- Hot
- New
- Categories...
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
- Marketplace
- Members
- Store
- More...
The question of whether the person was truly of the sex they portrayed is not
relevant, an assault took place, it was unprovoked, bystanders became voyeurs and not defenders of the victim.
There may be a few old fuddy duddies here who (like me?) find a lot objectionable, orange hair, rude words in tattoos, not being sure if a person dressed as sex A is in fact sex B,
such is life.
As our younger generation say- 'Chill it'.
If you don't want to be judged negatively for your looks... then *choose* a look that reflects positive qualities. Choose not to pierce your body. Choose not to use it as a graffiti wall. Choose to groom yourself in a respectable way.
There's a difference between judging somebody because he wears clothes that don't fit, and judging somebody because he doesn't pull his darned oversized, overpriced pants back up over his ass. The former indicates poverty; the latter indicates a lack of good judgment and weak character.
The claim is that they were assaulted because they were trans... but again, how did the assailants know? Were they assaulted in a "normal" mugging, and then stripped once they were somehow found out?
Hey, I don't agree with "hate crime" laws, but if we're going to have them, they should at least be applied accurately.
Appalled - is an understatement. Felonious assault against someone for a strangers personal life? And the crowd cheering? How 4th grader bully schoolyard are these adults? Betcha they have every justification for assaulting and prejudging these 2 people who were probably minding their own business... Who, like you, woke up that morning thinking how great it is to be alive...
I was wondering... what if it was your daughter, instead of these 2 strangers? She had put her hair in spikes to be silly, just this one time. And those people thought she was some "deviant anarchist punk, probably some dyke, that deserved it"?
I pledge to take action to defend people being assaulted in this way. Who's with me?
Snooping the emails of law-abiding citizens? Taking a doughnut break? Going out on strike for more pay & higher retirement benefits? Where were they?
I have a person at work who is in the middle of his/her transgender transformation. OK, fine, I don't really care that much which bathroom he/she prefers at the moment. What does bother me is that in a professional organization this person comes to work in less than mini skirts and other dress attributes that would get an award on Times Square and in every way tries to provoke a response and then immediately complain to management. So, really, this is not an issue of sex change, but of behavior and constant challenges to everyone around. BTW, on the website where this story is published, notice the reference to Obama: "President of Our Hearts Barack Obama Proclaims LGBT Pride Month" - again, do they really expect everyone to embrace them?
When one purposefully acts provocatively, he shouldn't be surprised at the response. Unfortunately, the current legislation makes them a protected species and instead of being rebuffed for a specific behavior, others have to bear it, until it blows up as it did in Atlanta.
He's not a young girl, surgery and drug therapy notwithstanding.
There's no rational comparison of cause and effect.
Taking your agenda to its ultimate destination, "Him" and "her" will one day be replaced in the Newspeak dictionary by either "them" or "it". I'm betting on "them", since that fits the collectivist mindset so well... Shades of "Anthem"...
George Orwell's Newspeak concept was about LIMITING speech, not about changing speech.
But you do bring up a legitimate point about how other people might not always know which terms are considered offensive or not, which is why I personally think it's best not to worry about it too much, and instead judge people by their actions, attitude, and intentions, rather than by the words they happen to choose.
http://lexiecannes.com/2014/06/01/two-ar...
The liberals like to argue "free speech" means you can say anything you wish, when they are supporting one of their causes. That's not true. you can't yell "Fire" in a theater or public venue unless there is a fire. That issue has been to the supreme court. Pornography was deemed to be a local issue. If it is something considered offensive in that city, town, or village.... Was it offensive? To me, it is against nature, but I don't care enough to be troubled by it.
Ben Franklin is sometimes attributed with saying, "An armed society is a polite society." IMHO all could have used a bit more politeness in their behavior. And, once again, we are in a venue where there is little expectation of an armed society.
I know some may find it offensive but...if a man looks at Sofia Vergara and feels nothing, I feel concern for that man. And, I'm not being sarcastic. I just "don't understand it". But, I respect my gay friends, and appreciate that they respect me and my family.
I even know some women who will admit that they find Sofia attractive. It must be that the curves and softness has some sort of biological trigger. When I stop liking that you can put me in a pine box...
The actress who played Dagny Taggart in ASII?...Yep. No complaints here.
I also find her very attractive, physically. Considering that her next project was where she portrayed half of a lesbian pair... not so much mentally (or maybe I should say "philosophically").
And once again that bastard Holmes claims another rhetorical victim.
Yes... you *can*, per the Constitution. Only if there is property damage or someone is injured as a result should there be any repercussions for shouting "fire!" in a crowded theater that is not on fire.
I'm not a liberal, but you can say anything you wish... in the public arena. The 1st Amendment specifically prohibits the government from preventing you.
Assault is an evil response to that.
Diabetes has its origins in biology and genetics, too. That doesn't keep it from being a disease in need of proper treatment. Indulging a diabetic in the delusion that they're normal, and therefore can eat an entire German chocolate cake without consequences is the equivalent of mutilating and perverting a person's body rather than treating that disorder.
And you're being disingenuous... not *all* sexual deviancy is a result of biology and genetics; probably not even most, I suspect. But, you want to hide the majority behind the skirts of the minority.
We've gone over this again, and again, Humpty. The human reproductive organs exist to procreate the species. They do not exist for the purpose of pleasure; rather they provide addictive pleasure (on the order of heroin) in order to encourage animals to engage in the reproductive process.
The bonding of romantic feelings exists to ensure the survival of the offspring until they, in turn, are able to reproduce.
The imperfection of reproduction (that is, that every sexual encounter doesn't result in offspring) is an effect of evolution in action. If every time she were mounted, a female produced offspring, that would actually be detrimental to the species, particularly in the wild.
Any sexual attraction or romantic feeling that is not aligned with this evolutionary imperative is, to one degree or another, an illness.
This is obvious to people who recognize sex as reproduction, and seems impossible to recognize for people who can only think of sex as a means of pleasure.
I have to wonder how the question even came up?
This sounds terrible. Almost as bad as what happened to Twana Brawley...
CTYankee is inaccurate, however. Men dressed as women shouldn't be an issue since women commonly dress like men nowadays. These were men *pretending* to be women. Another thing entirely. (an example; Eddie Izzard commonly dresses as a woman, but he doesn't try to pretend to be a woman).
Still doesn't justify assault. But it does explain it.
A woman walking alone down a dark alley in a Florida town during spring break, in a bikini, doesn't justify her subsequent assault and rape... but it does explain it.