, I have chosen to work through the process of galting. In fairness, the decision was a long time in the making and hard to act on. I submit we're mostly on the same page about this. Unsuccessful or unproductive individuals "galting" won't make the difference. It is the productive, the successful who will make the difference. I'm in here to discuss when and how and why. As individuals we will naturally make decisions regarding galting independently.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by 12 years ago
          Your husband did not create the political environment that lead to all of this fear, he (and you) have no need to "explain yourself".

          He is making an honest, and evidently prosperous, living by selling a constitutionally protected product to willing consumers.

          I celebrate your success there.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by Profit-Posse-dotcom 12 years ago
      What could be booming besides government and it's "chosen" ones?
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by 12 years ago
        There os ALWAYS room at the top, and many individual businesses are doing quite well, even in industries that are hurting.

        I am in retail, andthat is a sector that has done poorly, but there are well run copanies that are opening stores and growing profits, and my company is among them.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by Profit-Posse-dotcom 12 years ago
          Find a need > Create Value > participate in Capitalism and Free enterprise > restore America...
          I thought Government or it's "chosen" few were the only ones booming. But, it seems you've stuck to the basics (including a lot of hard work I imagine). Congrats!
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by DragonLady 12 years ago
        You've got the "chosen ones" right, but the judicial branch (for the most part), is NOT booming. Federal judges make far less than lawyers in private practice, as I would in the private sector working for a law firm, and there were massive layoffs last summer. The lucky ones (those with vested retirement) were able to take early retirement. We lost some productive people. I had always planned to retire at 62, and here I am still working at 65, and will be until 72.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by khalling 12 years ago
          Although I don't want Obama appointing them, we need more Federal judges. The process is danged slow. I have a great friend who works for a Federal judge but her husband is a doc. It would be interesting to read your take on some Supreme Court cases which leave me freaking out. In my world, it's IP decisions but also the thinking behind the Obamacare ruling.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by Profit-Posse-dotcom 12 years ago
          Thank you for your service! If your in here we probably are lucky to have you there. I didn't know that about Federal judges or the layoffs. I had the impression there was a shortage of Federal judges.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by DragonLady 12 years ago
            The layoffs were support and administrative staff, but there are vacancies in several district courts. What lawyer in his right mind would leave a highly lucrative practice to take a job that in most cases pays considerably less than half that amount? Plus district court and appellate judges are presidential appointments and must be confirmed by Congress. Yet another reason to be seriously concerned about another four years of this president.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by khalling 12 years ago
    There is not enough information here to answer. I guess, the point is, everyone has to decide for themselves when or whether to galt. However, if you are making money off the disaster that is Obama or the disaster happening to the US and LOVING IT, it is hard to see that you are truly someone who appreciates the work of Ayn Rand.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 12 years ago
      I make my money by ensuring that the customers in my retail stores get outstanding customer service and an excellent value. I am neither one of Obama's "chosen ones" nor a profiteer of the disastrous socialist policies of the current administration.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by Profit-Posse-dotcom 12 years ago
        Find a need > Create Value > participate in Capitalism and Free enterprise > restore America...
        I thought Government or it's "chosen" few were the only ones booming. But, it seems you've stuck to the basics (including a lot of hard work I imagine). Congrats!
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by Non_mooching_artist 12 years ago
      I would never love the destruction of this country. It's rather presumptive to assume that's what was meant. I am saying that the industry in which my husband works is booming, and it would continue to do so under a different president, as well. It's just that panic over potential tightening of gun laws has kicked it into overdrive.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by png 12 years ago
    Just remember that "shrugging" was created as a plot device. It made for a great novel, but it was not meant as practical advice. Rand didn't do it herself, and as far as I know she never told others to do it. What she said was that we should never do work that destroys what we value. If you were employed as an office manager for the Democratic National Committee, I would certainly advise you to quit that job. But what you're doing creates value, and I'm sure that Rand would have approved.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 12 years ago
      That's always been my opinion as well. I never have seriously considered going on strike, nor do I think that it makes any sense for me to do so.

      Since there is no actual gulch where I can go to create wealth without the looters coming after me, my best course, as far as I can tell, is to continue to find ways to outwit and outwork the looters and moochers, and to live well while doing so.

      And besides, I enjoy the hell out of it!
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by khalling 12 years ago
      You are wrong. Rand "galted" by leaving the USSR. People have been galting for centuries. they have left Cuba, China, Ireland, Viet Nam, Korea, India...and those who stuck around when Stalin, Mao, or Hitler were in charge at some point became at least complicit in perpetuating the evil. When people leave it has consequences for those countries.
      For example, productive industries such as chemical factories producing fixed nitrogen fertilizer. They were productive. They kept playing the game. But at some point they handed over the "gun" to the people who were going to kill them.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_...
      The whole damned point of Atlas Shrugged is that Hank and Dagney were just facilitating their destroyers.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by Profit-Posse-dotcom 12 years ago
      Charles Givens said "if you don't like the rules, build your own ballpark." I think they call it entrepreneurship. I'm doing just that. I didn't like the unethical and dishonest atmosphere typical in my industry. When my company closed and laid evreyone off (thousands), I may have been the only one not to take another similar job or go on unemployment. Instead, I started a small business. Not easy, but much more satisfying! I decide who I work with...including clients!
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
  • Posted by wgingram1 12 years ago
    As long as you are ahead of the game you would be a damn fool to go "Galt".
    If on the other hand the system creeps up behind you and nibbles here and there until you are spending more time just trying to put food on your table, pay your house payments, buy gasoline to get to work (ETC) then you go "GALT"
    I went "GALT" because I had reached the age that companies no longer wanted to hire me because I was just to old and they wanted younger (more creative?) minds to take my place. What they found out that the majority of the graduating students were FAR from being anything but creative, so they went out of business or soon will (or will be bought out by some other fool company that thinks they have the proper solution.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Comment deleted.
    • Posted by 12 years ago
      It is interesting to me that you believe that I "have to ask others what is the right thing to do".... you read a lot into my asking a simple question.

      I asked the readers here whether they think I am immoral.

      For myself, as I have said, I will not even consider shrugging, because I derive selfish pleasure from my money making activities.

      Since my own joy and prosperity is the aim of my life, my enjoyment of creating wealth makes it right for me. I have far too much self respect to ask others to set my priorities.

      I see that others here espouse going in strike, and I am curious how the strikers feel about my stand, as well as how many strikers vs non-strikers are here in the gulch.

      I dont believe that going Galt would bring me joy, nor do I truly believe that Rand herself meant for producers to literally strike.

      If a real life Galt creates an actual Gulch and invites me to join with the other creators, I will consider it, but unless and until that happens, I, and mine, will stand and fight.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by fivedollargold 12 years ago
    There is nothing immoral about honest work. I'm sure you feed the beast not one penny more than necessary to survive. Until Midas finds his valley, we will have to bide our time. You put your time and capital at risk to become a maker, a concept unpopular with the current regime.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 12 years ago
      Au contraire. I feed the beast many tmes more than would be needed merely to survive. The so called "progressive" tax system, and the highest corporate tax rates on earth ensure that I pay quite a bit to feed the east.

      I create as much wealth as I am able, which leads to higher tax revenues for the looters in "Mordor on the Potomac".

      I feel no guilt or shame over it, but my selfish economic activities DO benefit the moochers.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo