- Hot
- New
- Categories...
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
- Marketplace
- Members
- Store
- More...
Given the reductions caused by Obamacare, an alternative needs to be available.
My state has a single health care insurance provider. They have refused to cover in half the hospitals in the state, to "improve the networks". Basically those hospitals would not agree to the new schedule of reimbursements.
This automatically reduces available health care options for people with insurance. It will also cause those facilities to go under if they can't make another business model work.
Walmart as an option for minor things with a set fee schedule would be very usefull.
New Hampshire is the state if anyone was wondering.
This is known as "not letting a(n artificially created) crisis go to waste".
There is nothing of "quality" for sale at Wal-mart. Wal-mart's claim to fame is "cheap... and cheap... and cheap".
So if Wal-mart gets into healthcare, look into it being cheap, not quality.
Pfft... what am I saying? This is post-Jimmy-Carter America... we don't care about quality... just cheap.
If you think they have the capabilities for whatever ailment you have, by all means use them. If not go to the hospital.
Renewal/filling of prescriptions, blood pressure checks and simple things like that. The Doc in a Box model is perfectly fine.
If you need a hospital, go to the hospital.
But if you don't need that level of care, save yourself the money and use other options.
At least not yet
No matter what the quality of a Walmart Doc-in-a-box, it will still be less likely to kill you than health care controlled entirely by the government.
Nor should the government be controlling it at all.