Living with de-facto Directive 10-289
The recent move by the USPTO shows that the federal registration of any intellectual property is an at-whim agreement and can be reversed at any time.
I copyright my work with the US Copyright office.
I was not thrilled with their recent fee hike from $35 to $55 per online registration (think about that), but this recent move by the USPTO has really soured me on the Copyright office.
Is there any legal way to copyright protect my work other than the federal government's at-whim registration?
Thanks.
I copyright my work with the US Copyright office.
I was not thrilled with their recent fee hike from $35 to $55 per online registration (think about that), but this recent move by the USPTO has really soured me on the Copyright office.
Is there any legal way to copyright protect my work other than the federal government's at-whim registration?
Thanks.
I heard yesterday that the USPTO did the same thing to the Redskins in the 90's, got sued and had to give them back the trademarks. Of course the courts are so rigged now it won't make any difference.
This sounds like a great question for dbhalling.
This is just another example like the IRS scandal where government employees are using their positions politically to favor an outcome for their political donors.
Not sure.