- Hot
- New
- Categories...
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
- Marketplace
- Members
- Store
- More...
My car proudly wears a bumper sticker: Who is John Galt? One time, a woman noticed it and asked whose car had the bumper sticker. When I spoke up, she basically blasted me for it. I asked, "Have you read it? It's my favorite book." She admitted she had never read it, but she had heard enough about it to suggest she wouldn't like it. I suggested she read it first before condemning it, and yes, she is a liberal and claims to be tolerant.
On the other hand, she loved The Goldfinch and I have to say having read that one, I wasn't impressed.
I wonder if a liberal person reading Atlas Shrugged gets the same message that a conservative gets? And I wonder if the irony of it just goes way over their heads? I really doubt most liberals could even draw a similarity of AS to todays politics. And now I'm wondering about the posters again, who or what is behind them again? Is it strictly B&N?
The first denies free will outright, the second denies such axiomatic agency indirectly---as merely derivative of the will of something "greater" (e.g, God, Society...or our DNA).
I don't get out much so I couldn't say if this is strictly a B&N thing and have no idea who is behind them. I was just happy to see it displayed in a place of prominence.
Oddly, I liked the movie Contact better than the book in many ways. That exception though highlights the rule.
I noticed the other 2 posters in the photo were both novels from similar era. Sadly, it lead me to thinking some interior designer just picked posters from a catalog and never actually read the book. (I hope I'm wrong!)
That is fantastic. I have an account and spend quite a bit at B&N. It is good to have fair exchange with businesses that are not afraid to be capitalists and support capitalism.
Respectfully,
O.A.
BTW: did you know that Barnes and Noble now have a college bookstore division, and have taken over a lot of college bookstores? Including the Yale University Bookstore. Which I discovered when I visited there a month ago.
I found it significant that the author does not explain Rand or Atlas. Like Harry Potter or other common "memes" Rand and Atlas are widely recognized.
My tallies here are almost four years old
http://necessaryfacts.blogspot.com/20...
but in round numbers, about 40 million copies of her works have been purchased. Of those, about 7 to 8 million each count for The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged. And that's just the books. You have to count The Simpsons. It is hardly an intellectual examination of the ideas, but millions of people watched the first runs and now the syndicated re-runs.
My perspective here is that it is common in the Gulch for us to want to be lonely and persecuted, but the facts speak otherwise. Not everyone who enjoyed The Renaissance built their personal values on Aristotle's metaphysics. It was not necessary that they all did. Similarly, by one tally, the author most often cited by the Signer of the Declaration and Constitution was Saint Paul. The American republic, however, was not built on the idea that we should all obey the authorities because God put them here to rule over us.
Just sayin'... The broad trends of a civilization's culture are expressions of its deeper roots. We have had a lot of blossoming and blooming since 1957.