At Last Greenpeace Faces Racketeering-RICO Charges
Author Walter Donway: "This is an accurate characterization of Greenpeace. Its co-founder, Dr. Patrick Moore, built the fledgling organization for 15 years, but then went into opposition, declaring “Greenpeace and much of the environmental movement were declaring humans the enemies of the earth … I had to leave.”
Now, he is against Greenpeace and all its works, including its blocking use of GMO Golden Rice, which could save millions of children in Africa and Asia from going blind, then dying, of Vitamin A deficiency. Some 107 Nobelists in science agree with Dr. Moore, signing a letter addressed to Greenpeace that pleads with the organization to stop blocking Golden Rice."
Now, he is against Greenpeace and all its works, including its blocking use of GMO Golden Rice, which could save millions of children in Africa and Asia from going blind, then dying, of Vitamin A deficiency. Some 107 Nobelists in science agree with Dr. Moore, signing a letter addressed to Greenpeace that pleads with the organization to stop blocking Golden Rice."
That group of Nobel prize winners have appealed to Greenpeace to stop causing needless death. But the aim of Greenpeace is death - to reduce human numbers to stone age levels.
Do not appeal to it, fight it.
Meanwhile, there are serial contributors on this forum who perpetrate the same and similar superstitions such as the harm of carbon dioxide.
Couldn't happen to a more deserving bunch of extremists.
I see few people complaining of increasing CO2 levels planting trees... if one truly believes it is a problem they should do more than just increase the CO2 levels with every vitriolic breath... Of course that is the tell. What they really want is to reduce the population and/or return us to the pre-industrial age even though they will use modern technology to do so. The contradictions and hypocrisy are monumental.
Regards,
O.A.
An environmental group threatened us with a lawsuit. So my boss invited them in and showed them our plans. All the environmental folks were impressed and left saying that it was a great project. Two weeks later we got a letter from their lawyers saying they were going to sue anyway. It's really not about the environment, it's about extortion.
I would get drunk for a week, if this lawsuit is successful!
a
I would like to see a requirement that lawsuits of that type convince both a jury of the public and a jury of (civilian) scientists before the plaintiff can win.