Clinton is most definitively not Uber-everything. She’s like the union of taxicab medallion owners fighting to preserve incumbents. She’s on record as wanting to crack down on services like Uber that make extensive use of independent contractors.

I am the pro-market, pro-information, and pro-innovation option. Hillary Clinton, on the other hand and according to your own observations, is someone else:
– “As secretary of state, her inclination toward military solutions had disastrous consequences in the Middle East.”
– “The US still has an alarming tendency to try to solve complex foreign policy problems with flying killer robots.”
– “She seems to favor encryption weak enough for law enforcement to penetrate. That violates basic privacy.”

And here’s what I’m not, as opposed to your choice:
– I’ve never engaged in influence peddling or pay-to-play.
– I don’t want to restrict political speech and undermine the First Amendment in the process.
– I’m not wedded to the education establishment that wants to stifle innovation and school choice.
– I don’t want to restrict your gun rights.
– I don’t believe choosing to use marijuana should be a crime.
– And I actually believe in free trade, as opposed to anyone else who will be on the ballot for President in all 50 states.