Are Changes Coming For Rifle And Shotgun Purchases?
Ok...what would the "objectivist" say...
I say that any individual that has consistently exhibited poor or criminal behavior, is on psychotropic drugs (under the care of a physiologist) or comes from or associates with pagan barbaric religious groups-(muslims) should not have guns.
But...to give the AMA any of this power or rely upon their say so...NO! after all, these are the creatures that have brought you the "Sickness Symptom Careless System".
I say that any individual that has consistently exhibited poor or criminal behavior, is on psychotropic drugs (under the care of a physiologist) or comes from or associates with pagan barbaric religious groups-(muslims) should not have guns.
But...to give the AMA any of this power or rely upon their say so...NO! after all, these are the creatures that have brought you the "Sickness Symptom Careless System".
And the First, come to think of it.
We'd all be better off if the AMA was dissolved.
Actually, I changed doctors because my previous one insisted I live within Obamacare's guidelines, tests, therapies, etc. When he asked if I owned any firearms, that was the end of our relationship.
Don't think I need to worry about my regular doctor, who I see every four months.
He once referred to the Obama regime as "people who do not know what they are doing."
One could argue that the lying control freaks know exactly what they are doing but I let it go.
I go there to keep my Type 2 Diabetes under control.
Some eBay dealer in Sherman tanks must reside in your home town.
A trainer told me not to call it a bazooka but it looked like a bazooka to me.
I also fired a LAWS but I can't remember what the target was.
It wasn't a tank because I recall there being only one tank I ever put a whammy on.
A cart was the target. All I had to do was aim with the tracers to keep the recoiling bursts on target.
This was at Camp Lejeune,
It was a heck of a lot more fun than Parris Island for this draftee.
Of course they want to enter this fray with the position that "we can help you as the concerned, intelligent professionals...Just give us control."
The same applies to "assault weapon". They are disingenuously confusing the difference between object and the motive. To illustrate the absurd here, someone should report on a case where an intruder was shot by an AR-15 Home Defense rifle who was wielding an assault baseball bat.
A direct line from God? Here are just a few.
I can possess slaves as long as they come from neighboring nations.
(I prefer the Canadian type)
I can sell my daughter into slavery.
I'm not allowed in the presence of menstruating women.
(I already told you about the bull burning)
Touching the skin of a dead pig is an abomination, which screws up my football playing.
Must I go on?
That is not to say that there should not be any rules...we do need to drive together in opposing directions on opposite sides of the road if you want to live and get where your going. Even nature and the physical laws are constructed that way. Just a couple rules to make sure it all runs smoothly and that doesn't mean we need a rule for everything either, unless no one has common sense...do what ever you will and chaos is the result...it 's your choice. Live or Die...to be or not to be.
Laughing...With out a mind or at least a blooming connection to one does not qualify a message from beyond whether that be the ether or a pagan god...clearly the laws you state came from a demented pagan, barbaric brain...let them eat bacon...they may get sick but I doubt they'll burn in hell because of it...that silly stuff cracks me up.
Plus, I don't see why I can't have my own Canadian.
Also, most men I know get their hair trimmed around their temples where it is expressly forbidden. Can you suggest the best way to kill them?
If you can demonstrate that Canadians are not consciously aware and never will be...then you may have one as your pet. I'm laughing but I bet they won't be...
You might have to roast over a bon fire...beware of the carbon police though...
I'm sure God will smite them.
What about due process? In the first case, if they have been convicted of a felony, then yes, they should lose their 2nd Amendment rights along with some others (like the franchise.) But where is the due process involved in being under the care of (what I presume you meant to say) a psychologist or psychiatrist, or being a member of some arbitrarily-defined religious group?
Depriving people of Constitutionally defined rights with no due process will not ever end well. What if a proggie Administration decides that NRA membership constitutes membership in a "dangerous extremist group?" Go to the comments section of any article on gun control and you'll see progtards making exactly that argument.
But think of it this way...No sane, healthy or conscious individual ever perpetrated crimes and violence that we see today and yes, everyone has their trigger points...but the one's most vulnerable to committing these act are clearly flawed in some profound way and the circumstances I put forth are the ones, I think, we should consider.
We can do "What If's" all day long but it ain't gona have any effect upon the problem. I don't think there is a perfect answer here.
You are proposing depriving a group of people of a fundamental, Constitutionally recognized liberty. What due process is involved?
As for islam...especially the newly immigrated, in my mind have not earned these rights yet, must be citizens...no? and I am aware that it's automatic these days...that too is against the constitution is it not?
What local court will decide this? And do you really think it would take a higher court more than about ten seconds to overturn such a decision? And can the "local community" somehow override the Constitution in deciding who is and isn't worthy of their rights defined by the Second Amendment?
I really don't think you've thought this through.
I understand we are trying to stand on principle here but it seems by doing so we will be shot and taken over anyway. I don't see anyway the twain will meet.
What
About
Due
Process?
You describe above the tactics the political Left are using to try to reduce or eliminate fundamental liberties. Are you suggesting we go along with them in the name of expediency? Are you suggesting we fall into the trap of having to "do something" in response to the shouting of hysterics?
In reviewing the thread, you really aren't addressing anything I write; you're just going off on a new tangent with each reply. I'll give you the last word.
Everything I've written defines the problem and expressed the difficulties of coming to a solution. Due process is not a solution, it's an ideal...and a good one, I agree, but it won't solve the problem of being confronted with creatures that have no principles.
So what's your solution, what will you do when you come face to face with it, because it's real and most likely it will at one time or another knock upon our door. I don't have the perfect answer and I can see that Objectivism does not either. No amount of logic or reason will help... We have no Gulch to run to.
It's that simple.
After a little research, it looks like you can with an NFA license. Some have sold as cheaply as $40K, but not your Sherman. Wanna go in halvsies with an LLC?
the first "who" is fascist or professional -- or both. -- j
.
Be very careful about taking away inalienable rights.
Just posted a piece on moral equivalence...it's highly relative to this discussion.
No matter the guidelines in time such as these something always presents a problem whether it be principle or protection and how one arrives at the answer...I've come to the concussion...there is no answer that solves the problem in the paradigm.
Woopie...we all might die... unjustly
As to terrorists, they will have the guns (probably already have them) to do their killing regardless of what our pathetic government does.
That's what's happened in California. Those who own magazines with capacity exceeding 10 rounds must be turned in to authorities. Exactly how they'll enforce this, I don't know. Prohibiting alcohol and drugs didn't work. Prohibiting small inanimate objects, like magazines looks tough. Maybe they'll try to subpoena purchase records from retailers and send brownshirts door to door.
If enough productive people leave the state and enough illegals who don't pay taxes move in and the Federal government quits propping them up we might get to see what an illegal state bankruptcy looks like.
I would have to paint over the left side of the screen.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/02/us/...