Is it moral to tax lifestyle?
This one has been a hot-button topic for many, but the primary question it poses should alarm many. The assumption is that the government should be responsible for influencing health choices of consumers.
Agree? Disagree? Somewhere in the middle?
Agree? Disagree? Somewhere in the middle?
Education, and trust in the gov't agencies is what's needed, not a sin tax.
Trying to maintain those tight sugar levels is one of the things that scared me most. Fortunately, as a T2, I had a chance at changing that.
and, I had a Dr that was also an ND. Once he saw I was committed to changing what needed to be changed, he was very helpful. Most MD's aren't so helpful. They figure most people won't put forth the effort to change their lifestyles so they simply teach them how to manage their ailments.
As much as I believe all the sugar and HFCS, et.al is the cause of a lot of our health problems, I don't believe taxing is the way to achieve behavior modi faction.
What could also be brought up is the contrast to many Type II Diabetics - who allow their abuse of diet to control their lives. My wife's uncle recently died because he refused to treat his Type II Diabetes with even a modicum of diet and exercise. He knew the costs of his actions and eventually got exactly what he wanted.
Given how many people on this post are themselves or are related to diabetics, I have started doing some work to print tissue scaffolding. This isn't optimized yet, but the next stage is culturing with Islet cells to deal with insulin issues. That is a couple of years off right now.
Here are a couple of symptoms regarding the onset of Type I Diabetes to look for. Keep in mind that the reason they call Type I "Juvenile" Diabetes is because the onset typically happens before one is twenty years old.
1) Is the person always drinking water and constantly urinating? (My two-year old would drink 16 oz of water at a time and ask for more.)
2) Does their urine smell "fruity" and have a fluorescent yellow color (almost like antifreeze)? This is a strong indication of high concentrations of sugar in the urine.
3) If feminine, do they suffer from persistent yeast infections (due to the extra sugar in the urine)?
4) Are they losing weight (especially muscle mass) despite eating well?
5) Does their breath smell like fruit-flavored gum? (This is another sign of too much sugar in the bloodstream)
6) Are they irritable all the time and irrational much of the time (result of brain not getting enough sugar).
For a more medical diagnosis, you can pick up a blood glucose meter from any store and do a standard finger-prick test. These are highly accurate and very cheap. Or just find a Diabetic who has one and ask to get tested. If your result is over 300, you should seek immediate medical attention and confirmation of the diagnosis.
You can also take an A1C test (of your urine). While the A1C is more of a long-term test, it also is highly indicative of blood chemistry problems associated with diabetes.
Keep in mind that only a doctor can make a positive diagnosis (even though all they do is another finger-prick test).
If your daughter is gaining weight, that is usually an indicator against diabetes. Because diabetes is actually the body's inhibited state from being able to metabolize sugars and carbohydrates (the basis for most foods), it would be highly unusual to exhibit weight gain. That being said, the finger-prick will be far more authoritative.
Wait until at least an hour after eating, but the normal blood sugar range should be 120-180 or so. Anything over 200 and doctors usually call that "pre-diabetes" and want you to eat better and exercise more. Anything above 300 (especially if the meter says "high" and you are almost certainly diabetic.
As always, get a professional consultation from a licensed physician - mostly just so that insurance will accept your claims!
Rewarding the government with higher revenues is not a solution for ANYTHING.
I'll make them a deal: when you get the big problems solved, let's have a discussion about whether you're even chartered to address these small potatoes. Until then, I'm not impressed with your inability to get your REAL JOB done. Get to work!
The sooner such people are out of my life, the better. Anything that starts out as for my own good or the good of society or civilization or the children or, etc. just serves to make my blood boil and shorten my life.
So...artificially sweetened soft drinks would be cheaper. Oh...that's good. (sarcasm)
Of course, both were formerly part of Monsanto, perhaps the looter mentality comes naturally.
Should the gay life style be taxed? It does add a healthcare burden to society.
Sugar today, Eggs tomorrow, Margarine the next week (but we can takes eggs off).
Beef ok, Pork not. Salmon good, Tuna not so much.