Jane Addams and Ellsworth Toohey

Posted by khalling 7 years, 7 months ago to Philosophy
14 comments | Share | Flag

"I’m reminded of a scene in The Fountainhead, when an idealistic young social worker named Catherine Halsey is talking to her uncle, the intellectual Ellsworth Toohey. Catherine is feeling empty, having given much of herself to help those in need, and she is distressed at how unappreciative and ungrateful the recipients often are. “When I started,” she said, she knew that “one can find true happiness only in dedicating oneself to others.”[2] But over time she came to feel discouraged, tired — and to resent those she helped: “I expect people to be grateful to me,” and so on." Read on for Toohey's reply-
SOURCE URL: http://www.stephenhicks.org/2017/04/29/jane-addams-and-ellsworth-toohey/


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by $ Maree 7 years, 7 months ago
    Hi Khalling, haven't read much from you in recent months. Thankyou for another thought-provoking post.
    11years last week since i went on strike.
    Just home from competing in world masters games - 6 races in six days. I'm good at my sport and I say it.
    How's that kira?
    Mine now in 4th yr of her science degree.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by chad 7 years, 7 months ago
    Jane Addams, Ellsworth Toohey are far and away the majority of people. I think the only way to live freely is to live unobserved by the masses whether escape to a local where you are not recognized for who you are or blend in. The alternative is to expose yourself to ridicule, be in the aim of the marauders because they are afraid of you. It would almost seem the only escape from being murdered by the 'people' would be to commit suicide.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 7 years, 7 months ago
    I only vaguely understood why she seemed like such a shell of a person in the end of the book. Peter Keating was a jerk stringing her along, but when she meets him later I expect her to be mad at him or at herself for putting up with him or maybe genuinely happy she didn't marry the wrong person. Instead she's like a person on a heavy dose of Welbutrin, no highs or lows. It almost left me frustrated asking, "wait, has she forgiven him, or maybe she wasn't that into him either. What's going on?"
    I think Rand is trying to say Toohey sucks the life out of people.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 7 years, 7 months ago
      I see her not quite as Cheryl but similar. what do you think?
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by CircuitGuy 7 years, 7 months ago
        "Maybe Catherine had adopted Toohey’s philosophical view"
        It occurs to me Catherine became more like those religious people Cheryl tragically met. Catherine was a sympathetic character because Peter kept stringing her along, but in the end she was like those nuns. They didn't want to talk to some strong-minded productive person who was distraught because her husband was not who she thought he was. They wanted to help some pitiable person who they could fancy themselves superior to. I could imagine them saying these things: they resented people; they wanted more gratitude. Miseries were the coin of their realm, Rand would say.
        Maybe it's saying Toohey + Peter killed Catherine's spirit just as Jim + those nuns killed Cheryl.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by CircuitGuy 7 years, 7 months ago
        “I see her not quite as Cheryl but similar. what do you think?”
        They had a similarly bad b/f / husband, but their reactions were almost opposite. Cheryl was crushed while Catherine seemed content (or maybe numb, hard to say). Maybe Catherine had adopted Toohey’s philosophical view, while Cheryl refused to become like Jim.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by 7 years, 7 months ago
          I apologize, I should have qualified that I met their use in the story as a literary vehicle. I note that their outlook on life became opposite as you said. as a literary device, both had a view of the world fed by outside influence, and when that world view turned out to be incorrect/an illusion, both "died" in order to not have to face what their lives added up to. IN the case of Cheryl, I think she had options. In the case of Catherine, I think her complacency and her complicit actions left her exactly as Toohey instructed her life should become. I have often gently pointed out to friends who do a lot of volunteering or charitable work that 1. they can never use an excuse of "it doesn't matter, because none of this is for me" because for the most part that is untrue. They get value from it-even if their philosophy is pay it forward kind of thinking and 2. When their charitable work begins to degrade their personal lives, I remind them they "give back" selfishly 3. I hate the phrase "give back." It assumes you took something to begin with. You don't even get to start at the starting block to run your race.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by CircuitGuy 7 years, 7 months ago
            "it doesn't matter, because none of this is for me"
            What do they mean it doesn't matter? The closest thing I can think of is when I do a volunteer project hoping to meet new people and have fun but I don't enjoy it. I can see, "well at least I set up a bunch of cots for the homeless, so it wasn't a total waste." I don't think this is altruistic thinking on my part, but now I'm questioning that.

            "When charitable work begins to degrade their personal lives, I remind them they "give back" selfishly "
            Scott Adams has some right-to-the-point language on this that might reach some people who don't get philosophy.
            https://www.galtsgulchonline.com/post...

            "I hate the phrase "give back." It assumes you took something to begin with."
            It's a tendency of people who really were given a lot. People who clawed their way to success (I'm thinking of my wife) tend to be dismissive of the noting of "giving back". My wife and I have lots of funny stories centered around me learning as a young child it's generally good to help the poor, while she was living with the poor in places I never went.

            I completely understand the philosophical issue with the intransitive "give back", implying you owe a debt you never signed up for, like an original sin. If someone believes in that they should come out and say it instead of using a phrase premised on it.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by CircuitGuy 7 years, 7 months ago
            I'm glad you asked because I hadn't thought it through before. I just thought, "why isn't Catherine pissed, glad she didn't marry him, trying to get him back, or something, anything." I knew it was saying Toohey sucked the life out of her, but now I see it from the point of view that it was someone like her who Cheryl encountered when she needed to meet someone selfish (in the Ayn Rand sense).
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo